• Denny’s CEO Kelli Valade isn’t afraid to admit she’s always working to be better—and she values that same humility in job candidates. Recognizing your weaknesses and asking thoughtful questions, she says, can set you apart in an interview. It’s a mindset shared by Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang, who got his start as a Denny’s dishwasher and credits the journey teaching him hard work and humility.

Landing a job in today’s market can feel like finding a needle in a haystack. Not only do you have to find a role that you’re interested in—and are qualified for—but you also have to craft an application, resume, and cover letter that’s interesting to both humans and AI. But once you land the coveted interview, that’s when the pressure is on. 

Luckily, even during an era of AI-assisted interviews, there remain ways to stick out from the crowd.

When asked what her red flags are in hiring, Kelli Valade, CEO of Denny’s Corporation, noted that she asks applicants a few critical questions.

One of the signs Valade looks for comes at the end of the interview, when she asks: what questions do you have for me?

“Have a thoughtful one or two. You don’t really even have to have more than that,” she tells Fortune. “Any more than that, actually, it’s too much.”

In fact, it often does not matter what the questions are, but the fact that you do ask shows you did your homework and are seriously interested, Valade adds. 

(However, Shark Tank star Barbara Corcoran advises candidates to ask, “Is there anything standing in the way of you hiring me?”)

She also is sure to ask: what would they say makes you most effective at what you do? Typically, candidates are pretty well equipped to answer that question, Valade says.

“Then I ask them, what would make them more effective?” she explains. “Which basically is saying, what are your weaknesses? And there you’d be amazed at how many people can’t answer that, or would say, ‘I’ve not thought about it.’ And so really what you’re saying is, ‘I’ve not thought about my weaknesses.’”

The 55-year-old admits that she herself is a work in progress, but what’s helped her stand out throughout her career is not shying away from admitting her areas of improvement. It’s something she hopes to see in her employees, too.

From Denny’s dishwasher to leading the world’s biggest company

Now that you know tips for getting hired at Denny’s, you may ask, why work at the restaurant chain?

There may be no more notable member of Denny’s employee alumni than Jensen Huang. The now billionaire CEO of Nvidia started his career at the diner as a dishwasher at just 15 years old—and it’s experience he credits for teaching him about hard work.

“I planned my work. I was organized. I was mise en place,” Huang told students at Stanford’s Graduate School of Business last year. “I washed the living daylights out of those dishes.”

“No task is beneath me,” he added. “I used to be a dishwasher. I used to clean toilets. I cleaned a lot of toilets. I’ve cleaned more toilets than all of you combined. And some of them you just can’t unsee.”

And while his time at Denny’s came well before Valade’s tenure, she says they are now friends today—and the billionaire continues to pay homage to the diner. His LinkedIn notably only includes two employers: Denny’s and Nvidia. He also made an appearance last year at Denny’s franchise convention and partnered with the company to launch a special edition “Nvidia Breakfast Bytes.”

“Start your first job in the restaurant business,” Huang said in 2023. “It teaches you humility, it teaches you hard work, it teaches you hospitality.”

From hostess to CEO

Valade started her career in the restaurant space at just age 16, when she landed a hostess job at TJ’s Big Boy. Decades later, she began climbing up the corporate ladder in the human resources world—with the dream of one day becoming a chief people officer, not necessarily becoming a CEO. 

So when she was tapped to jump from head of HR to chief operations officer at Chili’s, self-doubt was her first instinct.

“I didn’t think I could do that at the time,” she recalls. “I thought, I think you’re looking for the wrong person here. I don’t know. My first instinct was, I’m not sure I know how to do that.”

While the feeling is natural, she adds leaders—and especially women—should self-reflect on whether you are holding yourself back from a greater potential.

“Push yourself and challenge yourself on why you may not feel like that,” she adds.

After later rising to brand president at Chili’s and CEO of Red Lobster, Valade was tapped to become Denny’s CEO in 2022, centering her career on two of her favorite things: people and pancakes.

This story was originally featured on Fortune.com

© Courtesy of Denny's Corporation

A seismic generational shift is underway, and its epicenter is Generation Z. Born from 1997 onward, Gen Z is coming of age in a world where traditional milestones like landing a lifelong job, buying a house in your 20s, or chasing wealth for its own sake have become difficult, or borderline impossible, in the modern economy. Gen Z has responded pragmatically, insisting, well, maybe they don’t really want those things anyway.

A massive new study from EY’s Generational Dynamics core team, spanning more than 10,000 young adults across 10 countries and five continents, finds Gen Z is often misunderstood—and their measured approach should define them as the “pragmatic generation.” The authors, Marcie Merriman and Zak Dychtwald, wrote Gen Z approaches “life’s traditional milestones” with a sort of “reasoned skepticism.”

According to Joe Depa, EY Global chief innovation officer, the research reveals how 18- to 34-year-olds are taking a surprisingly pragmatic approach to adulthood, finances, and their future. “Far from being financially reckless,” Depa tells Fortune Intelligence, “this generation is focused on long-term stability — and redefining success along the way.”

Money, for them, is necessary but not the be-all and end-all: 87% say financial independence is important, yet only 42% rate wealth as a primary marker of success, trailing far behind metrics like mental and physical health and family relationships. Put simply, for Gen Z, financial stability is a tool—not a goal. They use money to open doors to flexibility, purpose, and well-being.

Depa says the research “tells a different story” about Gen Z. “The idea that young adults are postponing adulhtood is outdated.” They’re approaching life milestones not with rebellion but with “reasoned skepticism and a global perspective.” As employees and customers, Gen Z will challenge organizations that have been wired around a different way of doing things. For business leaders, understanding this shift will be vital to attracting and retaining talent.

The job hoppers

Where baby boomers and Gen Xers often stuck with one employer for decades, Gen Z is dismantling that concept.

EY’s research found 59% of young adults globally expect to work for two to five organizations throughout their lives, and nearly 20% say they will work for six or more. This flexible approach to employment—embracing job changes and flexible gig work—reflects not only a desire for varied experiences, but a strategic response to rapid change, uncertainty, and a lifetime of economic instability.

“Younger generations are not merely reacting to financial constraints,” the EY Generational Dynamics team writes, but making rational and thoughtful decisions about what aligns with both their own lived experiences and the pitfalls suffered by previous generations. EY says it’s a perspective that contrasts sharply with the “pull yourself up by your bootstraps” mentality often espoused by older generations, with Gen Z finding that to be dismissive of their specific context.

Redefining success: inside out, not outside in

Success, in Gen Z’s eyes, is an inside-out project: emotional well-being, strong relationships, and impact outrank titles and salaries. It’s no longer about ticking the boxes of homeownership, lifelong employment, or even traditional family milestones. Landmarks such as marriage and children are being postponed—not out of rejection, but for pragmatic reasons: economic insecurity, housing unaffordability, and a desire to be emotionally and financially prepared.

The rise of job-hopping has replaced the well-worn “script” of adulthood: Only 59% see working for a single organization as a viable path, whereas nearly 20% of respondents said they plan to work for six or more employers in the course of their careers. Linear career ladders and employer loyalty are giving way to “project-based” growth, taking new jobs, and side hustles, all in search of variety, autonomy, and purpose. “Job hopping is not viewed as a negative, but an essential step to open doors and advance opportunities,” the EY team writes.

The average Gen Z respondent reports feeling like an adult earlier than previous generations, and as a result, more than half (51%) said they prioritize physical and mental health as their chief markers of success, with family ties also outranking wealth in many countries. The push for authenticity is also striking; 84% cite “being true to oneself” as extremely important.

Employers, beware (and evolve)

For Gen Z, a job is not a life sentence, nor is money alone enough to keep them engaged. Employers used to loyalty and linear career ladders may be blindsided by Gen Z’s willingness to prioritize purpose, wellness, and flexibility—even if it comes at the expense of job security or long-term benefits. Conventional incentives are losing their grip.

For employers, this new pragmatism is both a wake-up call and an opportunity. Flexibility is mandatory, with hybrid and remote work, fluid hours, and support for “micro-retirements” between jobs becoming non-negotiable.

Gen Z expects employers to have clear values around well-being, sustainability, and social justice—and to act on them. Over 70% want their employer to be transparent about values and pay, and are unafraid to challenge leadership if authenticity is found wanting. This generation will quickly leave if growth stalls: 57% would quit for better professional development. They crave mentorship, personalized learning, and a sense of upward mobility.

Gen Z is less loyal to brands or employers unless that loyalty is returned; nearly half say they have “zero loyalty” to brands, and only about 60% feel any loyalty to their employer. Empathetic leadership and honest, two-way communication are expected, not a bonus.

Gen Z wants to be included in company decisions and expects a seat at the table. This finding aligns with separate research from Glassdoor, whose Worklife Trends report in June 2025 found emotional intelligence is now a standard expectation held by workers, many of them Gen Z. “The bar on what constitutes a good manager has been raised,” Glassdoor chief economist Daniel Zhao previously told Fortune Intelligence.

Employers slow to adapt to these realities won’t just struggle to recruit Gen Z—they’ll risk losing relevance altogether. The pragmatic playbook demands companies redesign everything from hiring and communication to values and pay structures.

The flip side? Gen Z’s pragmatism can also be an asset: They are technologically adept, mission-driven, and resourceful. But their skepticism can also translate into disengagement or even open dissatisfaction if workplaces fail to address their real priorities. Businesses would be pragmatic in their own right to tune into what Gen Z values most—authentic leadership, transparent communication, and support for well-being—if they want to retain this generation.

For this story, Fortune used generative AI to help with an initial draft. An editor verified the accuracy of the information before publishing. 

This story was originally featured on Fortune.com

© FG Trade—Getty Images

• Multimillionaire Shark Tank investor Kevin O’Leary looks for three star qualities in the entrepreneurs he goes into business with: those who have a “founder’s mindset,” a balanced talking-to-listening ratio, and executional prowess. From working with the likes of late Apple cofounder Steve Jobs and multimillion-dollar entrepreneurs to being an investor on his hit-TV show, he’s picked up a few patterns of the most successful people. 

Multimillionaire entrepreneur Kevin O’Leary knows a thing or two about picking the right people and ideas to invest in. Having worked with greats like Steve Jobs, not to mention his success on Shark Tank backing businesses generating millions, he’s picked up on a few key qualities in great founders. 

O’Leary looks for three qualities in the people he chooses to do business with. The 71-year-old investor tells Fortune the most critical trait is having “founder’s mindset”: adopting a frame of mind that prioritizes “signal,” or what has to get done in the next 18 hours, while drowning out the “noise” of everyday life and complications. He witnessed this demeanor while working with Jobs, when Apple was partnering with O’Leary’s $4.2 billion software company SoftKey Software Products. He requires that the founders he invests in have that same leadership ethos—even if it’s a quality that’s hard to come by. 

“The ability to see all the noise coming at you and filter it out, and focus on the three to five things you’re going to get done, that’s a remarkable attribute,” O’Leary tells Fortune. “You find that in 30% of the people. Then you want to back those people, because if they’re not successful in their first mandate, they’re going to figure it out. That attribute is very important.”

When it comes to the signal versus the noise, he currently operates on a 80:20 balance, just like Jobs did while running Apple, and looks for entrepreneurs who can keep their eye on the ball.

O’Leary admits that he didn’t always have the right ratio in embodying the founder’s mindset—but now has achieved it, and looks for it in others.

