Normal view

Received before yesterday

These Were the 2 Worst-Performing Stocks in the S&P 500 in June 2025

Key Points

The S&P 500 (SNPINDEX: ^GSPC) index rose 5% in June, but there were plenty of laggards among the index's 500 stocks. The two worst-performing stocks in the S&P 500 fell by double-digit percentages. Notably, both were consumer stocks.

A yellow tariffs signboard with the American flag and Capitol building in the background.

Image source: Getty Images.

Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now. Learn More »

Lululemon Athletica

Lululemon Athletica (NASDAQ: LULU) stock plummeted over 20% on a single trading day in June, marking one of its biggest intraday falls in history, after reporting poor numbers. It ended the month down 25%.

Lululemon's same-store sales grew by only 1% year over year, while its operating margin fell by 110 basis points to 18.5% in the first quarter. With tariff-driven costs eating into its profits, Lululemon slashed its earnings outlook for the full year by almost 25% to $14.68 per share at the midpoint.

However, Lululemon reaffirmed its sales growth guidance of 7% to 8% and is raising prices and diversifying sourcing channels to mitigate the impact of tariffs. Lululemon doesn't manufacture but outsources production to countries like Vietnam, Cambodia, and Sri Lanka. Lululemon, however, still gets almost 75% revenue from the Americas.

After June's fall, Lululemon stock is trading at a price-to-earnings (P/E) of 16, less than half its five-year average P/E.

J.M. Smucker

J.M. Smucker (NYSE: SJM) stock tanked 12.8% to a 52-week low of $93.30 per share in June after reporting 3% and 13% declines in sales and adjusted earnings per share (EPS), respectively, for its fourth quarter of fiscal 2025. Low demand for dog snacks and sweet baked goods, the recent divestment of pet food brands, and rising costs were largely to blame.

Smucker expects total sales to grow by only 2% to 4% in fiscal 2026, versus 7% last year, and adjusted EPS to fall by 11%.

Smucker's Uncrustables brand, however, reported double-digit sales growth in Q4 and is close to hitting a billion dollars in sales. Meanwhile, Smucker continues to generate solid cash flows and is taking "decisive actions" to revive its sweet baked segment, which has struggled since acquiring Twinkies maker Hostess Brands in 2023.

Should you invest $1,000 in Lululemon Athletica Inc. right now?

Before you buy stock in Lululemon Athletica Inc., consider this:

The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Lululemon Athletica Inc. wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.

Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $671,477!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,010,880!*

Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 1,047% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 180% for the S&P 500. Don’t miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor.

See the 10 stocks »

*Stock Advisor returns as of July 7, 2025

Neha Chamaria has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends J.M. Smucker and Lululemon Athletica Inc. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

What's Going on With Lululemon Stock?

Lululemon (NASDAQ: LULU) stock is already down 37% in 2025, and investors are curious whether this is a buying opportunity.

*Stock prices used were the afternoon prices of July 10, 2025. The video was published on July 12, 2025.

Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now. Continue »

Should you invest $1,000 in Lululemon Athletica Inc. right now?

Before you buy stock in Lululemon Athletica Inc., consider this:

The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Lululemon Athletica Inc. wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.

Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $671,477!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,010,880!*

Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 1,047% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 180% for the S&P 500. Don’t miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor.

See the 10 stocks »

*Stock Advisor returns as of July 7, 2025

Parkev Tatevosian, CFA has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Lululemon Athletica Inc. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Parkev Tatevosian is an affiliate of The Motley Fool and may be compensated for promoting its services. If you choose to subscribe through his link, he will earn some extra money that supports his channel. His opinions remain his own and are unaffected by The Motley Fool.

I'm Upgrading Lululemon Stock to a Buy

Lululemon's (NASDAQ: LULU) valuation has declined enough to offset the macroeconomic and geopolitical headwinds it faces in the near term.

*Stock prices used were the afternoon prices of July 9, 2025. The video was published on July 11, 2025.

Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now. Continue »

Should you invest $1,000 in Lululemon Athletica Inc. right now?

Before you buy stock in Lululemon Athletica Inc., consider this:

The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Lululemon Athletica Inc. wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.

Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $671,477!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,010,880!*

Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 1,047% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 180% for the S&P 500. Don’t miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor.

See the 10 stocks »

*Stock Advisor returns as of July 7, 2025

Parkev Tatevosian, CFA has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Lululemon Athletica Inc. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Parkev Tatevosian is an affiliate of The Motley Fool and may be compensated for promoting its services. If you choose to subscribe through his link, he will earn some extra money that supports his channel. His opinions remain his own and are unaffected by The Motley Fool.

Trump-Musk Drama Costs Tesla

In this podcast, Motley Fool analysts David Meier and Jason Moser join host Ricky Mulvey to discuss:

  • Earnings from CrowdStrike, Lululemon, and Broadcom.
  • Elon Musk's feud with President Donald Trump and the impact on Tesla shareholders.
  • Docusign's turnaround story.
  • Two stocks worth watching: Asana and Amazon.

Stacey Vanek Smith, co-host of Everybody's Business, joins Ricky for a look at the tough job market facing college grads.

Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now. Learn More »

To catch full episodes of all The Motley Fool's free podcasts, check out our podcast center. When you're ready to invest, check out this top 10 list of stocks to buy.

A full transcript is below.

Don’t miss this second chance at a potentially lucrative opportunity

Ever feel like you missed the boat in buying the most successful stocks? Then you’ll want to hear this.

On rare occasions, our expert team of analysts issues a “Double Down” stock recommendation for companies that they think are about to pop. If you’re worried you’ve already missed your chance to invest, now is the best time to buy before it’s too late. And the numbers speak for themselves:

  • Nvidia: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2009, you’d have $377,293!*
  • Apple: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2008, you’d have $37,319!*
  • Netflix: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2004, you’d have $659,171!*

Right now, we’re issuing “Double Down” alerts for three incredible companies, available when you join Stock Advisor, and there may not be another chance like this anytime soon.

See the 3 stocks »

*Stock Advisor returns as of June 9, 2025

This podcast was recorded on June 06, 2025.

Ricky Mulvey: It's the Motley Fool Money Radio Show. I'm Ricky Mulvey joining me on the Internet today, it's Motley Fool Senior Analysts, Jason Moser and David Meyer. Fools, great to have you both here.

David Meier: Ricky, it's awesome to be here.

Ricky Mulvey: We've got earnings from CrowdStrike in Lululemon, but I mean, come on, how are we not going to talk about the breakup between Elon Musk and President Trump? First up, though, we're keeping our eye on the ball. We're starting with some economic data before we get to the juicy stuff. J Mo, the unemployment rate stands at 4.2%. While jobs were added above estimates, this report also says that the US added almost 100,000 fewer jobs than estimates thought in the prior two months. Something almost embarrassing, as embarrassing as a vocal crack. I'm seeing headlines that the labor market is softening. I'm seeing headlines that this report is strong. What say you?

Jason Moser: Yeah, this is an economy. There's this duality. The reality of the situation is that things are OK. We've been worried that we're standing on a cliff here as of late, but employment, yes, it slowed down a little bit. Wage growth was there, albeit slower as well. All things put together, things are OK, and we're not close to teetering into a recession it would appear. But then there's this anxiety from consumers, from businesses as we work our way through exactly what the impacts of all of this tariff stuff will ultimately look like and how that could impact business activity. Will it increase inflation? For now, though, things look pretty good. I think the question that I get from this because it seems like everything's OK, it's going to be interesting to see how the Fed reacts to this in the back half of the year. There's a lot of analysts out there that are positing that we probably could see the Fed be a little bit more aggressive with interest rate cuts in the back half of the year, particularly as inflation continues to abate, but it all still hinges on what in the world is going to happen with this tariff talk. That still just remains entirely unclear.

Ricky Mulvey: Traders are optimistic to your point of a recession on the prediction market coal sheet, the odds of a recession this year are at 27%, something that remains surprising to me, since we are coming off a quarter of economic contraction. According to the book, two of those gives you a recession, and we also have fewer ships coming in to the port of Los Angeles. This is a very confusing economic time for any observer. We're going to dive into some jobs trends, tariffs, the economy with Bloomberg's Stacey Vanek Smith later in the show. I'll wrap up the economic talk there and stick with earnings. We're going to focus on the business. Starting with our earnings chatter, we've got CrowdStrike. David, the cybersecurity giant and Fool favorite reported earlier this week. Here's some of the numbers. Total revenue grew to more than one billion dollars. That was a 20% increase from the prior year. 97% gross retention for its services. That's pretty good for a company still coming off in outage. However, investors did not like the guidance going forward. What set out to you in the results?

David Meier: Two things. Almost $200 million of recurring revenue added during the quarter, bringing the total to more than 4.4 billion, and a free cash flow margin of 25%. When I put those two numbers together, that shows me that there's plenty of demand for its products and services, and that the company is generating value from that growth. That is a good report.

Ricky Mulvey: From CEO George Kurtz, he said, "What excites me the most is the necessity agentic AI is creating for CrowdStrike holding Inc's AI native security." If you're going to understand the business and the growth path moving forward, you need to understand the AI agents that this cybersecurity giant is implementing. We'll start here. Why is Kurtz so excited about agentic AI?

David Meier: Yeah, it's actually on the other side that he's excited because AI agents by customers of CrowdStrike, they actually create threat vectors for bad actors. The more agents that are being created and they're being created very quickly right now, the market opportunity is only going up from there. I would also be excited about an increase in a market opportunity of a market where I am a leader.

Ricky Mulvey: I heard a quote on search engine, which is PJ Votes podcast, that basically cybersecurity is the only business that gets worse every single year in technology, because you have so many new threat actors coming in that these businesses are trying to keep up with. Then when you look at the balance sheet here or the financials, CrowdStrike has authorized one billion dollars for share buybacks. This is also a company that likes to issue a lot of stock, and it makes sense. That's how you attract software talent, but how excited should the investors be us on the retail side about this one billion dollars in potential share buybacks?