“You have to decide everyday, every 18 hours, what three to five things you have to get done,” O’Leary says. “It’s not the big vision. It’s what you have to get done in the next 18 hours that matters.”

The two other traits a founder needs to have O’Leary’s backing

O’Leary has heard hundreds—if not thousands—of entrepreneurs plead their business case while starring on Shark Tank. Thanks to his intuition from decades in the game, he’s worked alongside and invested in a lot of winners.

In 2014, O’Leary put $150,000 down for 80% of licensing profits of small photo-book subscription service Groovebook, which was later bought by Shutterfly for $14.5 million, making it one of the show’s biggest acquisitions.

He also had luck with sustainable cleaning-products business Blueland, investing $270,000 for 3% equity and $0.50 per unit royalty until principal was recouped. By 2022, Blueland made over $100 million in lifetime sales and profitability, with its products now flying off the shelves of Target and Whole Foods every 10 seconds.

It’s clear the serial investor has developed a keen eye for what will work well. In addition to the “founder’s mindset,” the serial investor also emphasizes the importance of having a balanced listening-to-talking ratio and strong executional skills, which he says is “impossible to find.” 

He says he didn’t always get the talking-to-listening balance right. Wall Street and Silicon Valley executives may think they should be the loudest and most outspoken people in the room—but taking a backseat and giving others the floor is important, too. Not enough listening and too much talking may stifle great business ideas that get drowned out.

“Reverse the ratio of talking and listening. Most people love to hear themselves talk—I was guilty of that for years, and I’ve reversed it,” O’Leary says. “I listen two thirds of the time, and I talk one third of the time. That’s my new ratio, and it’s much more powerful.”

Lastly, the baby boomer investor looks for unparalleled executional skills. Coming up with the next billion-dollar business venture is one thing, but getting it off the ground is another.

O’Leary looks for founders and teams that can get the job done—even if it takes more than one try. Being an excellent executor doesn’t always mean hitting a home run your first time at bat. Sometimes, O’Leary says, investors and entrepreneurs need a little karma and luck. 

“Great ideas are dime a dozen—executional skills are impossible to find,” O’Leary continues. “I’ve invested in lots of teams over the years that screw up their first deal, they go to zero, and then I invest again, and I get a huge hit, because I know they’re good.

“I’m working on a deal right now with a team that I just finished a great execution with, and hopefully will be good on the second one. I like to work with people that I know have proven executional skills.”

This story was originally featured on Fortune.com

© Christopher Willard / Contributor / Getty Images

Hydrogen fuel cell cars (FCEVs) have been on the market for a similar duration to the current wave of battery EVs (BEVs). But they have sold a tiny fraction in comparison. In 2024, 12,866 FCEVs were registered globally, versus 10.8 million BEVs. Still, some manufacturers have hopes that hydrogen has a role to play in transport.

One of these is BMW, which recently announced it would be bringing its first FCEV into series production in 2028. Fortune caught up with BMW Group’s General Project Manager Hydrogen Technology and Vehicle Projects, Jürgen Guldner, at a recent summit promoting FCEVs, among other hydrogen evangelists.

Toyota has been the leading seller of FCEVs with the Mirai launched in 2014, but it isn’t the only player. Hyundai has been selling its Nexo since 2018, and Honda, after offering various cars under the Clarity name from 2008 to 2021, brought its CR-V e:FCEV plug-in hybrid hydrogen car to market in 2024. BMW has been more cautious. The company has been trialling FCEVs with a pilot run of vehicles based on X5 since 2023. The iX5 Hydrogen is already a credible vehicle, with smooth driving and a familiar X5 interior. However, this won’t necessarily be the vehicle that BMW will launch in 2028.

“The good news is a hydrogen vehicle is an electric vehicle,” says Guldner. “It’s just a different way of storing the energy versus a battery, which also means that we can reuse a lot of the components like the electric motors in the car from our BEVs. It also has a unique value proposition. It’s the best of both worlds, with all the benefits of electric driving—acceleration, silent driving, zero emission—but you can refuel in 3 to 4 minutes and you’re 100% full and ready to go again.”

The problem of hydrogen infrastructure

This has always seemed like a compelling argument for hydrogen on paper, but the reality has been that hydrogen refueling hasn’t proliferated like BEV charging stations. In fact, it has gone backwards in many countries. In the UK, in 2019 there were as many as 15 hydrogen fuel stations, whereas today in 2025 only four were listed, with two potentially not in service. By contrast, according to Zap-Map, there were 39,733 public charging locations in the UK in May 2025, with 80,998 devices and 115,241 connectors. Germany is better served for hydrogen refueling, but some European countries have no stations at all, such as Spain, Portugal and Italy.

Some hydrogen proponents argue that this is a strategic mistake if your goal is to decarbonize road transport.

“FCEVs are complementary to battery electric vehicles and heading towards one common direction,” says David Wong, head of technology and innovation at the Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders. “If you invest in both charging infrastructure and the fuel cell hydrogen refilling infrastructure, the overall cost is lower. We’ve done modelling where they use Germany as an example. It shows that if we have a motor park penetration of 90% BEVs and 10% FCEVs, the overall cost of investing in infrastructure is $40 billion lower than the scenario where 100% of infrastructure is public charge points.”

There is also concern about resource usage when manufacturing BEVs. Guldner points out batteries requires a lot of raw materials, which could lead to scarcity.

“Having a second technology, not putting all eggs in one basket, provides resilience,” he explains. “BMW having two technologies is better than one. We got a lot of feedback from people saying BEVs don’t work for them. We’re thinking about those people who can’t or don’t want to use battery electric cars because maybe they don’t have electric charging at home, or are on the road a lot and don’t want to depend on charging stops, even if you can get them down to maybe 20 minutes. We have issues like towing and cold weather conditions. In the fuel cell you can use excess heat, so you don’t lose any range.”

This still leaves the problem with how you ramp up the infrastructure to support hydrogen. A commercial DC charger might be $50,000, a home charger can cost $1,000, or you can even use a very slow $200 mains plug cable.

But the price for a hydrogen station is much greater—between $1.5 and $2 million, although some estimate as much as $4 million. The solution, at least in the UK, is to target the long-haul commercial sector first and build out from that. HyHAUL is a project aiming to achieve that.

“The biggest challenge with hydrogen is the fact that it works very well at large scale, but not so good at small scale,” says Chris Jackson, CEO and founder of Protium Green Solutions, which co-founded HyHAUL. “One single hydrogen fueling station requires hundreds of passenger cars to make the economics work, but only a very small number of trucks. We are initially developing three major refueling stations and all we need to get the project off the ground is 30 fuel cell trucks. The first stage will be along the M4 corridor. We’ll be covering from Wales all the way into the M25 around London. Over time, we plan to expand across other networks, going up the M5 and M6.”

For consumer adoption of FCEVs, however, it would be necessary to cover the UK completely within half an hour driving distance, which would require about 1,300 stations. One of the reasons why Tesla was able to kickstart the BEV revolution so effectively was its two-pronged approach of building the supportive charging infrastructure to go with its cars.

Automakers developing FCEVs have traditionally left this to third parties, leading to a chicken-and-egg situation where car adoption awaited infrastructure, and vice versa. This has meant that as BEVs have reached a tipping point in many markets, including the UK, EU and China, while FCEVs wait in the wings.

Can fuel cells prevail?

This hasn’t prevented Toyota from persevering with FCEVs. “Our role is to provide customers with choice,” says Jon Hunt, senior manager, Hydrogen Transformation, Toyota GB. “We can’t have people dismissing technologies that are there to enable us all to learn and develop.”

Commercial vehicles could help FCEVs reach that tipping point. In Paris, around 1,000 FCEV taxis have been operated by Hype since 2015, the majority of which are Toyota Mirais. For this reason, Paris has six hydrogen fuel stops with three more being built. This could lay the groundwork for consumers to adopt FCEVs in the city. However, outside Paris there is no supportive infrastructure yet, preventing long journeys beyond the urban limits. Hype has also recently said it is pivoting away from FCEVs to BEVs.

Even with full launch still three years away, BMW is placing a heavy bet on infrastructure having improved sufficiently for hydrogen to be a viable choice for consumers by 2028.

Guldner notes BMW hasn’t yet decided which countries it will bring those vehicles to market, adding that it will depend on the infrastructure.

“Right now, it’s simply not here in the UK. But hopefully in the next few years, development will pick up,” he says.

The exact model that will go into production in 2028 also hasn’t been announced. And while a price hasn’t been unveiled either, BMW is hoping for parity with BEVs, Guldner says, pointing to previous dramatic cost reductions in other technologies like batteries and solar cells.

For these cost reductions to materialize, though, there has to be enough demand for FCEVs to deliver sufficient scale.

“I am always surprised by surveys in newspapers where so many people say they would prefer a hydrogen vehicle over battery power,” he says. “There seems to be demand there.”

The question will be whether these survey responses translate into vehicle sales. In 2028, when BMW launches its production FCEV, we could find out.

This story was originally featured on Fortune.com

© BMW

Key Points

• Nebius and CoreWeave have been in red-hot form on the stock market this year thanks to the terrific demand for their cloud infrastructure solutions.

• Both companies seem to be able to sustain their impressive growth in the long run, thanks to the lucrative AI-related market that they are serving.

• 10 stocks we like better than CoreWeave ›

CoreWeave (NASDAQ: CRWV) and Nebius Group (NASDAQ: NBIS) have witnessed a rapid jump in their share prices this year. Investors have been buying these stocks hand over fist because they are benefiting big time from the growing demand for cloud-based artificial intelligence (AI) infrastructure.

CoreWeave stock has shot up a remarkable 224% in just four months since going public in March this year, and Nebius has clocked healthy gains of 84% so far in 2025. Both companies are in the business of renting out data centers powered by graphics processing units (GPUs), which their customers use to train AI models, build applications, and scale up those applications in the cloud.

Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now. Continue »

But if you have to choose one of these two stocks for your portfolio right now, which one should it be? Let's find out.

The case for CoreWeave

CoreWeave's rally since its initial public offering (IPO) can be attributed to the terrific growth in the company's revenue and backlog. Its top line jumped by more than fivefold in the first quarter to $981 million, and it's on track to sustain its outstanding momentum.

That's because the cloud infrastructure-as-a-service market in which CoreWeave operates is growing at an incredible pace. Grand View Research estimates that the cloud AI market could generate $650 billion in annual revenue in 2030, nearly 7.5 times the size of this market last year. CoreWeave is capitalizing on this lucrative opportunity by offering access to the top-of-the-line GPUs from Nvidia along with server processors from AMD.

The company claims that customers using its cloud AI infrastructure enjoy significant cost and performance advantages. It says its infrastructure is "purpose-built for compute-intensive workloads, and everything from our servers to our storage and networking solutions are designed to deliver best-in-class performance."

The demand for the company's AI infrastructure is outpacing supply, so it is focused on scaling up its capacity quickly to satisfy the strong demand. Management said on its May earnings conference call that it has raised over $21 billion to expand infrastructure and data center capacity.

The company recently announced the upcoming $9 billion acquisition of Core Scientific, which could bring another 1 gigawatt (GW) of data center capacity and help lower its costs from its existing leases with Core Scientific.

CoreWeave forecasts a reduction of over $10 billion in future lease liabilities once the acquisition is complete, followed by annual run-rate cost savings of $500 million by the end of 2027. Before this acquisition was announced, CoreWeave was projecting a fourfold increase in its data center capacity under its existing capacity contracts.

This focus on enhancing data center capacity should pave the way for outstanding growth for CoreWeave since it was sitting on a revenue backlog of almost $26 billion at the end of the first quarter -- 63% higher from the year-ago period. As such, analysts are expecting its revenue to continue increasing at a strong pace.

CRWV Revenue Estimates for Current Fiscal Year; data by YCharts.

CoreWeave is likely to remain a top AI stock since it is serving a fast-growing market and is investing aggressively to capture a share of it.

The case for Nebius

Nebius shot up impressively last week after Goldman Sachs put a 12-month price target of $68 on the stock. The investment bank said that the company's full-stack AI infrastructure, which includes hardware and software tools, allows it to make the most of the impressive opportunity in this space.

Goldman's price target calls for a 31% jump in the stock in the coming year. And there is a good chance that the company could surpass that given its 385% revenue jump year over year in the first quarter to $55 million. More importantly, the growth in its annual revenue run rate was much faster at 684% year over year to $249 million.

That improved to $310 million in April, and the company forecasts an annual revenue run rate of $750 million to $1 billion by the end of the year, driven by the new data center capacity it is planning. In a letter to shareholders, CEO Arkady Volozh said:

We are rapidly expanding our capacity footprint. In just three quarters, we've gone from one location in Finland to five locations across Europe, the U.S., and now the Middle East. We are actively exploring new sites in the U.S. and around the world, and we expect to provide more news on this soon.

Unlike CoreWeave, Nebius provides more than just AI hardware infrastructure to customers. Its cloud platform also offers developer tools and services that customers can employ to refine their AI models, run inference tasks, and develop custom solutions. This is why Goldman believes that Nebius could be a leader in the cloud AI space.

The company's balance sheet -- with $1.45 billion in cash and $188 million in debt -- allows it to continue putting more money into its cloud infrastructure. This explains the healthy top-line growth it is projected to deliver.

NBIS Revenue Estimates for Current Fiscal Year; data by YCharts.

So, like CoreWeave, Nebius is likely to remain a high-growth company. But is it a better buy than its larger peer at this point?

The verdict

Both CoreWeave and Nebius are growing at healthy rates and are expected to sustain that. So, investors should look at their valuations to decide which is the better buy.

The two companies aren't profitable right now considering their aggressive infrastructure investments, so we need to compare their price-to-sales ratios (P/S).

NBIS PS Ratio (Forward); data by YCharts.

Nebius stock is way more expensive than CoreWeave when comparing sales multiples, indicating that the latter is a better buy even after its strong rally this year. Moreover, CoreWeave is growing faster, has a huge backlog, and is sitting on ample resources to continue expanding its data center footprint, making it the easy choice for investors considering which of these two AI stocks is worth adding to their portfolios right now.

Should you invest $1,000 in CoreWeave right now?

Before you buy stock in CoreWeave, consider this:

The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and CoreWeave wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.

Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $636,628!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,063,471!*

Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 1,041% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 183% for the S&P 500. Don’t miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor.

See the 10 stocks »

*Stock Advisor returns as of July 21, 2025

Harsh Chauhan has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Advanced Micro Devices, Goldman Sachs Group, and Nvidia. The Motley Fool recommends Nebius Group. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Key Points

• Netflix is opening Netflix Houses in select U.S. cities, which will bring its popular shows and movies to life.

• Disney is second-to-none when it comes to physical experiences, a segment that rakes in substantial profits.

• Netflix dominates the current media landscape, so a major shift in strategy isn’t necessary.

• 10 stocks we like better than Netflix ›

In the past decade, Netflix (NASDAQ: NFLX) shares have soared 955%. Just this year (as of July 23), they are up 32%. With this type of stellar performance, it seems the business can do no wrong.

However, there is one area Netflix has yet to tap: Theme parks. The company has become a dominant media and entertainment enterprise, but it's presence in the physical world is nonexistent.

Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now. Continue »

This puts Netflix behind a peer like Walt Disney (NYSE: DIS), which owns and operates seven of the 10 most visited theme parks on the face of the planet. Not to mention the cruise ships that Disney also has. Maybe Netflix is staring at an obvious opportunity here to grow its revenue and fan base.

Should the top streaming stock become more like the House of Mouse? Here's how investors should view this situation from a strategic and financial perspective.

Creating a flywheel

Disney has unmatched intellectual property (IP), which helps support its flywheel. People might watch a new Marvel movie or series and immediately want to experience these characters in real life, so they visit Walt Disney World to ride the Guardians of the Galaxy: Cosmic Rewind roller coaster. They might also buy merchandise. It's a situation where all the pieces fortify Disney's competitive position, allowing it to develop deeper and longer-lasting connections with its fans.

Creating physical experiences can help Netflix bolster its brand in the same way. For what it's worth, the company plans to launch Netflix Houses in Dallas and Philadelphia this year, and in Las Vegas in 2027. These are permanent, but small-format (about 100,000 square feet) setups located in shopping malls. There are interactive experiences, dining options, and retail stores.

It's encouraging to see Netflix test the waters when it comes to physical experiences. It might not have the breadth and depth of IP that Disney has, especially when it comes to content for kids and families, but it has extremely popular shows and movies that people love. It's probably best that Netflix isn't going full steam ahead with building an actual theme park, as it likely won't be able to compete with Disney's dominance, or with Comcast's Universal Studios.

Financial implications

When making these kinds of strategic decisions, what matters most is the potential they can have for financial success. Disney's Experiences segment is its most profitable. In fiscal 2024 (ended Sept. 28, 2024), this division raked in $9.3 billion in operating income on $34.2 billion in revenue.

Netflix reported $6.9 billion in free cash flow in 2024, with a forecast to bring in between $8 billion and $8.5 billion this year. Investing in building out theme parks would require huge capital expenditure commitments that would certainly dent Netflix's strong financial position. Return on invested capital is a key metric that management teams should think about when allocating cash to its best use. Developing physical experiences at Disney's level would take resources away from creating top-notch content that the company is known for.

In September 2023, Disney announced that it was going to spend $60 billion over the next decade to expand its Experiences segment. That's a massive undertaking that Netflix can avoid.

Netflix is doing just fine

The media industry, which is now being driven by the streaming model, is extremely competitive. There are many businesses vying for viewer attention, so it's always important to figure out ways of standing out. But Netflix reigns supreme, with more than 300 million subscribers worldwide. It's operating from a position of strength with the upcoming launch of Netflix Houses.

Netflix doesn't need to be more like Disney. The former continues to fire on all cylinders. The opposite argument holds more weight, with Disney needing to be more like Netflix -- at least when it comes to the House of Mouse's streaming segment that just became profitable not too long ago.

Should you invest $1,000 in Netflix right now?

Before you buy stock in Netflix, consider this:

The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Netflix wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.

Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $636,628!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,063,471!*

Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 1,041% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 183% for the S&P 500. Don’t miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor.

See the 10 stocks »

*Stock Advisor returns as of July 21, 2025

Neil Patel has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Netflix and Walt Disney. The Motley Fool recommends Comcast. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Key Points

• Analysts have been downgrading BYD's full-year delivery forecast.

• BYD is currently on pace to fall short of 2025 delivery estimates.

• BYD is facing a challenging Chinese market amid a brutal price war.

• 10 stocks we like better than BYD Company ›

Over the past few years, BYD investors have been spoiled. The Chinese electric vehicle (EV) juggernaut swept through the country's domestic EV market with relative ease and then applied tremendous pricing pressure with a long list of highly affordable and compelling EV vehicle options. While BYD has been a no brainer winner over the past five years with its stock trading nearly 380% higher over that time, it might finally be showing signs of slowing down.

Time to jump off the BYD hype train?

BYD's monthly sales and deliveries have stagnated over the summer months, which are traditionally slower selling months, providing fresh challenges for China's EV giant. Not only is BYD dealing with slowing sales, but it's also being reprimanded vocally by the Chinese government for applying so much pressure on pricing that it's caused a race to the bottom, slowly but surely eating away at industry margins. BYD slashed prices by as much as 34% in May, causing increased government scrutiny on the industry.

Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now. Learn More »

In fact, in what would be a rare miss for the top Chinese EV maker, the company looks like it's going to fall short of its annual sales target for 2025. BYD would need to sell roughly 560,000 units monthly through December to hit its sales target, which would be more vehicles sold in one month than it ever has in its history -- BYD sold just short of 515,000 vehicles last December.

And now analysts are stumbling over themselves to downgrade BYD's annual sales estimates. In fact, Deutsche Bank AG said it now expects BYD to deliver 5 million in wholesales, which is simply deliveries to dealer networks, which breaks down into 4 million domestic deliveries and 1 million overseas as the company continues its global expansion.

Morgan Stanley lowered its delivery projection to 5.3 million last month, noting that a smaller number of new models would be a drag on company deliveries. Perhaps even worse yet, Bloomberg Intelligence's Joanne Chen said BYD will be forced to sacrifice some profits, while maintaining large incentives and discounting, if it wants to stay on track and have a chance at reaching its delivery estimates.

"Regulatory scrutiny will temper direct cuts to vehicle sticker prices but competition isn't going away and retail promotions are still needed to sustain sales momentum," Chen said, according to Automotive News. "New model roll outs and steady tech upgrade are also crucial."

Global expansion

Further, when you back out BYD's global expansion and the estimated deliveries overseas, investors will see that BYD's domestic car deliveries in China are shrinking. In June, domestic deliveries slipped 8%, compared to the prior year. HSBC data shows that Geely was the largest gainer of market share during the first half of 2025, while BYD was one of the biggest losers.

Back to looking at BYD's global expansion, while the company is on pace to reach its forecast of 800,000 overseas deliveries, it still faces challenges in two emerging markets: Saudi Arabia and India. Both markets are potentially huge, but Saudi Arabia has EV market share of just 1% of total sales and faces high costs, charging infrastructure challenges, and extreme temperatures that make EV adoption slower in the region. India, the world's third largest automotive market, has similar problems and substantial tariff headwinds that can increase the cost of imported vehicles by 100% in some cases.

Ultimately, investors should prepare for an inevitable slowdown in BYD's expansion after years of rocketing higher in deliveries and stock price. That said, eventually it's likely that BYD and other Chinese automakers will enter the U.S. market, and that could provide the company's next massive boost in deliveries and financials -- but when that will happen is anyone's guess. Long-term investors should stay the course because even if BYD slows down from its rapid rise it's still in an incredible position to thrive globally in the years ahead.

Should you invest $1,000 in BYD Company right now?

Before you buy stock in BYD Company, consider this:

The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and BYD Company wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.

Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $636,628!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,063,471!*

Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 1,041% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 183% for the S&P 500. Don’t miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor.

See the 10 stocks »

*Stock Advisor returns as of July 21, 2025

HSBC Holdings is an advertising partner of Motley Fool Money. Daniel Miller has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends BYD Company and HSBC Holdings. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Key Points

• PepsiCo's stock popped after the company reported unexpectedly strong second -quarter 2025 earnings.

• The stock remains mired in a deep downturn.

• One quarter isn't a trend, but this Dividend King has proved it knows how to adapt over the long term.

• 10 stocks we like better than PepsiCo ›

PepsiCo (NASDAQ: PEP) announced second-quarter 2025 earnings that were stronger than Wall Street expected. The stock popped 6% the next day, which is great. But it is a typical short-term, news-driven move that probably shouldn't be too important to long-term investors.