David Meier: The first thing is, I actually agree with your previous statement. That's the paradox of cybersecurity. It's always needed and always growing because bad actors are always out there. But getting to your question about repurchases at today's prices, I am not excited about that buyback at all. There has to be better ways of investing that money than buying back very expensive shares. I get it, it's about trying to control dilution, but there has to be plenty of things for CrowdStrike to be investing in going forward.

Jason Moser: I'm just going to say, I bet you they really wish they executed this a year ago. It more than doubled since that outage. Like you, Dave, I'm definitely not excited by this, and I bet dollars to doughnuts that there is no way this even remotely brings that share account down. Now, that's not unique. We see that all of the time in this space. Still, it's worth remembering.

Ricky Mulvey: For those listening, you have a few options when you have that extra cash, you can keep that cash on the balance sheet or what's wrong with a special dividend? You can pay a special dividend to your shareholders from time to time if you think your share price is a little high. Other companies do that. J Mo, let's move to Lululemon. Lululemon, the maker of stretchy pants and other fashions, is down about 18% this morning. Man, how bad are tariffs for this business, Jason?

Jason Moser: Stretchy pants. Listen, it is exposed to this tariff environment like most others in its space. Now, I'm not sure that they necessarily have the same exposure. If you look at their 10K, for example, and they quantify their supply chain exposure there, 35% of fabrics originated from Taiwan, 28% from China mainland, and 11% from South Korea. Now, on the flip side of that, the raw materials that they use, things like content labels, elastics, buttons, clasps, draw cords. All of that really essentially originates from Asia Pacific and mostly the China mainland. They do have that exposure there, but they are also working on trying to mitigate that. It'll just remain to be seen how well they could pull that off. But it's worth noting, their inventories at the end of the first quarter were up on a dollar basis, 23%, $1.7 billion versus $1.3 billion a year ago, so definitely something to keep an eye on.

Ricky Mulvey: Well, something that has investors in Lululemon, like me, shaking in our ABC pants is that a lot of this growth is coming internationally. If you're buying shares of Lululemon, you have to recognize that a lot of that sales growth is coming from the mainland of China where it's selling finished products. If you're hanging on to Lululemon stock, you're buying into that story. But right now, Lululemon has gotten absolutely crushed. It's at basically a grocery store earnings multiple, which, to me, says, no growth is ever coming again for this company. What's the market saying about this about Lululemon right now, and maybe what say you?

Jason Moser: You're right about the international growth. China revenue is up 22% versus the Americas up only 2%. CEO Calvin McDonald noted on the call. He said that their sense is that US consumers remain very cautious and are being very intentional about their buying decisions, and that just flows right into discretionary spending and impacts a company like Lululemon. In regard to the multiple, I think the multiple makes sense today. You're right, this thing has gotten crushed, and at around 18 times full-year earnings estimates, that's low, historically speaking. However, it also is because essentially it's pricing and no earnings growth. They essentially are not going to grow earnings this year. So then the question you have to ask yourself is, what does it look like beyond just the year? If you think the company can return back to modest top-line growth and really bringing it down to the bottom line for more robust earnings growth, then today would make a lot of sense as a potential buying opportunity. My sense is the multiple will ultimately be assigned is somewhere in the middle. Eighteen seems low for a company that I think can still grow, but I don't know that I'd be buying this company at 70 times earnings, either.

David Meier: One thing to always remember about Lululemon is that these buyers have discretionary income, and they love this product. So over the long term, that has served the company well.

Ricky Mulvey: After the break, it's the rumble between President Trump, Elon Musk, in the impact on Tesla. Stay right here. You're listening to Motley Fool Money.

Welcome back to Motley Fool Money. I'm Ricky Mulvey here with Motley Fool senior analysts, David Meier and Jason Moser. JMo and David, we talk about businesses a lot on this show, what we don't talk about often is friendship. What we've learned this week is that some friendships don't last forever, and that is the case with Elon Musk and President Donald Trump. If you want the receipts of their beef, you can check out X and Truth Social. But Musk is throwing barbs over the big, beautiful bill in the impacts on the national debt. Turns out, Elon Musk really does care about that and President Trump, of course, likes his bill. During this, I don't even know if you say a fool out fist fight, sparring match, whatever metaphor you want to use, they're not happy with each other. Tesla stock has taken a fall. More than $150 billion gone in market cap in just one trading day. Fools, I'm going to give this to Jason first. What is the most expensive breakup you've ever had?

Jason Moser: Boy, that escalated quickly, and I'm not going to get into my personal life on this show, Ricky. But I think this is given what we know about both people, this seemed inevitable. Who knows what tomorrow brings, but both very strong-willed and probably stubborn as a word that works here, too. The back and forth has been entertaining, I guess. Unless you're a Tesla shareholder. I'm not, but I'd imagine they probably don't really care for these barbs going back and forth. But I think it's important to note that the impact here on Tesla could be significant in regard to the bill. The bill essentially eliminates a credit worth as much as $7,500 for buyers of certain Tesla models and other EVs by the end of the year. According to JP Morgan analysis here. That would translate to roughly 1.2 billion dollar hit to Tesla's full year profit. That's not insignificant. Then you couple that with separate legislation that's been passed by the Senate based on California's EV sales mandates. That's another potential two billion dollar headwind to Tesla's sales according to JP Morgan. You're looking at some legislation here that could have a meaningful impact on the business if it passes in its current form. But then I saw the tweet there from Musk. He was like whatever, let the credit expire. Go ahead and go as is, but fix the rest of the bill. Who knows how this will all shake out, but it's been quite a couple of days.

Ricky Mulvey: I think, once you start accusing the president of being on certain lists and threatening to release those lists, I would guess that he is not going to take your calls anymore. David, I am not going to ask you about your personal life. I'll just assume that you've never had a $150 billion breakup. But Tesla is in a very weird spot right now. Because we have seen what happens when brands get political. Usually, it's brands going to the left. We've now seen it with brands going to the right. Tesla has managed to upset people on both sides. If you like Trump, you may not be happy with Elon Musk right now. If you're on the left, you may not like what he has done when he was in the White House during his one-month tour of DOGE.

Jason Moser: Do you think Tesla can break this trend of brands getting hurt for the long term when they get political?

David Meier: That's a very interesting question. I think the answer is yes, but only if Musk stops focusing [LAUGHTER] on the soap opera, and starts focusing on the things that will drive the future value of Tesla here. What do I mean? Let's get full self driving. Let's get that out. Let's get the cyber cabs out. Let's get progress with the optimist robots. All the things that are going to drive the future value of the company, put your attention there. Stop this nonsense. You work for the shareholders, and you're a huge shareholder. I realize that money may not matter to him, but it does matter to the people that have invested in his company, so he can break the cycle. Get focused on what is important for the future value of the company. Ultimately, I think, at some point he will do that.

Jason Moser: You know what? If I can give him advice if you're both listening. If you got an issue with someone, a phone call is always better. A coffee is always better. It's always tough once you start airing it out on social media. Let's get back to earnings. Let's get back to earnings because maybe the quietest trillion dollar company on the market reported this week, and that is Broadcom. David, revenue rose 20% on the year here. This is an AI fueled growth story that I think not a ton of people are talking about. But what did we learn about the chip business from Broadcom's report this week?

David Meier: We learned that the demand for AI chips remains high and is growing fast. Within its AI semiconductor revenue, that increased 46%, which easily outpaced the entire chip segment that it has a 17% growth. Quite frankly, that's good for Broadcom and anybody supporting that industry.

Jason Moser: Broadcom's chips, we talk about Invidia and the GPUs that allow these, like, AI LLMs to run. Broadcom's chips are more of a connective tissue. They're working in the background doing memory and networking for running these AI workloads. Their customers include the big tech companies we talk about more often on the show. For listeners that are less familiar with this space, why do these big tech companies need Broadcom chips?

David Meier: It's a great question that can be answered with a question. Do you want your AI to work? If so, you need to be able to spread the computing around the data center and stitch it back together to deliver the answers you're looking for. That's what Broadcom's Chips does. You know, that's pretty important. That's got to be done. If we want this to work, that Broadcom's chips make it happen.

Jason Moser: Then as we wrap up on the Broadcom topic, anything else in the report really stand out to you?

David Meier: No, that 46% growth in the AI semiconductor part of their business, that's phenomenal. I mean, it just really is. That steals the show.

Jason Moser: Let's wrap up with DocuSign. JMO, DocuSign's revenue. This may surprise you. It's actually up from a year ago, and many investors have been out on this COVID fallen angel. I've clicked on Docusigns. What's happening with the business?

David Meier: This is a bit of a good news, bad news quarter, and, we'll get into the good news here in a minute. But why is the stock down? It really is about the Billings and the subsequent guidance for the coming quarter. Now, it's worth noting that they actually raised guidance for the full year, but I think the outlook for the coming quarter maybe has the market wondering how that's exactly going to play out. Management misfecast the Billings number, and that came in a little bit later. It's worth noting. We've seen this before with this company. It is partly a billing story. Billings that's ultimately a timing issue, so it can be difficult to predict. I wonder if they shouldn't just eliminate from even guiding on Billings, to be honest with you. But I mean, talking about the good news, like you said, top line revenue up, we saw what, 8%? We saw $1 net retention rate of 101%. The positive trend there continues, total customers up 10%, surpassing 1.7 million in large customers. We talk about this metric a lot with Docusign large customers spending over $300,000 annually with the company grew 6% from the year ago quarter. I mean, I understand the billings concerns, but there was also a lot to like in the report.

Jason Moser: Then quickly, this company has been telling investors a turnaround story for a while now. You can lose a lot of money waiting on turnaround stories. We've got 20 seconds left. Yes, no, maybe are you buying the turnaround story at DocuSign.

David Meier: Cautiously optimistic. I think all of the metrics that matter point toward this company still growing, and that's ultimately encouraging.

Jason Moser: David Meyer and Jason Moser, gentlemen, we will see you a little bit later in the show, but up next, we're going to make sense of the economy. This strange economy with Bloomberg Stacey Vanek Smith stay right here. You're listening to Motley Fool Money.

Ricky Mulvey: You're listening to Motley Fool Money? I'm Ricky Mulvey. The economy is in an interesting spot. The labor market looks hot on the surface, but it's a different story for college grads. As tariffs came online, inflation actually cooled. Helping me make sense of this is Stacey Vanek Smith. You may have heard her on Marketplace or the indicator from Planet Money. She's the co host of a new show called Everybody's Business. VanikSmith joined me earlier this week to make sense of the job market and tariffs. Stacey Vanek Smith co hosts the podcast Everybody's Business from Bloomberg Business Week. Welcome to Motley Fool Money.

Stacey Vanek Smith: Thanks, Ricky. It's great to be here. It's great to see you.

Ricky Mulvey: What an interesting time to check in on the job market. What we're seeing is this very healthy picture at the surface. The U-6 rate, which includes marginally attached workers.

Stacey Vanek Smith: You're going deep. The U-6 Rates. Let's go all in, yes.

Ricky Mulvey: Because that's people who want to work a little bit more. It's the biggest, broadest understanding of the labor market. As we look at the April numbers, and we'll have new numbers by the time you're hearing this, but not when we're recording this. That was down April to April. You heard at the last press conference from Jerome Powell, the unemployment rate remains low, and the labor market is at or near maximum employment. Stacey, this sounds like a labor market that is firing all cylinders, but there seems to be a lot of issues and problems under the surface.

Stacey Vanek Smith: I completely agree. I think this is just one of the most interesting job markets I've ever seen. I don't think I would have ever even imagined a disconnect like this would be possible because everything from my training, and I've been looking at business and economic issues for a long time, you know, it usually the job market is something that you feel. There's a reason I think that people know about the unemployment number. It's probably the most easy to talk about of all economic indicators, I think. I feel like it's the one people pay attention to the most because it's the one you feel and affects our day to day lives. I tend to think of it as something that connects very easily with my lived reality. it just does not feel at all like the job markets in a good place. It feels like it's in a bad place, and all the signs would point to a bad job market. But you're so right. If you look at the numbers, this job markets super strong. Unemployment's near historic lows. We just got the Jolts report, maybe the best name of an economic report that I know, but it's like I think it's job openings, labor turnover, something. But that report came out, and it looks great. Like, job openings are up. Hiring went up more than expected. I don't know, Ricky. I don't know. I have some thoughts, but it's is such a disconnect.

Ricky Mulvey: The good news is you're on a podcast, so you're welcome to share those thoughts. The Jolts report is an interesting one. That's one that I've called before the take your job and stuff it index because it's people voluntarily quitting their job usually with the belief that you can go out and find another job if you're willing to do that. You've also done some reporting with college grads right now. You looked into how the job market is looking for entry level workers, which is at the most risk of getting cut out by AI, especially for white collar jobs. What have you heard from them?

Stacey Vanek Smith: I did I'm based in New York, and so Colombia had their graduation last week. I went up and talked to some of the graduates about how they were feeling. Everyone I talked to felt pretty bad about the job market, except for one woman who was in engineering, who said she felt like everyone she knew had a job. Everybody else I talked to, when I talked to, like, a dozen people, everybody felt terrible about it. The computer science graduates felt terrible about it. I talked to one young man and he had a job, but he said about 40% of his fellow graduates in computer science did not have jobs. The electrical engineering graduates I spoke to said the market was terrible. Everybody just said, Universities are cutting funding, research is going down. Our job for computer science getting replaced by AI, like you said, they were feeling terrible about the job market.

Ricky Mulvey: Can you make any sense of that disconnect then? You have this very healthy surface number. You have college grads feeling not great. In the last quarter, GDP went down. Economic growth slowed a little bit, and you would expect to see jobs really reacting to that and yet, it is a full employment picture in the economy, according to our Fed Chief.

Stacey Vanek Smith: Well, I think there are few things going on. I mean, the short answer is, I don't know. I just don't know. I'm so puzzled. A couple of things to keep in mind is that sometimes jobs are a little bit of a lagging indicator because companies will often wait a little bit to lay people off if times get tough. Especially because we had that really hot job market during the pandemic and so it was a lot. It was hard for businesses to find workers in a lot of cases so they might be more hesitant than they would have been before to let people go, just knowing that it can be hard to find good people. There's a lot of uncertainty right now. I think maybe companies are waiting and seeing a little bit, so maybe they are just holding their cards close to their vest and waiting to make moves. But, I mean, another part of it is maybe the sectors that are hiring versus the sectors that are experiencing layoffs. I looked into the Joel report a little bit, and sectors like healthcare and social assistance. Those are hiring. A lot of the jobs are that and business services. The ones laying people off are like manufacturing and leisure and hospitality. Specially leisure and hospitality, I think is pretty visible. It could just be the sectors that are hiring might be less visible than the other ones. Also, as humans, we tend to be oriented more toward the bad news a little bit. I do think there tends to be a little bit of a negativity bias sometimes. We went through such a trauma with COVID. So maybe that's part of it. I have trouble believing that, but I don't know. I'm looking at the numbers. I can't I don't know. It doesn't make any sense to me. What about you?

Ricky Mulvey: I mean, some of its vibe from looking at LinkedIn, I see a lot of, like, job searching posts on LinkedIn. But then I realize, there's a tremendous amount of bias in that sample. One of which is because LinkedIn has this feature of the open to work sticker.

Stacey Vanek Smith: Yes. That's a good point.

Ricky Mulvey: It used to be not as visible if someone was looking for a job or just posting on LinkedIn. Then there's also a selection bias there where if one is posting regularly on LinkedIn, they are more likely to be looking for a job, and then I think there was a lot of gains. I haven't looked at the JOLTS report, but I would guess, with the slowdown in white collar work, the only way that that makes sense is if there is some makeup in what you said as healthcare work and then service and hospitality, even if it's not travel and leisure. That part would be my guess.

Stacey Vanek Smith: We're also journalists, and media is a hot mess right now. We might have a skewed view because the people we know and our colleagues, it's a difficult moment for media.

Ricky Mulvey: I'll also be curious to see what the long-term effects of a lot of these moves are. One of my buddies, who is a software engineer, a lot of the work that he's done at an entry level is talent development for a lot of big organizations. When that's passed to AI, his point is you're just going to have a slow leakage because everyone who knows things is going to move to different organizations or retire. Then you're going to be stuck with this longer term problem where you've developed no internal talent to take on the roles that middle managers and senior leaders need to do at your company, and you've eviscerated your firm system to use a baseball metaphor. I don't know if that'll entirely be true. Businesses are pretty nimble, but I do wonder if a lot of these companies are creating long-term problems for themselves by getting rid of the entry level positions.

Stacey Vanek Smith: I think that's probably true. That could account for why it's such a hard moment for recent grads in computer science to get jobs because the one young man, I keep wanting to say the kid that I talked to, but he was not a kid. He was a graduate in computer science with a job that he had lined up, but he said a lot of the entry level coding jobs were just being done by AI. He said he was using AI to do a lot of his coding, and I was like, do you think you would have had an assistant for that? He's like, maybe. He certainly would have taken a lot more of my time and he, I think, was at a little bit of a higher level, so he was OK, but I think you're right. A lot of the jobs that would have gone to people starting out that helped to build a pipeline, that help to funnel people into a career, I think a lot of those, especially in certain fields are getting snapped up by AI, for sure.

Ricky Mulvey: The other biggest economic story is tariffs. This is a tough topic to pre-record, but we shall try. We've had to make some edits in the past to let the listeners know because you record something one day, and then it turns out by Friday, when you're listening, that things get a little trickier. But from your economic lens, what are your biggest questions about this tariff story right now?

Stacey Vanek Smith: Tariffs, I'm so interested in this, and simultaneously also, so a little bit scared of it. You're so right. I do a lot of work for Marketplace, the public radio show, and I was talking to my editor there, and she said they will not assign any feature stories on tariffs anymore because things change so fast. She's like, we keep having to kill stories. I think Trump has changed tariff policies more than 50 times since he's taken office, 50 times. Usually trade deals, these are slow creaking wheels in the economy. They spend years hammering them out, and then they're in place forever. These are sleepy topics. There's this trade economist, Chad Bown, who's wonderful, and he has this podcast called Trade Talks. I remember, during Trump won, calling him and he was just like, this used to be the sleepiest job, and everyone would be like, what is there to even talk about? Do you ever get tired of talking about NAFTA? Now his phone is ringing off the hook because there are so many changes. I think the change is one of the big stories, honestly, all the back and forth, all the uncertainty. I think that there's a lot of speculation as to why Trump is doing that. Part of it's just that he likes making deals, and he changes his mind, and it's the threat that he can use.

To me, what it shows us, the American consumer has been the powerhouse of the global economy for decades now. American consumer spending is two-thirds of the US economy, but it's also almost 20% of the global economy, and so that is a lot of muscle to flex. I think Trump likes having that muscle to flex, but also the entire world's economy has accommodated itself around us buying tons of stuff. If that actually changes or even changes a little, I think the ripples from that are going to be immense. If these tariffs do go through at the scale that I think Liberation Day introduced, then I think we're in for a real problem. I always think about Argentina because I've done some reporting on Argentina. They put a whole bunch of protectionist tariffs in place in 2010. It completely destroyed their economy, and that is what keeps me up at night, I guess.

Ricky Mulvey: This is subject to change, but consumers are probably going to spend if prices don't rise dramatically. Right now, the economy is pretty much in the soft landing that the Fed wanted a while ago throughout this tariff spat. You had maximum employment mentioned by Fed Chair Powell, and you're also pretty close to that 2% inflation rate.

Stacey Vanek Smith: I know.

Ricky Mulvey: 2.1%, we round it. I would have thought that through Liberation Day, through these tariff policies, you would see prices rise immediately. I know you've done reporting on small businesses that are trying to figure out how to adjust prices, but what do you make of inflation staying pretty cool even throughout these economic tariff spat, economic dispute, trade war, whatever you want to call it?