The bigger story here is that the stock remains well off its highs, which makes it a buy if you are worried about a bear market. Here are three reasons why.

Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now. Learn More »

1. PepsiCo is a consumer staples company

PepsiCo makes beverages, salty snacks, and packaged foods. It owns some of the most iconic brands around, including Pepsi, Frito-Lay, and Quaker Oats.

Its size, distribution strength, marketing prowess, and research and development acumen make it a valuable partner to retailers around the world. It is highly unlikely that PepsiCo goes away anytime soon.

And there's a key feature here that is important to remember: PepsiCo makes affordable products that are bought regularly and have high brand loyalty among customers. This is the core of why consumer staples companies are resilient to economic downturns and are often sought out by investors as safe havens during bear markets. PepsiCo's business, while it will vary a bit over short periods of time, is really fairly stable, with a slight growth bias over the long term.

If you are worried about a bear market, consumer staples stocks are a great place to go fishing for new investments. Notice that statement is broad and not specific to PepsiCo. Which brings up the next point: its stock price.

PEP data by YCharts.

2. It's already in its own bear market

Without getting too deep into the details, PepsiCo hasn't been firing on all cylinders lately. Some of its peers, notably Coca-Cola (NYSE: KO), have been performing better. Thus, Wall Street has been downbeat on PepsiCo's stock.

Even after the pop following unexpectedly strong second-quarter 2025 earnings, shares remain down more than 20% from their 2023 highs. A bear market is when the broader indexes fall 20% or more, so PepsiCo is kind of in its own private bear market already.

A market-wide downturn could easily lead investors to seek out safe havens, like already downtrodden consumer staples makers. PepsiCo could quickly find itself gaining favor again in that scenario.

And even if that positive shift doesn't happen, given the already deep drawdown, it seems likely that the stock wouldn't suffer as much as the broader market in a downturn.

3. PepsiCo has a proven record of survival

The final reason to consider buying PepsiCo if you are worried about a bear market is its status as a Dividend King. With over five decades of annual dividend increases, the company has proved it knows how to survive bear markets, recessions, and whatever else the world can throw at it. Simply put, you don't create a dividend record like that by accident.

On this front, you might also want to pay attention to the stock's historically high dividend yield of around 4% or so. Basically, you are getting paid very well to own this reliable dividend stock, and that can help you wait out a broader market downturn without losing your cool.

PepsiCo is muddling through again

To reiterate, PepsiCo is not operating at the top of its game right now. That said, it is making moves to get back into form, including cutting costs and acquiring new, more relevant brands, among other things.

It is basically doing the right things from a business perspective. Add that to what is really a pretty reliable business, the deep decline in the stock price, and an attractive dividend yield, and this dividend stalwart looks like a buy even if you aren't worried about a bear market!

Should you invest $1,000 in PepsiCo right now?

Before you buy stock in PepsiCo, consider this:

The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and PepsiCo wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.

Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $636,628!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,063,471!*

Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 1,041% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 183% for the S&P 500. Don’t miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor.

See the 10 stocks »

*Stock Advisor returns as of July 21, 2025

Reuben Gregg Brewer has positions in PepsiCo. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Key Points

• The One Big, Beautiful Bill (OBBB) added a new $6,000 senior tax deduction.

• This will help many -- but not all -- seniors on Social Security save money on taxes.

• It's a far cry from the savings that would come from actually ending Social Security benefit taxes.

• The $23,760 Social Security bonus most retirees completely overlook ›

"Promises made, promises kept." That's how a recent White House article celebrated the One Big, Beautiful Bill's (OBBB) new senior tax deduction, set to take effect for the 2025 tax year. The Trump administration has claimed that, as a result of this change, 88% of seniors on Social Security won't owe any taxes on their Social Security benefits -- a follow-through on one of President Donald Trump's biggest campaign promises.

It certainly sounds compelling, but as someone who's been writing about Social Security for years, it only took me one look at the data to realize that the OBBB change was far from an end to benefit taxes. The new deduction will help many seniors to a degree, but you need to understand what it is -- and isn't -- to know what kind of a difference it will make for you.

Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now. Continue »

How the OBBB senior tax deduction works

The OBBB added a new $6,000 tax deduction for seniors 65 and older ($12,000 for married couples). This is on top of the standard deduction for their filing status, which the law also increased from $15,000 to $15,750 for single adults and from $30,000 to $31,500 for married couples, and the existing senior tax deduction ($2,000 for an individual or $1,600 per qualifying individual for a married couple).

Tax deductions reduce the portion of your income you have to pay taxes on. For example, if you earned $50,000 this year and qualified for $15,000 in tax deductions, you'd only owe taxes on the remaining $35,000. So the OBBB change is definitely useful. It means you'll owe taxes on less money than you did before.

That said, not everyone will be able to take advantage of this new deduction. Single adults with incomes over $75,000 and married couples with incomes over $150,000 will see their deduction decrease by $60 for every $1,000 by which their income exceeds these thresholds. Single adults with incomes greater than $175,000 and married couples with incomes exceeding $250,000 won't be able to claim the new deduction at all.

So far, we can already see two key differences between the OBBB senior deduction and Trump's promise to end benefit taxes. Seniors under 65 receive no benefit from the OBBB deduction, even if they're on Social Security, and high earners who would have benefited from ending benefit taxes will experience no gains from this new change. But there's another big distinction to be made between Trump's promise and what he delivered.

The tax savings fall far short of what Trump promised

The OBBB senior tax deduction will give the average senior about $670 more in after-tax income, according to a Council for Economic Advisors report. But that's a far cry from the gains that would come from ending the benefit taxes that are still on the books, even after the OBBB's passing.

Let's look at the example of a single 65-year-old who takes $50,000 from a 401(k) in 2025 and has annual Social Security benefits of $24,000. The government decides what percentage of your Social Security benefits to tax by looking at your provisional income -- your adjusted gross income (AGI), plus any nontaxable interest from municipal bonds, and half your annual Social Security benefit. In this case, that's $62,000.

Then, it compares this amount to the following chart.

Marital Status	0% of Benefits Taxable If Provisional Income Is Below:	Up to 50% of Benefits Taxable If Provisional Income Is Between:	Up to 85% of Benefits Taxable If Provisional Income Exceeds:
Single	$25,000	$25,000 and $34,000	$34,000
Married	$32,000	$32,000 and $44,000	$44,000

Data source: Social Security Administration.

Under Social Security benefit tax rules, 85% of their benefits would be taxable and get added to their AGI, bringing it to $70,400. So what does this mean for their taxes?

The following table outlines this person's tax bill under pre-OBBB law, with the new OBBB standard and senior deductions in place, and in a scenario where the OBBB hadn't passed and benefit taxes were eliminated instead.

	Pre-OBBB Law	With OBBB Senior Deduction	If Benefit Taxes Were Eliminated
401(k) Withdrawals	$50,000	$50,000	$50,000
Social Security Benefits	$24,000	$24,000	$24,000
Adjusted Gross Income (AGI)	$70,400 ($50,000 from 401(k) + $20,400 of SS benefits)	$70,400 ($50,000 from 401(k) + $20,400 of SS benefits)	$50,000 from 401(k)
Standard Deduction for Single Filers	$15,000	$15,750	$15,000
Senior Deduction	$2,000	$8,000	$2,000
Taxable Income	$53,400	$46,650	$33,000
Taxes Owed	$6,662.00	$5,359.50	$3,721.50

Source: Author's calculations.

In this example, the OBBB senior deduction and the increase to the standard deduction for all single filers would result in $1,302.50 in tax savings. However, eliminating Social Security benefit taxes would've saved $2,940.50 in taxes, even without the new deductions in place.

So the Council of Economic Advisors' claim that 88% of seniors on Social Security won't pay any benefit taxes isn't accurate. The report says this is a result of "their total deductions exceeding their taxable Social Security benefits." But if we follow this logic, we could say that single filers who had $16,550 or less in taxable Social Security benefits in 2024 (equal to the $14,600 standard deduction for single filers plus the $1,950 senior deduction that year) didn't pay taxes on their Social Security benefits, when we know that's not true. If you have taxable Social Security benefits, you are paying taxes on them.

The OBBB didn't do anything to change how benefit taxation works. An increasing number of seniors will encounter this tax as average benefits and living costs continue to rise. The OBBB's new senior deduction may provide a bit of relief, but it's a small gain compared to Trump's initial promise.

It's also, for the moment, a limited-time offer. The law says it only applies until the 2028 tax year. Congress will have to decide whether to extend it for future years.

Whether the government will actually end benefit taxes remains an open question. Many seniors want it to do so, but with Social Security facing insolvency, the program could really use the benefit tax revenue right now. However, if Congress makes broader changes to the program in the next few years to keep it sustainable for future generations, talk of ending benefit taxes may resurface.

The $23,760 Social Security bonus most retirees completely overlook

If you're like most Americans, you're a few years (or more) behind on your retirement savings. But a handful of little-known "Social Security secrets" could help ensure a boost in your retirement income.

One easy trick could pay you as much as $23,760 more... each year! Once you learn how to maximize your Social Security benefits, we think you could retire confidently with the peace of mind we're all after. Join Stock Advisor to learn more about these strategies.

View the "Social Security secrets" »

The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Key Points

• Realty Income is a large and high-yield net lease REIT.

• The stock is likely to be a slow and steady tortoise.

• Don't underestimate the power of dividend reliability.

• 10 stocks we like better than Realty Income ›

If you invested $10,000 in Realty Income (NYSE: O) at the turn of the last century, it would be worth around $56,000 today. That is a long way off from $1 million, but don't look at this result in a vacuum. The truth is, Realty Income has outperformed the S&P 500 index (SNPINDEX: ^GSPC) over that span. And even if Realty Income can't repeat that feat, there's still a very good reason to own this high-yield real estate investment trust (REIT). Here's what you need to know.

Times have changed, but history is important

Back at the turn of the century, REITs were still a somewhat obscure asset class. In fact, they remained a niche segment of the financial sector until 2014, when real estate finally got its own sector designation. Ultimately, way back in 2000, REITs weren't well followed and were largely the purview of small, income-oriented investors. A material portion of the growth over the past 25 or so years has come from the inclusion of REITs in the portfolios of larger investors.

Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now. Continue »

But the performance numbers are still interesting to consider. The growth of $10K noted above for Realty Income compares to the same investment increasing to roughly $43,000 for the S&P 500 index. That, however, is a price-only figure. That same amount with dividend reinvestment would have grown to nearly $68,000 in the S&P 500 and, hold your hat, over $230,000 for Realty Income.

O data by YCharts

How is that possible? The answer is that back in the 2000s, Realty Income's yield was quite high. Compounding the dividend via dividend reinvestment supercharged the stock's total returns. The S&P 500's yield wasn't nearly as high. So, Realty Income benefited from both the increase in price that came with the broader acceptance of the REIT asset class and its lofty, and steadily growing, dividend.

What's the future going to look like?

Obviously, the future is unknowable. However, given the past, Realty Income is likely to be a reliable dividend stock. It has increased its dividend annually for 30 consecutive years. If it keeps that up, even though growth is generally fairly modest in any given year, it will be a solid foundation for a broader income portfolio.