Stacey Vanek Smith: This was a big shock to me too. This was another layer of vibe session because when the inflation report was coming out, the consumer price index, the CPI, this last one, I was like, here we go, because the tariffs have now been in place for a few months. Even though there's been a lot of back and forth, businesses have been padding their prices, businesses have had to try to find a way to cope with all the change too. I talked to one florist who was putting a flat fee on all of his bouquets because the tariffs on each of his flowers, which all came from different countries, was changing all the time. I still can't wrap my head around the fact inflation came down, and everyone's like, well, it's just a month of reprieve because businesses were able to stockpile stuff, like Apple. Tim Cook airlifted 600 tons of iPhones out of China, airlifted it. There is potentially some lag there. I just don't know anymore. I feel curiouser. It's like the Through the Looking-Glass economy. It is like the Lewis Carroll economy. Nothing seems to match up with what I think. Every time a report comes out, I'm like, here we go. Now we're going to see the stuff that I know we will see, we don't see it, and it could be that there is a lag in the case of the CPI and inflation numbers, I don't know.

Ricky Mulvey: I need to get my own phrase, like Kyla Scanlon got with vibecession. I need the opposite because you got economic growth slowing down, and yet the job market still appears to be strong on the surface. Also, the market is pretty close to all-time highs.

Stacey Vanek Smith: I know.

Ricky Mulvey: As we record this week, the S&P is pretty much made up from all of the losses that it initially withstood from Liberation Day. Its traders have completely brushed it off, but I think we are in a more volatile market. Stacey, as we wrap up, any other economic story lines you're watching that you're curious about right now?

Stacey Vanek Smith: Well, the thing that I'm watching, and maybe I'm watching it because it's the thing that lines up with the reality I've been observing, but it is the bond market. The bond market does seem to be flashing red, especially with the big beautiful bill, the tax cut extension going through Congress, which could potentially add $4 trillion to the deficit. The bond market does seem to be flashing red; like you said, nothing else is. Yes, we've got to come up with our anti-vibecession word, Ricky, but I will be watching the bond market, along with the markets and the job's numbers and inflation.

Ricky Mulvey: Stacey Vanek Smith, she's got a show, Everybody's Business. You can find it on Podcasts. Appreciate your time and your insight. Thanks for joining us on Motley Fool Money.

Stacey Vanek Smith: Thanks, Ricky. Great to be here.

Ricky Mulvey: As always, people on the program may have interests in the stocks they talk about, and the Motley Fool may have formal recommendations for or against, so don't buy or sell stocks based solely on what you hear. All personal finance content follows Motley Fool editorial standards and are not approved by advertisers. Advertisements are sponsored content provided for informational purposes only. See our full advertising disclosure. Please check out our show notes. Up next, Radar Stocks, stay right here. You're listening to Motley Fool Money.

I'm Ricky Mulvey, joined again by Jason Moser and David Meier. Before we get to Radar Stocks, I just want to point out, this is Rick Engdahl's final radio show. Rick is in the studio with us, the online studio, a longtime Fool, multimedia extraordinaire behind Rule Breaker Investing, Motley Fool Money, and Motley Fool Answers. He is a folk artist who somehow ended up at the Fool and an artist who's fixed problems that you, the listener, will never know existed. Rick, you are a total joy to work with. I will miss having you in recordings, and I look forward to seeing you in Colorado, man. I'm going to miss you. You'll hear him.

Rick Engdahl: Thank you very much, and I will miss all too.

Ricky Mulvey: Enough with the sentimentality. Let's get to stocks on our radar. That's promised every show, we got to do it. Our man behind the glass for the final time, Rick Engdahl is going to hit you with a question. Jason, you're up first. What are you looking at this week?

Jason Moser: Sure, a little company called Amazon, you may have heard of it, their ticker is AMZN, and coming off a pretty good core. But in news that is both fascinating and a little scary at the same time. Amazon's reportedly close to beginning testing human-like autonomous delivery methods, or in simpler terms, robots that deliver packages to your door. This is certainly quite futuristic and likely a ways away from becoming reality, but they're starting to test this stuff out. Given that it's working on humanoid robots for its warehouses, it's not that big of a leap to see how the technology could proliferate in time. Of course, agentic AI is behind it all in allowing these robots to actually understand and act on natural human language. It seems the future is now.

Ricky Mulvey: Rick, you got a quick question about Amazon or humanoid robots.

Rick Engdahl: Well, as you know, I tend to ask a little bit offbeat and witty questions. Since I have to hand this off, I'm going to have ChatGPT ask these questions for me, so I ask for some witty questions. Here you go. Is Amazon still a buy now or just a warehouse full of investor hopes?

Jason Moser: I think given the number of ways this company makes its money, I got to consider this thing a buy, still even today.

Ricky Mulvey: Real quick, David. Was that witty enough for you? Because it's your last show, I'll give you a 7 out of 10. David, quickly, what's on your radar this week?

David Meier: Mine is workflow management software company, Asana. Ticker is ASAN. This was a high flyer pre-pandemic that has come back down to Earth, and it's a more mature company today. It's still growing, but now it's generating cash, and it has a very bright future with its AI-related software that it's selling. Multiples are, I think, attractive today, so this is one that I am going to be looking at after letting go of the company in 2022.

Ricky Mulvey: Rick.

Rick Engdahl: This one's even better. Let's see. Is Asana the future of work or just working on its future?

Ricky Mulvey: Wow.

David Meier: It's a little of both because customers are using the software more and more, and that's a good thing for both the user and Asana.

Rick Engdahl: I appreciate you guys actually answering my questions there because they were really bad. I'm sure that AI will improve over time.

Ricky Mulvey: What are you putting on your watch list?

Rick Engdahl: I should, hold on a second, type in. Apparently, I'm going with Amazon.

Ricky Mulvey: We'll leave it there. Rick Engdahl, Jason Moser, David Meyer, thank you for being here. Thank you for listening to this week's Motley Fool Money.

JPMorgan Chase is an advertising partner of Motley Fool Money. John Mackey, former CEO of Whole Foods Market, an Amazon subsidiary, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. David Meier has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. Jason Moser has positions in Amazon and Docusign. Rick Engdahl has positions in Amazon and Tesla. Ricky Mulvey has positions in Lululemon Athletica Inc. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Amazon, CrowdStrike, Docusign, JPMorgan Chase, Lululemon Athletica Inc., and Tesla. The Motley Fool recommends Asana and Broadcom. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Down 20%, Is Lululemon a Buy?

Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now. Learn More »

Lululemon (NASDAQ: LULU) shares dropped roughly 20% in value last week after the company delivered an earnings report that included less enthusiastic earnings expectations for the year. While its revenues are still expected to be relatively in line with previous guidance, the added costs that tariffs will impose led management to dial back earnings estimates, causing the market to hit the stock pretty hard.

To be fair, Lululemon has historically been a fairly expensive stock, and companies need to produce solid results if they want to sustain higher valuations.

Lower guidance

Arguably the biggest factor impacting Lululemon shares right now is the guidance cut. Yes, the apparel retailer beat estimates for the first quarter, but management nonetheless reduced earnings per share (EPS) expectations for the year to a range of $14.58 to $14.78 compared to previous guidance of $14.95 to $15.15.

As with most things these days, the weaker outlook is largely due to President Donald Trump's tariffs. Clothing companies like Lululemon largely hire overseas subcontractors to do the manufacturing of their clothes, which puts them in the crosshairs of Trump's policies. When I wrote about Lululemon in April, I noted that the tariffs Trump was imposing on Vietnam would impact 40% of Lululemon's production. Though those new taxes are currently paused, the president set the tariff rate on imports from that country at 46%.

Woman sitting doing exercise

Image Source: Getty Images

Despite a 7% increase in revenue, Lululemon's earnings fell year over year in its fiscal 2025 first quarter. For the period, which ended May 4, net income was $314 million compared to $321 million a year earlier; a lower overall share count was responsible for its EPS growth. According to CNBC, comp sales increased a mere 1% compared to Wall Street's expectations for a 3% increase.

From what I can see, Lululemon has two main problems. Its costs of production will rise due to tariffs while the premium prices it charges for its goods could be putting a damper on its sales, especially in the United States, where recent Commerce Department reports have shown weak consumer spending growth.

Valuation

One positive that can be pointed out for the stock is its now-lower valuation. According to fullratio.com, Lululemon has historically averaged a P/E ratio of around 42. After the stock's latest pullback, investors can pick up shares for a mere 17 times earnings. Based on the low end of the company's new guidance for 2025, the stock is trading at roughly 18 times forward earnings. But are these valuations low enough to make the stock a buy?

Previously, my stance was that the market conditions Lululemon faces make it a stock to avoid for the time being. That's still my view. CFO Meghan Frank said that the company plans to make some "strategic" price increases on certain items to pass their tariff costs along to their customers. However, I don't see how the company can keep raising prices on what are already $100 leggings. Granted, Lululemon has really branched out into different categories, even offering golf-oriented apparel, but I still think that any price increases will be a problem at a time when U.S. consumers are tightening their belts. The combination of high tariffs and reduced consumer discretionary spending is going to pressure apparel brands like Lululemon and Nike (NYSE: NKE). Until those headwinds abate, there isn't going to be much momentum here.

As a final note, I would also add that Lululemon operates in a highly competitive area of the apparel industry. It's constantly vying for market share and consumer attention with the likes of Nike, Gap (NYSE: GAP), and others. In the end, prices do matter in that fight.

Should you invest $1,000 in Lululemon Athletica Inc. right now?

Before you buy stock in Lululemon Athletica Inc., consider this:

The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Lululemon Athletica Inc. wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.

Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $657,871!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $875,479!*

Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 998% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 174% for the S&P 500. Don’t miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor.

See the 10 stocks »

*Stock Advisor returns as of June 9, 2025

David Butler has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Lululemon Athletica Inc. and Nike. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Down 48% From Its Peak, Is This Market-Crushing Growth Stock a Buy Now?

Lululemon athletica (NASDAQ: LULU) might not have the profile of a traditional market-crushing stock, but it's been one of the best-performing consumer-facing stocks of the last 20 years.

More than any other company, Lululemon is responsible for making athleisure a massive apparel category, and it's made it one of the most valuable apparel companies in the world.

Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now. Learn More »

Going back to its 2006 IPO, the stock is up roughly 1,800%, and even over the last decade, the stock has gained more than 300% as it's continued to deliver strong growth.

However, more recently the stock has struggled. After peaking in late 2023, shares have fallen on concerns about its valuation, slowing growth, and now the trade war and the broader threat to the global economy. The stock is now down 48% from its peak.

Lululemon tumbled in its first-quarter earnings report as comparable sales growth slowed to just 1% with comps down 2% in the Americas. Revenue in the quarter rose 7% to $2.37 billion as the company continues to open new stores, which matched estimates.

Further down the income statement, gross margin improved from 57.7% to 58.3%, but operating income rose just 1% to $438.6 million as operating margin fell 110 basis points to 18.5% due to an increase in selling, general, and administrative expenses.

On the bottom line, earnings per share increased from $2.54 to $2.60, which edged out the consensus of $2.59.

A person doing yoga on the beach.

Image source: Getty Images.

What's ailing Lululemon

What really pressured the stock was the company's guidance, due in part to the impact of tariffs as management said price hikes to absorb tariffs would be targeted and limited.

For the full year, Lululemon maintained revenue guidance of $11.15 billion to $11.3 billion, or 6% revenue growth at the midpoint. However, it cut its full-year earnings-per-share guidance from $14.95-$15.15 to $14.58-$14.78.

Second-quarter guidance also missed the mark.

Lululemon's decision to maintain revenue guidance with a growth rate that's steady from the first quarter shows that it doesn't anticipate a significant impact on demand. Rather, the challenges the company is facing are on the cost side, primarily due to tariffs.

The company now expects operating margin to fall 160 basis points, weighing on earnings per share.

The China opportunity

While Lululemon's growth has slowed in its core North American market, the company continues to see a long runway in China, which represents its biggest market for new store growth.

In the first quarter, revenue in China increased 21% on 7% comparable sales growth, and China made up 13% of total revenue last year.

Like other American consumer brands that have done well in China like Apple, Starbucks, and Nike, Lululemon seems to be benefiting from the same upscale brand reputation that those companies have as well as a culture of conspicuous consumption. Additionally, Lululemon has managed to deliver solid growth in China even as the consumer economy has been weak there.

The retailer currently has 154 stores in China, 20% of its total, and it had an initial goal of opening 200 stores, though it now expects to top that. CFO Meghan Frank said, "We still feel we're early in our journey" in China on the earnings call.

Is Lululemon a buy?

Lululemon's challenges with tariffs seem to be similar to what we've heard from other retailers in apparel and related sectors, so it shouldn't be a cause for alarm from investors. Meanwhile, the tariff situation is fluid enough that rates could easily change, and it's unclear if the tariffs will still be relevant a few years from now.

After cutting its guidance for the year and Friday's sell-off, Lululemon now trades at a forward P/E of 18. For a company with its brand strength, historical growth rate, and a runway to expand in China, that looks like a great price.

While investors may have to be patient as the trade war plays out, at the current price, Lululemon looks like a clear buy.

Should you invest $1,000 in Lululemon Athletica Inc. right now?

Before you buy stock in Lululemon Athletica Inc., consider this:

The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Lululemon Athletica Inc. wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.

Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $669,517!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $868,615!*

Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 792% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 173% for the S&P 500. Don’t miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor.

See the 10 stocks »

*Stock Advisor returns as of June 2, 2025

Jeremy Bowman has positions in Nike and Starbucks. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Apple, Lululemon Athletica Inc., Nike, and Starbucks. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

lululemon (LULU) Q1 2025 Earnings Call Transcript

Logo of jester cap with thought bubble.

Image source: The Motley Fool.

DATE

Thursday, June 5, 2025 at 4:30 p.m. ET

CALL PARTICIPANTS

Chief Executive Officer — Calvin McDonald

Chief Financial Officer — Meghan Frank

Need a quote from one of our analysts? Email [email protected]

RISKS

Chief Financial Officer Frank stated, "We did lower our op margin for the full year from 100 basis points decline year over year to 160. That's all driven by the net impact of tariffs."

Frank said, "We expect gross margin in Q2 to decline approximately 200 basis points compared to Q2 2024," citing increased occupancy, depreciation, tariffs, higher markdowns, and foreign exchange.

Frank said, "SG&A was above our guidance of 120 basis points of deleverage due predominantly to the negative impact from an FX revaluation loss."

Frank noted, "given consumer confidence and macroeconomic as we move into the second half of the year, we feel it's prudent to tick up our forecast slightly on the markdown line."

TAKEAWAYS

Revenue: lululemon athletica inc. (NASDAQ:LULU) reported $2.4 billion, up 7%, or 8% in constant currency.

Comparable Sales: Increased 1%; Americas comparable sales declined 1%, China Mainland increased 8%, Rest of World increased 7%.

Americas Revenue: Rose 3%, or 4% in constant currency; Canada up 4% (9% in constant currency), U.S. up 2%.

China Mainland Revenue: Grew 21%, or 22% in constant currency; management attributed a four-point impact to the Chinese New Year calendar shift.

Rest of World Revenue: Increased 16%, or 17% in constant currency.

Store Network: 770 global stores at quarter-end; three net new stores opened, square footage up 14% year over year.

Digital Revenue: $961 million, representing 41% of total revenue.

Category Growth: Men's revenue up 8%, women's up 7%, accessories and other up 8%.

Gross Margin: Increased 60 basis points to 58.3% (GAAP), driven by lower product cost, improved damages, improved markdowns, and leverage on fixed costs; 130 basis points improvement in product margin offset by 50 basis points deleverage on fixed costs and 20 basis points of FX pressure.

SG&A Expenses: $943 million, or 39.8% of revenue; deleveraged 120 basis points year over year (GAAP), above guidance due to FX revaluation loss.

Operating Income: $439 million, 18.5% of net revenue; operating margin declined from 19% in the prior year period.

Diluted EPS: $2.60 per diluted share, up from $2.54 in the prior year; full-year diluted EPS (GAAP) guidance is $14.58 to $14.78, compared to $14.64 in the prior year.

Inventory: Dollar value up 23%, units up 16%; increases attributed to higher average unit cost due to tariffs and FX.

Share Repurchases: 1,360,000 shares repurchased for $430 million at an average price of $316; $1.1 billion remaining in share repurchase authorization.

Balance Sheet: $1.3 billion in cash, no debt.

Full-Year Revenue Guidance: $11.15 billion to $11.3 billion, implying 5%-7% growth, or 7%-8% excluding the prior year’s fifty-third week.

Store Growth Guidance: 40-45 net new company-operated stores expected for the year; majority of new stores international, mainly China.

Gross Margin Guidance: Full-year gross margin (GAAP) expected to decrease 110 basis points due to tariffs and slightly higher markdowns; Q2 gross margin expected to decline 200 basis points from the prior year period.

SG&A Guidance: Full-year SG&A deleverage of 50 basis points expected; Q2 deleverage of 170-190 basis points from the prior year period.

Operating Margin Guidance: Operating margin (GAAP) expected to fall by 160 basis points year over year.

Capital Expenditures: $152 million in the quarter; full-year guidance of $740 million-$760 million, targeting growth, distribution centers, store expansion, and technology.

Tariff Mitigation: Management is planning "modest" price increases on select items, supply chain efficiency actions, and targeted sourcing shifts, with mitigation expected mainly in the second half of the year.

Brand Awareness: Unaided U.S. brand awareness rose from the mid-30% range in the prior quarter to 40% in the current quarter.

Product Innovation: New products such as Align No Line, Daydrift, Glow Up, and Be Calm received positive responses, with key launches selling out and full distribution planned for the back half.

SUMMARY

Management maintained full-year revenue guidance and highlighted international momentum, with China Mainland revenue up 22% in constant currency despite a calendar shift. Operating and gross margin guidance were revised downward, as management cited tariff impacts and plans for only modest, targeted price increases on a limited portion of the assortment. Digital revenue contributed 41% of the mix, and product innovation was a focus, with several new launches receiving rapid sell-through and positive guest feedback.

Chief Executive Officer McDonald said, "we gained market share across both men's and women's in the premium athletic wear market in the United States."

Management confirmed strategic investments remain on track across distribution, new markets, and technology, supported by $1.3 billion in cash and no debt.

Tariff mitigation actions—including pricing and sourcing—are expected to have greater impact in the second half of the year, with gross margin pressure front-loaded into Q2.

Inventory growth in dollars outpaced units, with management attributing the differential to tariffs and FX, but asserting inventory quality and composition remain healthy.

Brand activations and campaigns, such as Summer of Align, contributed to the sequential rise in unaided U.S. awareness, reflecting ongoing investment in grassroots and omni-channel engagement.

INDUSTRY GLOSSARY

Optimization: Reconfiguration or relocation of existing store sites to improve productivity, size, or guest experience.

Co-located Strategy: Approach of expanding or opening larger-format stores within high-traffic locations to offer a fuller assortment across categories.

Daydrift/Align No Line/Glow Up/Be Calm: Proprietary product franchises or new lines referenced by name, representing recent innovations in lululemon athletica inc.’s assortment.

Fifty-third Week: An additional fiscal week in the prior reporting year, impacting year-over-year comparisons.

Full Conference Call Transcript

Calvin McDonald, CEO, and Meghan Frank, CFO. Before we get started, I'd like to take this opportunity to remind you that our remarks today will include forward-looking statements reflecting management's current forecast of certain aspects of Lululemon's future. These statements are based on current information, which we have assessed but which by its nature is dynamic and subject to rapid and even abrupt changes. Actual results may differ materially from those contained in or implied by these forward-looking statements due to risks and uncertainties associated with our business, including those we have disclosed in our most recent filings with the SEC, including our annual report on Form 10-Ks and our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q.