But there's another bit to consider here. While Realty Income's dividend yield isn't as high as it was back when REITs were less popular, it is still pretty high at roughly 5.6%. For comparison, the S&P 500's yield is only about 1.2%. Compounding that dividend will still help to supercharge Realty Income's return.

But that's not the only thing worth noting. Realty Income's stock price is down around 30% from the highs it reached prior to the coronavirus pandemic. That suggests that there is some recovery potential here to go along with the lofty dividend. Put the two together, and investors could see pretty attractive and reliable long-term returns over time.

Realty Income is a foundational investment

That said, Realty Income isn't going to excite you. But that's the point of buying this REIT. It is a boring and slow-growth business that will provide you with a lofty yield. You can pair it with lower-yielding but higher-growth investments to create a portfolio that will help turn you into a millionaire. That's the value of a $10,000 or $100,000 investment in Realty Income. It can give you the emotional and financial strength to take on the kind of investment risks that will drive the value of your portfolio into seven figures. And yet, as history shows, this REIT, which has outperformed the S&P 500, is anything but dead money.

Should you invest $1,000 in Realty Income right now?

Before you buy stock in Realty Income, consider this:

The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Realty Income wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.

Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $636,628!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,063,471!*

Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 1,041% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 183% for the S&P 500. Don’t miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor.

See the 10 stocks »

*Stock Advisor returns as of July 21, 2025

Reuben Gregg Brewer has positions in Realty Income. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Realty Income. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Key Points

• Many asset managers are migrating their assets to be tracked by blockchains.

• Both Solana and XRP stand to capture inflows related to this migration.

• But, at least so far, they're excelling in very different classes of tokenized assets.

• 10 stocks we like better than XRP ›

Smart investors know that you don't need to swing at every pitch. Sometimes, simply parking a modest sum in the right play before the crowd arrives can reap outsize rewards. A fast-maturing corner of crypto -- real-world asset (RWA) tokenization -- offers that setup today as it moves stocks, bonds, and other traditional instruments onto blockchains for cheaper, faster settlement compared to existing financial technologies.

Two coins already capturing some of the capital flows related to tokenization are Solana (CRYPTO: SOL) and XRP (CRYPTO: XRP). They approach the megatrend of asset tokenization slightly differently, giving investors a paired bet on whatever flavors of tokenized finance proliferate next. Even a relatively modest investment of $1,500 could be intelligently allocated into either of these two coins, so let's investigate both. And I suggest holding for at least three years.

Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now. Learn More »

This chain is a speed specialist

Solana's chief selling points are its throughput and its cheapness.

The network routinely clears more than 1,000 transactions per second (TPS) at sub-penny fees, letting developers iterate without worrying that usage spikes will crush users' wallets. That has proved invaluable for tokenized stocks. After a platform called xStocks launched on the chain in late May, the value of stock tokens on Solana tripled to about $48 million within three weeks; as of late July, the chain's tokenized stocks are worth more than $102 million.

Zoom out, and the corpus of tokenized assets on Solana now stands near $553 million, up by more than 218% this year alone, which is more than double the sector's overall growth.

The chain is thus emerging as a natural magnet for asset issuers experimenting with tech that's beyond their traditional venues.

If Boston Consulting Group's projection that the sum of tokenized real-world assets will reach $16 trillion by 2030 is even half-right, a rising tide of assets would keep nudging validators to lock up Solana for staking, tightening supply. Furthermore, asset issuers will need to buy and hold the coin to manage their tokens, not to mention parking at least some of their fiat currency on the chain as stablecoins.

Regulatory surprises remain the main risk here, as tokenized stocks and funds live in (partially) uncharted territory. But, that risk seems likely going to get resolved within the next few years thanks to new leadership at the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), and when it does, the chain would pick up a new tailwind in the form of regulatory clarity.

Buying $1,500 worth of Solana and holding it through then is thus a favorable course of action.

This institutional plumber is carving a compliance moat

Where Solana thrives on raw speed, the XRP Ledger (XRPL) is a money transfer and asset-tracking system that embeds the (boring but essential) features banks actually ask for, like account freezing tools, native blacklisting, and built-in identity layers that satisfy know-your-customer (KYC) rules without the need to bolt on third-party widgets. Those controls are attracting issuers of regulated debt and payment instruments, which are the (once again, boring but essential) enormous backbone of finance.

XRP now has roughly $133 million in tokenized assets on its chain, up from under $50 million a year ago. That footprint is small compared to other chains like Ethereum, but its composition skews toward institutional debt rather than stocks. Every new bond or payment token minted consumes XRP for fees, subtly trimming float and sharpening its scarcity narrative.

Whereas one of Solana's strong points so far has been with tokenized stocks, XRP's advantage at the moment is in its deeply liquid tokenized U.S. Treasury bill platform, worth $75.2 million, which is something that banks and other financial institutions need. When those players use XRP as part of their financial back end, they gain a significant advantage from being able to tap into borrowing those Treasuries natively on-chain. Furthermore, the ledger's tight compliance posture also reduces headline risk, as institutions can adopt the coin without cobbling together legal patchwork like they'd need to do with Ethereum-based solutions.

Of course, the chain relies entirely on the business development muscle of Ripple, the business which issues XRP. Should legal or strategic missteps slow institutional partner onboarding, the coin's growth would stall. Still, the chain's design speaks the language of regulators, which is a competitive advantage that compounds as rules tighten worldwide and as larger players (with heftier compliance requirements) enter the crypto space.

Over the coming years, as institutions pile into crypto to take advantage of its technology, few chains are better positioned than XRP. And that's why it's worth buying with $1,500 today, and holding for at least three years.

Should you invest $1,000 in XRP right now?

Before you buy stock in XRP, consider this:

The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and XRP wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.

Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $636,628!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,063,471!*

Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 1,041% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 183% for the S&P 500. Don’t miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor.

See the 10 stocks »

*Stock Advisor returns as of July 21, 2025

Alex Carchidi has positions in Ethereum and Solana. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Ethereum, Solana, and XRP. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Key Points

• Fintech stocks are hot, as the risk-on sentiment has swept the market.

• Upstart is thriving after updating its AI model and making some other key changes.

• Sezzle is delivering sizzling growth thanks to a differentiated approach to BNPL.

• 10 stocks we like better than Upstart ›

Fintech stocks have long been volatile. The sector surged during the pandemic before crashing in the 2022 bear market. However, as digital payments continue to take share from traditional forms of payment and AI ups the stakes in fintech, sector stocks have started to rally again, benefiting from the broader risk-on sentiment since President Trump paused the Liberation Day tariffs.

Several fintech stocks have soared since then, but there are two in particular that look poised to deliver multibagging returns if you have a little bit of cash to invest. Let's take a closer look.

Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now. Learn More »

1. Upstart Holdings

Upstart (NASDAQ: UPST) was a fintech darling of the pandemic era as the stock posted triple-digit growth and delivered double-digit profit margins. However, when interest rates rose, demand for loans from its platform dried up, profits disappeared, and the stock was forgotten.

Since then, Upstart has improved its technology with better models that have led to higher conversion rates. It has strengthened its capital with new funding sources and streamlined its business, and now expects to be profitable again this year.

In addition to those improvements, Upstart is starting to tap into massive loan markets in auto and home as it continues to roll out those offerings in new states. As a result, the business is stronger than ever, though that's not reflected in its stock price. While Upstart stock has gained in recent weeks, the stock is still down roughly 80% from its peak in 2021, and its market cap is just $7 billion.

For a company chasing a massive addressable market and trying to disrupt traditional FICO scores, Upstart has the potential to be much larger than a $7 billion company, especially if interest rates fall again, stimulating loan demand. Even at current interest rates, the business is thriving. In the first quarter, revenue rose 67% to $213 million as fee revenue climbed 34% to $185 million.

Transaction volume doubled to 240,706, showing the benefit of its new, more advanced Model 18. If Upstart can maintain its momentum, the upside potential from here is considerable.

2. Sezzle

Like Upstart, Buy now, pay later (BNPL) companies also had a moment during the pandemic, soaring as demand for the new kind of payment took off before interest in the sector faded in the 2022 bear market.

However, BNPL hasn't gone away, and one of the fastest-growing companies in the space is now Sezzle (NASDAQ: SEZL), a BNPL that initially went public in Australia and has grown its business with a different strategy from most of its competitors. Instead of focusing on the merchant, Sezzle has prioritized the consumer, growing its business through subscription programs, rewards, and new product features like auto-couponing, which automatically finds coupons for customers as they shop.

That strategy seems to be resonating as Sezzle's growth rate has accelerated into the triple digits.

In its first quarter, the company reported revenue growth of 123% to $104.9 million as gross merchandise volume (GMV) rose 64.1% to $808.7 million.

Sezzle's profit margins have also soared alongside that growth as the company reported an operating margin of nearly 50%, showing the business model is highly scalable. The company has also managed its credit risk successfully, and cuts customers off from the product if they miss a payment.

Investors are valuing the stock like its growth story is coming to an end, but BNPL is also a massive addressable market, competing with credit cards, so there's plenty of runway for the company to grow.

At a market cap of $4.5 billion, the stock could easily be a multibagger from here, even as it's already up more than 800% over the past year.

Should you invest $1,000 in Upstart right now?

Before you buy stock in Upstart, consider this:

The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Upstart wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.

Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $636,628!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,063,471!*

Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 1,041% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 183% for the S&P 500. Don’t miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor.

See the 10 stocks »

*Stock Advisor returns as of July 21, 2025

Jeremy Bowman has positions in Upstart. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Sezzle and Upstart. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Key Points

• Banks provide what amounts to a necessity service in today's connected world.

• The Great Recession proved that some banks are more resilient than others.

• If you are looking to maximize your dividend income, this ultra-high-yield bank should be on your short list.

• 10 stocks we like better than Bank Of Nova Scotia ›

Banks aren't supposed to be exciting. They are supposed to provide basic services that help the world function on the financial front. Boring is good, but it often doesn't lead to a stock that has an ultra-high dividend yield. That said, Bank of Nova Scotia (NYSE: BNS) is boring enough to buy but "exciting" enough to have a lofty dividend yield. Here's why you might want to jump on this ultra-high-yield bank if you have $10,000 to invest right now.

What does Bank of Nova Scotia do?

Bank of Nova Scotia, which generally goes by the nickname Scotiabank, isn't particularly different from most other large banks. It provides customers with the basics, like bank accounts, checking accounts, and mortgages. It deals with business customers, too. But on top of that it also adds things like wealth management and investment banking. In this way it not only competes with local banks, but also with giants like Bank of America or Citigroup.

Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now. Learn More »

That said, there's a key difference here that is important to keep in mind. Scotiabank hails from Canada. Canadian banking regulations are very stringent, leading the largest of the country's banks, of which Scotiabank is one, to have entrenched industry positions. The heavy regulation has also resulted in Canadian banks having a conservative ethos that permeates all aspects of their businesses. All in, Scotiabank has a very solid business foundation.

The best display of this comes from Scotiabank's dividend. It has paid a dividend continuously since it started paying a dividend in 1833. That said, the dividend hasn't increased every single year (more on this below), but it also didn't get cut during the 2007 to 2009 financial crises. The Great Recession, as that deep recessionary period is known, led both Citigroup and Bank of America to cut their dividends.

So it stands out on the dividend front for its consistency. But it also stands out because of the huge 5.7% dividend yield. For reference, the S&P 500 index (SNPINDEX: ^GSPC) is yielding just 1.2% and the average bank has a yield of 2.5%.

BNS Dividend Yield data by YCharts

Why such a high yield from Scotiabank?

Scotiabank's yield would suggest that it is a risky bank. And yet its core Canadian operations would suggest the exact opposite. What's going on? As it turns out, like other Canadian banks, Scotiabank has looked to foreign markets for growth. Most of its peers chose to focus on the U.S. market, but Scotiabank sought to differentiate itself by focusing on Central and South America. That didn't work out quite as well as hoped.

It has since shifted gears, getting out of less desirable markets and focusing on becoming a leading Mexico to Canada bank, as it attempts to bulk up its business in the United States. This overhaul resulted in the dividend not being increased in 2024. However, Scotiabank has made quick progress, and it started increasing its dividend again in 2025.

That doesn't mean the transition process is complete, but it does signal that the board and management are confident in the progress the company is making. All in, Scotiabank looks like a fairly low-risk turnaround story that comes with a very attractive dividend yield. While there's more work to be done, you are being paid well to stick around.

A sizable chunk of Scotiabank stock

A $10,000 investment in Scotiabank today will get a dividend investor a bit over 175 shares of the Canadian bank giant. And it will get you access to a well-above-market and well-above-peer dividend yield. But the key is that the yield is supported by a conservatively run bank that is moving its business in a positive direction.

Should you invest $1,000 in Bank Of Nova Scotia right now?

Before you buy stock in Bank Of Nova Scotia, consider this:

The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Bank Of Nova Scotia wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.

Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $636,628!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,063,471!*

Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 1,041% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 183% for the S&P 500. Don’t miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor.

See the 10 stocks »

*Stock Advisor returns as of July 21, 2025

Citigroup is an advertising partner of Motley Fool Money. Bank of America is an advertising partner of Motley Fool Money. Reuben Gregg Brewer has positions in Bank Of Nova Scotia. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Vanguard S&P 500 ETF. The Motley Fool recommends Bank Of Nova Scotia. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Key Points

• Joby Aviation's business model differs significantly from that of its peers.

• There's reason to believe its vertically integrated strategy will win out.

• The upside potential is significant; provided the certification process goes smoothly, Joby has a big future.

• 10 stocks we like better than Joby Aviation ›

The electric vertical take-off and landing (eVTOL) market is crowded, but that doesn't mean it's a winner-takes-all scenario. Different companies have different business models with varying risks and rewards, and Joby Aviation (NYSE: JOBY) is arguably the one with the most reward and also one that's reducing its risk the most in 2025. Is it enough to make it a stock that could set investors up for life? Here's the lowdown.

What makes Joby Aviation different

It's always interesting to compare competitors across a growth industry, and doing so with Joby's peer Archer Aviation (NYSE: ACHR) makes for a fascinating comparison. The first conclusion is that they have significantly different models. The second is that the nature of their models allows for more than enough room for both in the market, and the third is that Joby Aviation is making real progress in de-risking the elements of its business that are subject to greater market uncertainty.

Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now. Learn More »

In a nutshell, you can think of Joby Aviation as a "go it alone" player in the industry, backed by a heavyweight manufacturing partner in Toyota, as well as other investors such as Uber and Delta Air Lines. Its business model is different from Archer's and the rest of the industry in two key ways:

• Joby Aviation doesn't plan to sell its aircraft and prefers to develop much of its technology in-house, having its own powertrain and electronics manufacturing facility in California.
• As quoted from its Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filings, Joby plans to "own and operate our aircraft ourselves, building a vertically integrated transportation company that will deliver transportation services to customers."

Both points are crucial to understanding the investment case.

Joby's in-house development

Archer, along with other eVTOL companies such as Germany's Lilium and the U.K.'s Vertical Aerospace, makes no secret of the fact that it has leading aerospace and automotive companies as partners in providing solutions. The advantage of heavy integration with established partners in developing technology is a simplified and less risky process, which, theoretically, leads to earlier certification.

For example, Archer partners with Honeywell for actuators and climate systems, Hexcel for advanced composite materials, Safran for avionics, and Stellantis (also a key investor). Honeywell is a key strategic technology partner of Vertical Aerospace and partners with European aerospace companies GKN and Leonardo.

Lilium partners with GE Aerospace in flight data management and Honeywell (also an investor) for flight control, avionics, and propulsion unit sensors.

As such, Joby's more "go it alone" approach could be deemed more risky. However, it has received significant investment (up to $894 million) from a manufacturing heavyweight, Toyota. Moreover, the Japanese giant is assisting in improving Joby's manufacturing processes and optimizing design.

A vertically integrated transportation company

Here again, Joby is different. It doesn't want to sell its aircraft; instead, it wants to handle the commercialization of transportation services itself. Again, this is a more risky business model, as it implies commercial business expertise in addition to research & development and manufacturing expertise. It's somewhat akin to Boeing or Airbus deciding to operate an airline.

On the other hand, there's a reason why Uber has invested $125 million in Joby so far: the obvious potential to integrate their services. Similarly, Delta Air Lines is investing up to $200 million in Joby to transport passengers to airports. With Delta increasingly focusing on premium travelers and looking to offer experiences that engender loyalty, the Joby tie-in is a significant plus.

Can Joby Aviation be a life-changing investment?

Given the current trends in the global economy, whereby technology is enabling fundamental shifts in how industrial and transportation companies operate (think Tesla selling direct or Uber not needing to own cars), Joby's business model makes perfect sense and has the potential to create more value for shareholders over the long term.

Meanwhile, while its peers are working with leading aerospace companies, Toyota is a formidable manufacturing entity and partner, and the Toyota Production System is the precursor to all the lean manufacturing practices successfully implemented by GE Aerospace and many others.

There are no guarantees in nascent technology fields such as eVTOL, and diversification is key when investing in growth stocks. Still, Joby Aviation is a strong candidate for an investment that could set you up for life.

Should you invest $1,000 in Joby Aviation right now?

Before you buy stock in Joby Aviation, consider this:

The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Joby Aviation wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.

Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $636,628!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,063,471!*

Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 1,041% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 183% for the S&P 500. Don’t miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor.

See the 10 stocks »

*Stock Advisor returns as of July 21, 2025

Lee Samaha has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Uber Technologies. The Motley Fool recommends Delta Air Lines, GE Aerospace, Hexcel, and Stellantis. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Key Points

• Nvidia has ownership stakes in "neocloud" companies Nebius Group and CoreWeave.

• While each company is positioned to benefit from investments in AI infrastructure, CoreWeave's growth prospects appear more robust over the long term.

• Wall Street is forecasting CoreWeave's revenue to triple over the next couple of years, which should help pave a path to profitability.

• 10 stocks we like better than CoreWeave ›

Following the end of each quarter, financial services firms that manage over $100 million in stocks are required to file a form 13F with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). These filings represent an itemized breakdown of all the stocks that the fund bought and sold during the most recent quarter.

While investors may not realize it, corporations can also invest their cash into equity positions of other businesses. According to Nvidia's recent 13F filing, the semiconductor darling currently holds positions across six stocks. Two of its holdings are spread between artificial intelligence (AI) data center stocks, Nebius Group and CoreWeave (NASDAQ: CRWV).

Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now. Learn More »

Fresh off a hot initial public offering (IPO) earlier this year, CoreWeave has emerged as an integral player in the AI infrastructure market. Let's dive into CoreWeave's business and explore how the company is transforming the AI landscape.

What does CoreWeave do?

For the last few years, investors have learned about the important role that advanced chipsets known as graphics processing units (GPUs) play in the development of generative AI. The GPU market is largely dominated by Nvidia and Advanced Micro Devices, both of which are able to command hefty price tags for their coveted data center hardware.

While AI has served as an unprecedented tailwind for the chip market, one of the subtle nuances is that this demand has brought a series of complications to supply and demand dynamics.

This is where CoreWeave comes into play. CoreWeave operates as a "neocloud," which is a specialized type of business that allows companies to access GPU architecture through cloud-based infrastructure. This flexible model appeals to businesses that may not be able to purchase GPUs directly from Nvidia or its cohorts due to rising price dynamics.

By offering an agile and potentially more affordable model than cloud hyperscalers such as Microsoft Azure, Amazon Web Services, and Google Cloud Platform, CoreWeave has been able to attract a number of high-profile customers and ink a series of multiyear, billion-dollar deals.

What does CoreWeave's growth look like?

For the quarter ended March 31, CoreWeave generated $982 million in revenue -- up 420% year over year. While the company's net loss widened more than twofold compared to the year-ago quarter, CoreWeave has some catalysts that should quickly turn around the dynamics of its profitability profile. See estimates in the chart below.

CRWV Revenue Estimates for Current Fiscal Year data by YCharts

During the earnings call, management raised guidance for both revenue and capital expenditures (capex). While more spending may stifle profitability in the short term, these investments are necessary foundations for the longer-term opportunity in AI infrastructure.

As Wall Street's estimates pictured in the chart above showcase, CoreWeave's investments today should help secure more access to Nvidia's Blackwell GPU architecture and should ultimately serve as a tailwind for more accelerated growth down the road.

Is CoreWeave stock a buy right now?

In the chart below, I compare CoreWeave to Oracle on a price-to-sales (P/S) basis. Oracle is also a leading player in infrastructure-as-a-service (IaaS), having just signed a $30 billion cloud deal of its own, so it's comparable to CoreWeave. That single deal is expected to bring in nearly twice the amount of CoreWeave's total 2027 revenue. And yet, investors are placing a twofold premium on CoreWeave's P/S multiple when compared to Oracle.

CRWV PS Ratio data by YCharts

I think there are a couple of nuances to point out when it comes to CoreWeave's valuation relative to a peer such as Oracle.

First, Oracle is experiencing a transition period -- effectively replacing slow-growth (or no-growth) segments of the business with its new, budding data center infrastructure operation. For this reason, investors are likely applying a discount to Oracle relative to a high-growth AI stock such as CoreWeave.

Moreover, CoreWeave completed an IPO earlier this year. Since then, the company has inked an $11.2 billion deal with OpenAI, announced the planned acquisition of Core Scientific to bolster its platform, and earned a spot in some of Wall Street's most respected institutional portfolios.

This confluence of factors is more than enough to garner outsize excitement and enthusiasm from investors. For these reasons, I'm not surprised to see CoreWeave trading at such a premium.

I think the most prudent course of action for investors is to buy CoreWeave stock at different price points over a long-term time horizon. If you invest the same amount of money at set time intervals, that is known as dollar-cost averaging, and can help mitigate risk by removing specific timing and price points from the equation.

Overall, I see CoreWeave as a compelling opportunity that is well positioned to dominate the infrastructure chapter of the AI narrative. If I could buy only one Nvidia-backed data center stock, CoreWeave would be it.

Should you invest $1,000 in CoreWeave right now?

Before you buy stock in CoreWeave, consider this:

The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and CoreWeave wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.

Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $636,628!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,063,471!*

Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 1,041% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 183% for the S&P 500. Don’t miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor.

See the 10 stocks »

*Stock Advisor returns as of July 21, 2025

Adam Spatacco has positions in Amazon, Microsoft, and Nvidia. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Advanced Micro Devices, Amazon, Microsoft, and Nvidia. The Motley Fool recommends Nebius Group and recommends the following options: long January 2026 $395 calls on Microsoft and short January 2026 $405 calls on Microsoft. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Key Points

• Energy Transfer pays a lucrative distribution supported by stable cash flow and a strong financial profile.