Any forward-looking statements that we make on this call are based on assumptions as of today. We expressly disclaim any obligation or undertaking to update or revise any of these statements as a result of new information or future events. During this call, we will present both GAAP and non-GAAP financial measures. A reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP measures is included in our quarterly report on Form 10-Q and in today's earnings press release. In addition, the comparable sales metrics given on today's call are on a constant dollar basis. The press release and accompanying quarterly report on Form 10-Q are available under the Investors section of our website at www.lululemon.com.

Before we begin the call, I'd like to remind our investors to visit our Investor site where you'll find a summary of our key financial and operating statistics for the first quarter as well as our quarterly infographic. Today's call is scheduled for one hour, so please limit yourself to one question at a time to give others the opportunity to have their questions addressed. And now, I would like to turn the call over to Calvin.

Calvin McDonald: Thank you, Howard. It's good to be here with you today to discuss our first quarter results. As you've seen from our press release, our revenue growth for the quarter came in at the high end of our guidance range. I'm pleased with this performance, which was relatively consistent with quarter four. I'd also note that our revenue in the United States grew 2%, which is an improvement in the trend we've seen over the last several quarters. Based on our quarter one revenue performance and what we're seeing thus far in quarter two, we are maintaining our revenue guidance for the full year.

As we look ahead, we will continue to leverage our financial strength and our position in the marketplace to play offense, remain agile, and successfully manage the environment around us. I'll begin by sharing the details of our quarter one performance, including high-level financial metrics and key highlights regarding our regional performance, product innovation, and our brand campaigns and activations. Next, I'll provide insights into the planning and strategies we're deploying related to the increase in tariffs. Meghan will speak to the specific financial implications, and I'll share some insights into the opportunities we have across the business. I'll then share my thoughts on quarter two and the remainder of the year.

Meghan will review our financials and our updated guidance, and we will conclude by taking your questions. Let's get started. In quarter one, total revenue increased 7% or 8% on a constant currency basis. Gross margin increased 60 basis points to 58.3%, and earnings per share were $2.60, ahead of our expectations. In addition, in quarter one, we continued repurchasing shares and bought back another $430 million of stock. Our ongoing repurchases demonstrate the strength of our balance sheet and our continued confidence in the long-term prospects for Lululemon.

Looking at our regional performance, we continue to see strength across markets driven by our high-performance, high-style merchandise and the compelling ways we engage with our guests through brand activations and community events. In North America, momentum continued in Canada, where sales grew 9% in constant currency, and in the United States, revenue growth improved to 2%. We're making progress on our assortment, and we've seen good response to many of our new innovations. But my sense is that in the U.S., consumers remain cautious right now, and they are being very intentional about their buying decisions. Even with this, we gained market share across both men's and women's in the premium athletic wear market in the United States.

In China Mainland, revenue increased 22% in constant currency. As you are aware, Chinese New Year shifted from quarter one of this year to Q4 of last year. While we estimate that this calendar shift had a negative impact of about four percentage points on Q1 revenue growth, we remain pleased with the underlying momentum in this very important growth market. And in the rest of the world, revenue increased 17% in constant currency as we continue to see a strong acceptance of our brand by guests across the APAC and EMEA regions. We are executing against our strategy to maximize our existing markets, expand in newer markets, while also seeding others for future growth.

I'm excited by the recent store openings in two of our franchise markets, Denmark and Turkey, which are off to a strong start, and we remain on track to enter Italy as a new company-operated market and Belgium and the Czech Republic under a franchise model later this year. When looking at the full year, our view on revenue is unchanged, and we continue to expect 7% to 8% growth. By region, we continue to anticipate revenue in North America to increase in the low to mid-single-digit range, China Mainland to grow in the 25% to 30% range, and revenue in the Rest of World segment to increase about 20%.

Key to our success within all our markets is our product, which offers unique and innovative solutions for guests across both athletic and lifestyle product categories. Throughout quarter one, guests responded well to the newness we introduced into our assortment. For women, our defined franchise continues to perform well across our markets globally, and we are pleased with the response to our recent launches, including Daydrift, Shake It Out, and Be Calm. For men, we're seeing strength in several of our key franchises, including Zeroed In, Smooth Spacer, and Show Zero.

In May, to celebrate the ten-year anniversary of our Align franchise, we launched Align No Line, which offers the same fit and feel as the iconic legging but without a front seam. We're pleased with the guest response both online and in the 80 doors where it was offered. We plan to build on this momentum for the fall when we roll it to all stores. I'm excited with the innovations we've rolled out this year and will continue to bring to market going forward. We have significant opportunity to expand all five of our key activities: yoga, run, train, golf, and tennis, and become the top-of-mind destination for guests who enjoy these activities.

Recent examples include our new Fast and Free running short for men, and for women, we launched additional styles which leveraged the research and development our teams conducted last year for our further ultra-marathon event. Switching now to our brand activations. Our teams continue to develop unique and compelling brand campaigns and community events that engage our guests, increase brand awareness, and support our product launches. Let me highlight a recent example. To support the launch and to celebrate Align's anniversary, we created our Summer of Align campaign. This fully integrated campaign included traditional and social media, exclusive experiences and events, and featured several influencers and ambassadors.

We hosted events around the world, including our Lululemon roller rink activation at the Bottle Rock Festival in Napa Valley and our largest-ever yoga experience in China, attended by 5,000 people in Beijing. This campaign and the other events we activated in quarter one is a great example of how we remain focused on our grassroots approach to guest engagement while at the same time leveraging traditional media assets and our roster of ambassadors to support product launches and build our brand. In fact, our unaided brand awareness in the United States grew from the mid-30s in quarter four to 40% in quarter one. I would now like to talk for a moment about the current environment related to tariffs.

Meghan will speak to our assumptions and the implications of potential higher rates during her guidance discussion. But I first want to spend a few minutes sharing our approach. The current tariff paradigm has brought uncertainty into the retail environment. As consumers try to assess the impact they will have on daily life, as businesses evaluate these impacts as well, I believe we are better positioned than most to navigate the near term while also maintaining our focus on investing in our growth potential over the long term. We are operating from a position of strength. Our brand remains strong, our guest engagement is high, we offer a compelling value proposition, and we are a highly profitable business.

Let me share a few details. We have an industry-leading operating margin. This allows us to continue investing across our strategic roadmap to enable long-term growth while managing any increased costs associated with tariffs. Our balance sheet is strong with $1.3 billion in cash and no debt, which provides us significant financial flexibility. We are making progress with our newness, have a robust pipeline of innovation, and our guests are responding well to many of the new solutions we are bringing into our assortment. And our premium positioning in the performance athletic apparel category yields different elasticity for our products relative to fashion-oriented brands.

We believe our guests will continue to live an active and healthy lifestyle and turn to us for the technical apparel we are known for. Shifting now to how we have been navigating this situation. Over the past few months, our teams have been looking across the enterprise for how we can offset increased tariff rates. Our work streams include prudently managing expenses, identifying efficiencies within our supply chain, and evaluating our position in the marketplace related to pricing. During COVID, we developed a strong muscle across our teams to be agile, pull levers across the business within a rapidly changing external environment, and simultaneously plan for multiple scenarios.

We are applying the same approach now as we maintain a disciplined focus on expenses, look across our supply chain, leverage our dual sourcing capabilities, engage in costing discussions with our vendors, and review pricing scenarios to ensure we sit where we want in the market, are pricing appropriately for the innovation in our assortment, and maximize any opportunity to gain market share. We have always been and will continue to be very intentional with our pricing decisions. These actions will be targeted and will reflect the work we've done on style elasticity. We remain nimble in our approach and feel we are well positioned during this period with many levers to pull.

Before handing it over to Meghan to discuss our financials, I wanted to share my perspective on quarter two and the remainder of the year. It's been approximately a year since we've made the changes in our product organization, and I'm pleased with our evolved structure, the way the teams are working together, and the efficiencies we're seeing across our processes. We still have work to do to create new products that have the potential to grow into core franchises and further optimize our merchandise mix. However, we are moving in the right direction.

And looking at the remainder of 2025, our teams are focused on strengthening our product pipeline and bringing more innovation into our core assortment while also introducing new styles with the potential to become key franchises and core items in the future, expanding deeper and bringing new technical solutions into our five key activities while further developing our lifestyle assortment, engaging more deeply with our guests through community activations, brand campaigns, and leveraging our membership program, and expanding our highly productive square footage profile through new store openings and optimizations.

As I hand it over to Meghan, I want to also say that while we recognize that quarter two has some pressures related to our planned business investments and additional expenses related to tariffs, we feel good about the full year and our ability to maintain our revenue guidance for 2025. There is considerable opportunity ahead for Lululemon, and we're intent on successfully navigating the near term while we plan for and invest in the long term. With that, I'll now hand it over to Meghan.

Meghan Frank: Thanks, Calvin. I'm happy we delivered Q1 results that exceeded our expectations. Guests are responding well to our product newness and innovations. As a result, we are maintaining our revenue guidance for the full year. Given the uncertainties in the macro environment, our approach to planning remains balanced on managing the dynamics of the current year while also maintaining our focus on the long term. We are managing expenses prudently while also continuing to invest to drive long-term growth and set ourselves up for future success. This includes new store openings and optimizations, new market entries, growing brand awareness, and ensuring we have adequate capacity across our supply chain. I'll share our detailed guidance with you in a moment.

But let's first take a look at our Q1 results in detail. For Q1, total net revenue rose 7% or 8% in constant currency to $2.4 billion. Comparable sales increased 1%. Within our regions, results were as follows: Americas revenue increased 3% or 4% in constant currency with comparable sales down 1%. By country, revenue increased 4% or 9% in constant currency in Canada and increased 2% in the U.S. China Mainland revenue increased 21% or 22% in constant currency with comparable sales increasing 8%, and in the rest of the world, revenue grew by 16% or 17% in constant currency with comparable sales increasing by 7%.

In our store channel, total sales increased 8%, and we ended the quarter with 770 stores globally. Square footage increased 14% versus last year, driven by the addition of 59 net new Lululemon stores since Q1 2024. During the quarter, we opened three net new stores and completed four optimizations. In our digital channel, revenue increased percent and contributed $961 million of top or 41% of total revenue. And by category, men's revenue increased 8% versus last year, while women's increased 7%, and accessories and other grew 8%. Gross profit for the first quarter was $1.4 billion or 58.3% of net revenue compared to a gross margin of 57.7% in Q1 2024.

The gross profit rate in Q1 was ahead of our guidance and increased 60 basis points driven primarily by the following: a 130 basis point increase in product margin driven predominantly by lower product cost, improved damages, and improved markdowns offset somewhat by higher airfreight. A 20 basis points negative impact from foreign exchange and 50 basis points of net deleverage on fixed costs. Relative to our guidance, which was for gross margin approximately flat with last year, the upside was driven predominantly by lower product costs, leverage on fixed costs, and slightly better markdowns. Moving to SG&A. Our approach continues to be grounded in prudently managing our expenses while also continuing to strategically invest in our long-term growth opportunities.

SG&A expenses were $943 million or 39.8% of net revenue compared to 38.1% of net revenue for the same period last year. SG&A was above our guidance of 120 basis points of deleverage due predominantly to the negative impact from an FX revaluation loss. Operating income for the quarter was $439 million or 18.5% of net revenue compared to an operating margin of 19% in Q1 2024. Tax expense for the quarter was $136 million or 30.2% of pre-tax earnings, compared to an effective tax rate of 29.5% a year ago. Net income for the quarter was $315 million or $2.60 per diluted share compared to EPS of $2.54 for the first quarter of 2024.

Capital expenditures were $152 million for the quarter compared to $131 million for the first quarter last year. Q1 spend relates primarily to investments that support business growth, including our multi-year distribution center project, store capital for new locations, relocations and renovations, and technology investments. Turning to our balance sheet highlights, we ended the quarter with approximately $1.3 billion in cash and cash equivalents. Dollar inventory, which was impacted by higher AUC related to tariffs and foreign exchange, increased 23%. When looking at units, increased 16%. We repurchased 1,360,000 shares in Q1 at an average price of $316.

Share repurchases remain our preferred method to return cash to shareholders, and we currently have approximately $1.1 billion remaining on a repurchase program. Let me now share our updated guidance outlook for the full year 2025. We continue to expect revenue in the range of $11.15 to $11.3 billion. This range represents growth of 5% to 7% relative to 2024. Excluding the fifty-third week that we had in the fourth quarter of last year, we expect revenue to grow 7% to 8%. We continue to expect 40 to 45 net new company-operated stores in 2025 and to complete approximately 40 optimizations. We expect overall square footage growth in the low double digits.

Our new store openings in 2025 will include approximately 10 to 15 stores in The Americas, with the rest of our openings planned in our international markets, the majority of which will be in China. For the full year, we now expect gross to decrease approximately 110 basis points versus 2024. Relative to our prior guidance for a 60 basis point decrease, we expect the additional 50 basis points of deleverage to be driven predominantly by increased tariffs offset somewhat by our enterprise-wide efforts to mitigate these costs and slightly higher markdowns. When looking specifically at tariffs, the assumptions we've made regarding rates include 30% incremental tariffs on China, and an incremental 10% on the remaining countries where we source.

From a mitigation standpoint, as Calvin said, we've looked across the enterprise and have identified several levers which will help offset much of the impact of these higher rates. Based on our implementation strategies, we expect our mitigation efforts to be most impactful in the second half of the year. Turning to SG&A for the full year. We expect deleverage of approximately 50 basis points versus 2024. Relatively in line with our prior guidance. Driven by FX headwinds and ongoing investments into our Power of Three times Two roadmap, including investments in marketing and brand building aimed at increasing our awareness and acquiring new guests, investments to support our international growth and market expansion, and continued investment in technology.

When looking at operating margin for the full year 2025, we now expect a decrease of approximately 160 basis points versus 2024. For the full year 2025, we continue to expect our effective tax rate to be approximately 30%. For the fiscal year 2025, we now expect diluted earnings per share in the range of $14.58 to $14.78 versus EPS of $14.64 in 2024. Our EPS guidance excludes the impact of any future share repurchases but does include the impact of our repurchases year to date. We expect capital expenditures to be approximately $740 million to $760 million in 2025.

The spend relates to investments to support business growth, including a continuation of our multi-year distribution center project, store capital for new locations, relocations and renovations, and technology investments. Shifting now to Q2. We expect revenue in the range of $2.535 billion to $2.56 billion, representing growth of 7% to 8%. We expect to open 14 net new company-operated stores in Q2 and complete nine optimizations. We expect gross margin in Q2 to decline approximately 200 basis points relative to Q2 2024. Driven predominantly by increased occupancy and depreciation, higher tariff rates, modestly higher markdowns, and foreign exchange. In Q2, we expect our SG&A rate to deleverage by 170 to 190 basis points relative to Q2 2024.

This will be driven predominantly by increased foundational investments and related depreciation, and strategic investments, including those to build brand awareness. In addition, as I mentioned last quarter, we were layering back on certain expenses, including store labor hours, which are having a more pronounced impact on Q2 relative to the remainder of the year. When looking at operating margin for Q2, we expect a year-over-year decrease of approximately 380 basis points. I wanted to add some additional context on our operating margin guidance. In Q2 last year, margin improved by 110 basis points, which was our strongest performance of the year.

This year, as I mentioned, we are also being impacted by external factors, namely tariffs, where our mitigation efforts are more pronounced in the back half, and foreign exchange. In addition, we are continuing to invest in our strategic roadmap to set ourselves up for ongoing success. While these items are having an outsized impact on Q2, when looking at the full year, the decrease in operating margin is significantly less. Turning to EPS, we expect earnings per share in the second quarter to be in the range of $2.85 to $2.90 versus EPS of $3.01 a year ago. We expect our effective tax rate in Q2 to be approximately 30%.

When looking at inventory, we expect units to increase in the low double digits in Q2, with dollar inventories up in the low 20s, due in large part to the impact of higher tariff rates and foreign exchange. We expect a similar dynamic in inventory growth for the remainder of the year. In Q2, the low double-digit unit growth reflects our investments in newness and innovation. In addition, we are comping a 6% decline in units in the prior year. We are pleased with both the level and composition of our inventory, which positions us well. And with that, I will turn it back over to Calvin.

Calvin McDonald: Thank you, Meghan. I feel we are well positioned to navigate the current period. We intend to leverage our strong financial position and competitive advantages to play offense while making deliberate decisions and continuing to invest in our growth opportunities. In closing, I want to thank our talented leaders and teams who make these results possible and demonstrate their agility and passion each day. We'll now take your questions. Operator?

Operator: Thank you. We'll now begin the question and answer session. Our first question is from Dana Telsey with Telsey Group. Please go ahead.

Dana Telsey: Hi, good afternoon everyone. As you think about the guidance for the balance of the year and the pressure on Q2, before you have some mitigation efforts in the back half of the year, can you expand on those mitigation efforts and what you're thinking about, whether it's price increases, diversifying sourcing, how should we think about it? And then when you think about just the U.S. business, any category strength that you saw with the newness that you offered and any early indications on the no-line Align, which frankly I've heard good sell-throughs? Thank you.

Meghan Frank: Thanks, Dana. I think given the dynamic of the year in terms of Q2 relative to the full year, it's important to anchor in the full year where we guided to a decline of 160 basis points versus our prior guide of 100, which is really related to the net impact of tariffs as well as the slight increase in markdowns. When we think about the tariff impact to mitigation actions, I'd highlight, one would be pricing. We are planning to take strategic price increases, looking item by item across our assortment as we typically do, and it will be price increases on a small portion of our assortment, and they will be modest in nature.

And then on the sourcing side, we are also pursuing some efficiency actions there, some of which will impact the second half of this year, and then we are also focused on that into 2026 as well. And I'll pass it over to Calvin on the product side.

Calvin McDonald: Yes. Thanks, Dana. In terms of category trends on newness, what's very encouraging is that it's balanced. It's balanced across our activity in lifestyle, new item introductions, as well as new and updates to our current. So just walk through a few of these. On the lifestyle side of our business, as you've seen and introduced at the beginning of Q1 and sold out pretty much in all doors, was our Daydrift trouser, which used performance fabrics with unique updated style, and she responded incredibly well to that. And we will be back in stock fully with some expanded silhouettes for September. So we're very encouraged and believe we have a future core success on our hands.

Be Calm, another new core, future core, and she responded very well to both, had great rating reviews. On the activity side of our business, we balanced between new as well as updates. On the new side, Glow Up was well received, good reviews, continues to gain momentum. And again, introduced with a limited set of colors, and we continue to build and expand into that. And again, feel we have a very unique legging creating a unique sensation and unmet need for Train and seeing good success. And then on updates to our existing core, Align No Line is a great example of that. And early results but very encouraging as you alluded to.

And we only had it distributed to 80 doors. So again, we are chasing and we'll be in full store distribution by September. You'll see it get stronger and distributed more throughout the quarter. But this is one in which across all of these and when I referenced the response to newness is encouraging and these being some of the strong hits both from a newness and innovation standpoint, definitely we saw a sellout and are chasing excited about what that means for the back half. But balanced across activity lifestyle, new as well as updates. So we know the newness is resonating and working well.

And the team is busy chasing into these what appear to be future hits for us. Thank you.

Operator: The next question is from Janine Stichter with Jefferies. Please go ahead.

Janine Stichter: Hi, thanks for taking my question. I was hoping you could dig in a little bit more to the comp drivers, the top line drivers. Think last quarter you had talked about traffic falling off, but seeing some improvements in transaction size and solid performance in conversion. Wondering if still seeing the same thing then maybe any update on the progression of the quarter, what you saw in April into May? Thank you.