• The MLP has lots of growth coming down the pipeline.

• It currently trades at one of the lowest valuations in its peer group.

• 10 stocks we like better than Energy Transfer ›

Energy Transfer (NYSE: ET) offers investors a high-yielding distribution (currently around 7.5%) backed by a rock-solid financial profile. The master limited partnership (MLP) is also growing at a healthy rate, which should continue. To top it off, the company trades at a very attractive valuation.

Let's examine these features to determine whether they make Energy Transfer the smartest investment you can make today.

Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now. Learn More »

A rock-solid income stream

Energy Transfer's diversified midstream business generates substantial and stable cash flow, with fee-based contracts backing about 90% of the MLP's annual earnings. During the first quarter, the company produced $2.3 billion of distributable cash flow. It distributed a little over $1.1 billion of this money to investors, retaining the rest to invest in expansion projects and maintain its strong financial profile.

This conservative payout ratio allowed the MLP to maintain its leverage ratio in the lower half of its target range of 4 to 4.5 times. That has the company in its strongest financial position in its history.

This strong financial profile makes the MLP's payout highly durable.

A fully fueled growth engine

Energy Transfer also has a healthy growth profile. The MLP is on track to grow its earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) by around 5% this year. Growth drivers include last year's acquisition of WTG Midstream, recently completed organic expansion projects, and healthy market conditions.

The MLP has even more growth ahead. It's investing $5 billion into growth capital projects this year, including several gas processing plants, a major new natural gas pipeline, and some additional export capacity. These growth projects should come online in the second half of 2025 through the end of next year. Given that timeline, Energy Transfer expects these projects will boost its earnings growth rate in the 2026 to 2027 time frame. That provides the MLP with lots of near-term visibility into its earnings growth.

Additionally, Energy Transfer is developing several expansion projects, including its Lake Charles LNG facility and a new gas supply line for an AI data center. The MLP has identified three major catalysts -- rising Permian production, increasing gas demand from emerging sectors such as AI data centers, and growing export demand for natural gas liquids -- that will provide it with numerous opportunities to continue expanding its midstream footprint in the years to come. Its ability to secure more new projects would further enhance and extend its earnings growth outlook.

Energy Transfer's strong financial position also enables it to continue making accretive acquisitions that complement its operations and growth. The MLP has a long history as a consolidator in the midstream sector, often making at least one major deal each year. Visible earnings growth from its upcoming projects and future expansion opportunities supports the company's plan to deliver 3% to 5% annual distribution increases.

All this for an attractive value

Despite its strong growth and financial profiles, the MLP currently trades for an enterprise value (EV)-to-EBITDA ratio of less than 9. That's the second-lowest valuation among energy midstream companies, where the peer group average is around 12.

This low valuation is a key reason for Energy Transfer's high distribution yield, which enhances its appeal compared to peers.

A wise choice

Energy Transfer offers a high-yielding distribution and has a strong growth profile. It's also in the best financial shape of its history and has a valuation near the bottom of its peer group. These features make the MLP look like a very attractive investment these days, as it could deliver strong total returns. It's especially smart for those seeking a lucrative and growing passive income stream with potential tax benefits from the Schedule K-1 Federal Tax Form that the MLP sends investors each year.

Should you invest $1,000 in Energy Transfer right now?

Before you buy stock in Energy Transfer, consider this:

The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Energy Transfer wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.

Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $636,628!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,063,471!*

Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 1,041% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 183% for the S&P 500. Don’t miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor.

See the 10 stocks »

*Stock Advisor returns as of July 21, 2025

Matt DiLallo has positions in Energy Transfer. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Key Points

• Artificial intelligence-powered drug development isn't a mere premise anymore. Recursion Pharmaceuticals has made it a reality.

• The next era of e-commerce favors platforms like Shopify's, which allows brands to connect with consumers outside of massive digital shopping malls.

• U.S. drivers may not be big fans of electric vehicles, but that's not the case everywhere else.

• 10 stocks we like better than Shopify ›

Are Americans saving enough money to fund a comfortable retirement? Probably not. As the Motley Fool's own research indicates, as of 2022 the median retirement savings for U.S. households is a mere $87,000. That means half of the country has saved up more, while the other half has saved less. Even being in the upper half of the crowd, however, isn't necessarily enough.

Committing more of your income to the effort is still only half the battle though. You'll also need to get more out of your money while you're growing your nest egg. This means achieving bigger gains without taking on significantly more risk.

Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now. Continue »

Here's a closer look at three growth stocks you could buy and hold for decades as a means of supercharging your portfolio's growth. While each of these tickers brings some added risk and volatility to the table that will require regular monitoring, their long-term upside potential is arguably worth the work.

Recursion Pharmaceuticals

While artificial intelligence (AI) still has of room for improvement, the writing is on the wall -- the technology will be tackling complex problems that individuals and institutions just can't. This includes designing and testing pharmaceuticals.

Well, the future is here. Recursion Pharmaceuticals (NASDAQ: RXRX) has built an AI-powered platform capable of virtually testing a drug rather than requiring a full-blown clinical trial of an idea. Leveraging 36 petabytes (36 million gigabytes) of digital biological and chemical data, its so-called Recursion OS can accomplish what would normally take years and millions of dollars in a matter of days at a fraction of the cost.

And it's no mere theory. The technology is not only functioning -- it's commercialized. A handful of pharma companies including Roche and Sanofi are using Recursion OS to tackle some of their own developmental work, while Recursion is working on some drugs of its own. All of these drug candidates will still need to go through the actual clinical trial process to satisfy regulatory agencies like the FDA. Recursion's software facilitates focus though, by virtue of weeding out less promising drug prospects so more resources can be devoted to more promising ones. That's huge.

It's still relatively early for Recursion, and for that matter, the AI-assisted drug-development industry itself. Recursion Pharmaceuticals remains in the red, and will likely remain there for at least a few more years. This arguably makes Recursion the riskiest of the three stocks being put under the microscope here.

Just understand the potential reward is commensurate with the risk. Recursion Pharmaceuticals is nearing a revenue and profit turning point in front of what Straits Research believes will be average annualized growth of nearly 32% for the artificial intelligence drug-development industry through 2030. This tailwind alone should be enough to push Recursion to profitability. That makes this stock's prolonged and persistent weakness since peaking in 2021 is a fantastic buying opportunity.

Shopify

Amazon (NASDAQ: AMZN) is in no immediate danger of being dethroned as the king of North America's e-commerce scene. But it's no longer able to simply bully the rest of the industry. Competitors are successfully pushing back... just not in the way you might have expected. Rather than one or two rival names making inroads, brands and merchants are taking matters into their own hands by setting up their own online stores as a means of working all the way around Amazon's domination.

And they've largely got Shopify (NASDAQ: SHOP) to thank for the option.

In simplest terms, Shopify helps companies establish their own in-house e-commerce presence. From websites to payment-processing to inventory-management to marketing, Shopify can do it all, making it easy for businesses of all sizes to stay focused on more important matters (like running that business). Although the company no longer discloses how many clients are using its technology, it does divulge the scope of its business. Last year, Shopify's solutions facilitated the sale of $292.3 billion worth of goods and services, up 24% year over year to extend a long-established growth streak. Shopify collected $8.9 billion worth of revenue for itself in the process, turning a little over $1 billion of it into net income.

SHOP Revenue (Quarterly) data by YCharts

This growth still only scratches the surface of the opportunity though. Market research outfit eMarketer reports that only a little more than one-fifth of the world's retail spending is currently done online. The rest is still taking place in brick-and-mortar stores.

While certainly some of these sales will never move online, much of it can. Brand-owned and merchant-managed online stores are positioned to capture more than their fair share of whatever growth awaits the e-commerce industry, however, as these players increasingly see the value in establishing their own direct relationships with customers. In this vein, analysts expect Shopify to produce top-line growth in the ballpark of 20% in each of the three years ahead.

Nio

Finally, add Nio (NYSE: NIO) to your list of stocks to buy and hold for decades if you want a shot at building a bigger retirement nest egg.

It wouldn't be surprising if you'd never heard of it. Although it's finding a bit of traction in Europe, the Chinese maker of electric vehicles predominantly serves China itself. It delivered 72,056 electrified cars during the second quarter of this year, up nearly 26% from the year-ago comparison, underscoring production growth that's been in place for some time now.

Think the electric vehicle (EV) market is hitting a wall due to disinterest? Not so fast. That's largely an American phenomenon. Data gathered by CleanTechnica indicates sales of electric vehicles in China soared 25% to 1.1 million units last month, accounting for more than half of the country's entire automobile sales.

That's still just the beginning though. The International Energy Agency expected EVs to account for 80% of China's total car sales by 2030, thanks to supportive policies that encourage the alternative to combustion-powered vehicles. It's making inroads in Europe as well, for the same reason. And, while there's little incentive for the company to make a push into the United States' anemic EV market right now, if and when domestic interest perks up, Nio has maintained tentative plans for that possibility.

It could be a while before Nio works its way out of the red and into the black -- it simply needs more scale. This could make the stock a little less than completely comfortable to own in the interim.

It's making clear progress on the production as well as the profitability front though, and will almost certainly get there sooner or later, and likely sooner. Given how inevitable this outcome now seems, the market's apt to reward the progress en route to fiscal viability.

Should you invest $1,000 in Shopify right now?

Before you buy stock in Shopify, consider this:

The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Shopify wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.

Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $636,628!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,063,471!*

Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 1,041% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 183% for the S&P 500. Don’t miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor.

See the 10 stocks »

*Stock Advisor returns as of July 21, 2025

James Brumley has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Amazon and Shopify. The Motley Fool recommends Roche Holding AG. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Key Points

• AGNC saw another tough quarter and MBS spreads rose.

• However, the mortgage REIT is expecting better times ahead when banks return to the MBS market.

• In the current environment, the mREIT looks like it can earn enough to maintain its current dividend, but it's getting tighter.

• 10 stocks we like better than AGNC Investment Corp. ›

The ongoing tariff situation, along with tensions between President Donald Trump and Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, continued to make for a difficult mortgage-backed security (MBS) market in the second quarter. While mortgage real estate investment trust (mREIT) AGNC Investment (NASDAQ: AGNC) was able to navigate the market, the environment weighed on its results.

With the stock yielding more than 15%, let's see if better days could be ahead and whether the stock can maintain its dividend.

Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now. Learn More »

Rates remain in focus

AGNC is an mREIT that primarily holds a portfolio of MBSes that are backed by government-sponsored agencies, such as Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. MBSes are residential mortgages that are bundled into bond-like securities, and since they are backed by government-sponsored agencies, they are generally regarded as being largely free from the risk of default.

However, like other bonds, interest rates have an effect on MBS values, and their yields trade at a spread to U.S. Treasury yields, which are considered the ultimate safe haven. A few years ago, mREITs came under significant pressure due to the Fed raising rates and MBS spreads widening, as the Fed let MBSes that it had acquired as part of earlier quantitative easing roll off its balance sheet. This also led to the highly publicized blowup of Silicon Valley Bank, which was heavily invested in MBSes at the time. Since then, with regulatory tightening, banks have shied away from owning longer-duration assets like MBSes.

On its Q2 call, AGNC said that despite the Federal Reserve and Treasury Department indicating that beneficial regulatory reforms were coming, banks remained largely on the sidelines. It also noted that foreign investor demand appeared subdued due to a weak U.S. dollar and geopolitical risk. However, it noted that MBS spreads have tightened since quarter-end and that it expects banks and foreign investor demand to grow in the future. This dynamic could help the current wide MBS spread to narrow.

Importantly, AGNC said comments from President Trump and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent should help ease any investor concerns about the future of Fannie and Freddie and their role in the mortgage markets. Trump said that while he wants to take the GSEs (Fannie and Freddie) public, he will do so with the U.S. government keeping its implicit guarantee. In addition, Treasury Secretary Bessent said one requirement of privatization would be for MBS spreads to remain the same, and ideally, he wants them tightened. That should help take a major potential risk off the table for AGNC and other mREITs.

One of the most important metrics for mREITs is their tangible book value (TBV), which is essentially the value of their portfolio. The market turmoil caused AGNC's TBV to fall 5%, or $0.44 per share, to $7.81 at the end of Q2, down from $8.25 per share at the end of Q1. It said it has risen 1% for July after deducting its dividend.

Looking at other important metrics in the quarter, AGNC's average net interest spread was 2.01%, compared to 2.69% a year ago and 2.12% in the first quarter. The narrower spread stems from the lessening benefits of its hedges and higher hedge costs.

Overall, AGNC generated $0.38 per share in net spread and income from dollar rolls (a hedging strategy equivalent to short-selling but specifically employed in MBS markets to avoid losses when MBS values decline), which it uses to pay out its dividend. It generated a negative 1% economic return on its tangible common equity, with its TBV falling $0.44 per share while it paid out $0.36 per share in dividends during the quarter.

AGNC ended the quarter with higher debt, with 7.6 times tangible net book value "at risk" leverage (debt + net receivables or payables for unsettled investment securities outstanding/shareholder equity excluding goodwill). That compares to 7.5 at the end of the first quarter and 7.4 a year ago.

The company said it was in a position to deploy capital at a measured pace, but that it has room to increase leverage slightly. During the quarter, it raised $800 million in equity through its ATM (at-the-market) program at a significant premium to its TBV. It had invested less than half the proceeds at quarter-end and will continue to put the money to work. While equity raises are dilutive for companies, when mortgage REITs raise equity above TBV, it actually increases the TBV, so it is a positive.

Is AGNC stock a buy?

AGNC is still generating enough income to cover its large dividend, and it expects its net spread and dollar roll income to stay in the mid- to high-$0.30 to the low- to mid-$0.40 range, which should help support it. However, for the stock to really work, it needs to see its TBV rally. The Fed seems reluctant to lower interest rates at the moment, although the biggest TBV catalyst for the mREIT would be tighter MBS spreads.

Wide spreads can be beneficial to AGNC when it's putting money to work and investing in MBSes, as it can get higher returns. However, it needs the spreads to eventually narrow for the stock to benefit. AGNC said that a high percentage of its mortgage-backed securities is in specified pools with favorable prepayment attributes, so it is not likely to see a lot of refinancing with lower rates. As such, lower rates and spreads would be a big benefit for the stock.

With MBS spreads near historical highs, I think risk-tolerant, income-oriented investors can buy the stock at current levels, as I think further TBV downside appears limited. However, the current stock price does appear to somewhat reflect this.

Should you invest $1,000 in AGNC Investment Corp. right now?

Before you buy stock in AGNC Investment Corp., consider this:

The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and AGNC Investment Corp. wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.

Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $636,628!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,063,471!*

Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 1,041% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 183% for the S&P 500. Don’t miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor.

See the 10 stocks »

*Stock Advisor returns as of July 21, 2025

Geoffrey Seiler has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Key Points

• Nucor is an out-of-favor steelmaking giant.

• High-yield Federal Realty is the only REIT that is a Dividend King.

• Enterprise Products Partners is a high-yield midstream bellwether with a great distribution record.

• 10 stocks we like better than Enterprise Products Partners ›

If you are looking to invest some money today and have a holding period that is 10 years or more, you're going to want to pick from an elite group of companies. You want industry-leading monsters that have something unique about them that will keep them ahead of the pack. Nucor (NYSE: NUE), Federal Realty Investment Trust (NYSE: FRT), and Enterprise Products Partners (NYSE: EPD) all fit the bill. Here's why.

1. Nucor is a giant U.S. steelmaker

Steel is a cyclical industry that is a bit out of favor today. That's left U.S. steelmaking giant Nucor's stock down about 30% from its 2023 highs. Don't let that deep downturn worry you, it is actually pretty normal for a steel company. In fact, the best time to buy a cyclical business can often be when Wall Street has placed it in the dog house.

Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now. Learn More »

What sets Nucor apart from its peers is its status as a Dividend King. Despite the inherent swings in the industry, this company has managed to continue to increase its dividend through thick and thin. Helping that along is a boring and reliable playbook focusing on continually investing in the business. That has notably included both the production of bulk steel and the expansion of the portfolio into higher-margin steel products.

Some investors will buy Nucor to play the steel cycle. But this is the type of company that you might want to buy and sock away for 10 years or more. Although the dividend yield is a bit miserly at 1.7%, this stock is really about getting exposure to a reliable and growing steel business.

2. Federal Realty is the only one of its kind

Sticking with the Dividend King theme, real estate investment trust (REIT) Federal Realty has also increased its dividend annually for more than five decades. It is the only REIT to have achieved that feat, making it an industry standout even though it is actually a fairly small business.

Don't let the company's modest portfolio of about 100 properties fool you. It happens to own some of the most desirable strip malls and mixed-use developments in the markets where it operates. It is the focus on quality over quantity that has resulted in Federal Realty's strong track record.

That said, the REIT is a very active portfolio manager. So it is always buying and selling assets, redeveloping new acquisitions to increase the value so they can be sold down the road at a premium price. Federal Realty won't excite you, but you can be sure that the attractive 4.6% dividend yield is backed by an incredibly reliable business.

3. Enterprise Products Partners is an industry leader

Enterprise Products Partners is one of the largest midstream businesses in North America. Its portfolio of pipelines, storage, processing, and transportation assets is vital to the world's energy markets. And it largely charges fees for the use of its assets, which makes the cash flows it generates highly reliable regardless of the price of the commodities moving through its system.

This is the big-picture story that supports the master limited partnership's (MLP's) huge 6.9% yield. The slow and steady growth the business has achieved over time, meanwhile, is what has supported Enterprise's streak of 26 consecutive annual distribution hikes. That's not enough to make it a Dividend King, like Nucor and Federal Realty, but Enterprise hasn't been around for 50 years, either. It has been around for a little over a quarter of a century, having gone public in 1998. Which means the distribution has been increased on the regular from day one.

Three monster options from three different sectors

Nucor, Federal Realty, and Enterprise are vastly different businesses, but each one is a monster in its own way. And each one has an incredible dividend track record. If you are looking for stocks to buy and hold, this trio would be a good place to start today.

Should you invest $1,000 in Enterprise Products Partners right now?

Before you buy stock in Enterprise Products Partners, consider this:

The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Enterprise Products Partners wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.

Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $636,628!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,063,471!*

Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 1,041% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 183% for the S&P 500. Don’t miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor.

See the 10 stocks »

*Stock Advisor returns as of July 21, 2025

Reuben Gregg Brewer has positions in Federal Realty Investment Trust and Nucor. The Motley Fool recommends Enterprise Products Partners. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Key Points

• Claiming early reduces your own retirement benefit, but it will not affect your partner's spousal benefit.

• If your partner claims early, that can reduce their spousal benefit by up to 35%.

• Claiming early can reduce the survivor benefit your partner is entitled to after you die.

• The $23,760 Social Security bonus most retirees completely overlook ›

You're nearing 62 and you're chomping at the bit to sign up for Social Security. You're ready to get back some of the money you've put into the program, and you want as many checks as possible. There's just one thing holding you back.

You're married, and you don't want your decision to hurt the spousal benefit your partner qualifies for. It's a natural thing to worry about, since claiming early can reduce the size of your own retirement benefit by up to 30%. You're right in thinking that your choices affect your spouse's benefits, but they may not do so in the way you expect.

Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now. Continue »

How spousal Social Security benefits work

To qualify for a spousal benefit, you must be married to a qualifying worker -- that is, one who has worked long enough to earn 40 credits. One credit is defined as $1,810 in earnings in 2025, and you can earn up to four credits per year. There's generally a one-year length of marriage rule, though that's waived if you were already eligible for Social Security in the month before the month you got married, or if you're the parent of your spouse's child.

A spousal benefit is worth up to one-half of the retirement benefit the worker qualifies for at their full retirement age (FRA). Your FRA depends on your birth year, but it's 67 for most adults today. As mentioned above, if you claim retirement benefits early, you could shrink your checks up to 30%. But your claiming age has no bearing on the size of your partner's spousal benefit.

Your spouse's claiming age does matter, though. To qualify for the maximum spousal benefit, they must wait until they reach their own FRA to apply. Claiming early reduces their checks by 25/36 of 1% per month for up to 36 months, and then by 5/12 of 1% per month thereafter. That can drop their checks by 35%.

If a retired worker qualifies for a $2,000 monthly benefit at their FRA, that means their partner's maximum spousal benefit is $1,000 at their own FRA. If the spouse claims immediately at 62, they would only get $650 per check if their FRA is 67. This reduction is permanent.

It's worth pointing out that your partner may not get a spousal benefit even if they qualify for one. When their own retirement benefit is larger than their spousal benefit, the government pays them the retirement benefit instead. You cannot claim both benefits at once.

How your Social Security decisions affect your spouse

While your choice to claim Social Security early may not directly harm your partner's spousal benefit, it will affect them in a few ways. First, it allows them to apply for spousal benefits earlier. They must wait until you apply for Social Security before they can claim a spousal benefit.

Second, claiming early reduces the survivor benefit your partner qualifies for after you pass away. For this reason, some people choose to delay Social Security, or avoid claiming altogether if they're in poor health and believe their spouse will be heavily dependent upon Social Security to make ends meet.

But ultimately, when you sign up for Social Security is a personal decision, one that's best talked through with your spouse. When you work together, you can coordinate your claiming strategy to take home the largest household benefits.

Sometimes, this involves the lower-earning spouse claiming their own retirement benefit, assuming they qualify for one, early. This helps the higher-earning spouse to delay benefits until their FRA or even later. You continue to grow your checks for every month you delay benefits until you turn 70. Then, when the higher earner applies for benefits, the lower earner can switch to a spousal benefit if it's worth more than what they're currently receiving.

You can estimate your own retirement benefit and your spousal benefit through your my Social Security account. You can set one of these up for free in a few minutes. Have your spouse do this as well. There's a tool in your account that can help you figure out what kind of spousal and retirement benefit you'll qualify for at every possible claiming age.

Use this information to start a conversation with your partner about when each of you wants to apply for Social Security. But stay open to changing your plan, if necessary, as you get closer to signing up.

The $23,760 Social Security bonus most retirees completely overlook

If you're like most Americans, you're a few years (or more) behind on your retirement savings. But a handful of little-known "Social Security secrets" could help ensure a boost in your retirement income.

One easy trick could pay you as much as $23,760 more... each year! Once you learn how to maximize your Social Security benefits, we think you could retire confidently with the peace of mind we're all after. Join Stock Advisor to learn more about these strategies.

View the "Social Security secrets" »

The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.