Meghan Frank: Hi, Janine. So in terms of comp drivers, as we talked about on the last call, we did see a decline in store traffic, particularly in the U.S. As we moved from Q4 into Q1. We did see that moderate somewhat, but we did still for the first quarter see a lower traffic trend in stores relative to Q4. Conversion trends remained relatively consistent, a little bit of a decline year over year. And then also we did see an uptick in terms of average dollars per transaction in the first quarter. And then in terms of how it's progressing April into May, we don't share specifics on Q2, but I would say nothing materially different.

Janine Stichter: Great. Thanks so much.

Operator: Thank you. The next question is from Brian Nagel with Oppenheimer. Please go ahead.

Brian Nagel: Hi, good afternoon. A couple of questions. I'm going to merge them together, both tied around kind of tariffs and your strategy for tariffs. I guess the first question, if I'm hearing you, I mean, as you're looking at these tariffs, it sounds like you're going to take the biggest hits on margin. So the question I have is, why not at least initially or do more with price? And then secondly, as we look at the guidance now, sort of say the bigger disconnect between top and bottom line, is that all, is that mostly tariffs or I think you did mention some other investment spending in there? Thanks.

Meghan Frank: Thanks, Brian. So in terms of top line versus bottom line, so for the full year, we maintained our revenue guide, so $11.15 billion to $11.3 billion. We did lower our op margin for the full year from 100 basis points decline year over year to 160. That's all driven by the net impact of tariffs. So the tariff impact then with some offsets, as I mentioned, in pricing and supply chain. And then a slight increase also in markdowns. They're not any meaningful changes in terms of our expense posture. We're maintaining our focus on the long term.

And as I mentioned, we do have some mitigation actions on tariffs that will also come into play as we get into 2026. In terms of price, as mentioned, we're really looking at this as operating from a position of strength, being strategic in our pricing, looking at our LS and where we have opportunity, and we'll continue to take a look at that as the year progresses. But feeling comfortable with our positioning at the state.

Brian Nagel: Okay. Thank you.

Operator: The next question is from Matthew Boss with JPMorgan. Please go ahead.

Matthew Boss: Great. Thanks. So Calvin, maybe could you elaborate on the progression of comps that you saw over the course of the first quarter? And on the start to the second quarter that you cited, I guess if we think about it relative to first quarter performance in The Americas, and in China? Does the 7% to 8% revenue guidance for the quarter, does that embed a moderation in June and July trends relative to what you've seen in May, just given the uncertainty and the dynamic backdrop?

Meghan Frank: Hey, Matt. So in terms of how the quarter progressed, no material changes in terms of trend month to month in Q1. As we look to Q2, we don't guide to specifics in Q2, but what I can share is, I would say similar trends in the U.S. relative to Q1. As you know, China was impacted by the timing of Chinese New Year in Q1, which was about a four-point delta. So I would say our expectation and current trends would be in line with our annual color we offered on China performance, which should be in the 25% to 30% range.

Matthew Boss: Great. And then maybe Meghan just a follow-up as it relates to second quarter guidance and the full year. I guess could you elaborate on the slight increase in markdowns now contemplated in the full year outlook? And maybe just how you see the progression in the second quarter versus back half?

Meghan Frank: Yes. In terms of markdowns, so we did actually see a decline in markdowns in the first quarter. So we haven't seen an uptick in markdowns in our results to date. We were down 10 basis points in Q1. But given consumer confidence and macroeconomic as we move into the second half of the year, we feel it's prudent to tick up our forecast slightly on the markdown line. We would be in the range of 10 to 20 basis points above last year, so not meaningfully higher than our last year water line, which was relatively, I would say, in line with history.

Matthew Boss: But you're saying first quarter and so far into the second quarter? That you haven't seen the need to take the markdowns. It's just an assumption that you've baked in given the backdrop.

Meghan Frank: Yes. I would say on our actuals, in Q1, we saw a downward trend of 10 basis points, and our markdown positioning in Q2 would be embedded in our guidance.

Matthew Boss: Okay. That's great color. Thank you.

Operator: The next question is from Brooke Roach with Goldman Sachs. Please go ahead.

Brooke Roach: Good afternoon and thank you for taking our question. Calvin, given some of the success of some of the new launches that you've seen year to date, can you elaborate on your latest thoughts about returning the U.S. business to sustainable comp growth and whether or not that differs at all in your Canada versus U.S. as you contemplate North America reported comps?

Calvin McDonald: Thanks, Brooke. When I look at what we control, in terms of our mix of newness, and how that's performing, especially the new intended core and the way the guest is responding to that, definitely positive and feel good about those reactions to it. And the team knows and is working on what they can continue to add and innovate to that. When I look at our performance versus the market, our performance, we gained market share in the premium activewear. We had strong performance gains against our peers in this segment of the market where we compete. And the macro consumer is different. We continue to see a more cautious, discerning consumer.

We're definitely not happy where the growth is in the U.S., but relative to the market and our performance versus others, pleased that we're putting on share, pleased with the reaction to the newness and with the mix of newness that's coming. As we continue to get back into stock on the new core that she's reacting to and making those adjustments and the newness that we have planned. And I think a bit of the delta between the Canadian and the U.S. market consumer we see is we're not seeing the same discerning consumer in Canada as we are seeing in the U.S.

In terms of traffic as well as some other metrics that we monitor, we continue to monitor that, but the newness in both markets is responding very well. And the team is very focused on what the guest is reacting to. And bringing that to the consumer into the market in the back half.

Brooke Roach: Great. Thanks so much. I'll pass it on.

Operator: The next question is from Ike Boruchow with Wells Fargo. Please go ahead.

Ike Boruchow: Hey, thanks for taking my question. Two questions. I think first for Calvin. So appreciate on the product side, the commentary on what's working both in lifestyle and performance. But at the end of the day, the comps are up 1%. So clearly, there's got to be some things that are not working. Could you just maybe help us what exactly are the parts that are lagging that you're hoping to improve? And then Meghan, maybe just back to Matt's question, part of the guidance revision down is markdown, but it sounds like you're saying that you're not seeing any markdown yet, but you're planning it. So I guess maybe I'm just a little confused.

Is it because of the inventory build that you're expecting markdown to accelerate? I guess I'm just confused why you're taking a more cautious approach on that. Like what's the leading indicator that's making you think that if you're not seeing it yet?

Calvin McDonald: Thanks, Ike. In terms of the balance of the mix, I would say the overall traffic numbers are having an impact on the general mix of the assortment in the U.S. From a new guest perspective, we grew our new guests from, and I think, Meghan mentioned this from an AOV, UPT, both positive from a market share across all categories. We saw growth in our premium segment. I think where there continues to be opportunity is with our core and seasonal colors. We're seeing the guests shift to the truly new styles as I mentioned, the Glow Up, the Align No Line, the Daydrift, the Be Calm, and have opportunities.

But overall, it really is the macro discerning consumer that we're seeing through traffic in the store, the behavior, how they're shopping and reacting I think is definitely showing good indication. And as I alluded to the growth in market share is indicating we are gaining and winning to the marketplace and how the consumer is spending.

Meghan Frank: And I would add, Ike, similar on the markdown front. So the traffic trends, I would say, would be the leading indicator on why we've taken that positioning in terms of consumer confidence and macro uncertainty in the second half as well.

Ike Boruchow: Okay. Thank you.

Operator: The next question is from Paul Lejuez with Citi. Please go ahead.

Paul Lejuez: You maybe give a little bit more detail about inventory by geography? And if there are any specific regions that you're seeing potentially more margin pressure, markdown pressure, where is that coming from? Is that just the U.S. or is it more global? I mean is there anything in the competitive landscape front you see across your different global markets that make you think that things might heat up from a promotional perspective? Thanks.

Meghan Frank: Thanks, Paul. So in terms of inventory, I'd say again, we haven't seen markdown pressure to date, down 10 basis points year over year in Q1. But when we think about traffic trends and headwinds, they would be predominantly in the U.S. So I'd say that's where I'd probably place a little bit more of the as we move into the second half of the year in terms of what we've layered in terms of markdowns.

Calvin McDonald: And, from a competitive perspective, there's nothing we're seeing globally on a price promotional play other than in the U.S. Where I would say we continue to monitor that closely because we do see ongoing promotional activity across the market, across the competitors as we've seen certain consumer, the more cautious we know that to lever others pull and we continue to monitor it and quite frankly, anticipating a bit of a spike in the back half, if the macro headwinds continue. But we are a full-price business and we'll lead with innovation and our core assortment continue to play that. But we are seeing and do anticipate probably a dynamic competitive market in the U.S.

Paul Lejuez: Got it. Right. I just followed, have you adjusted purchases at all? You're just considering where your inventories are and the tariff situation maybe taking price up a little bit. Have you also taken your purchases and purchase assumptions down for the back half?

Meghan Frank: I would say we're always adjusting purchases and reflecting the current environment. We do benefit from about 40% of our purchases in core product. So that's an area we flex as we move forward. So I would say we always are doing that. We've done that to some degree. We'll continue to keep a close eye on inventory levels and sales trends.

Paul Lejuez: Thank you. Good luck.

Operator: The next question is from Alex Stratton with Morgan Stanley. Please go ahead.

Alex Stratton: Great. Thanks so much. Maybe for either of you, do newness levels stand in total? Like, are they back where you want them to be? And then if that's not inflecting Americas comp to positive, are you exploring maybe other potential drivers for what to do to get it there? And maybe related for Meghan on that one, is a positive comp for Americas possible this year? Or with your view on the macro, is that something that is more kicked out?

Calvin McDonald: Thanks, Alex. In terms of the composition of our merchandise mix, we are back at our newness percentages, historical newness percentages of the sum. I think the way the guest is reacting and responding within that newness, she is reacting very positively to the new core or intended core silhouette styles that she has not seen before, alluded to sort of Glow Up, the Align No Line, the Daydrift, Be Calm to name just a few, and there is a number of those. Those as a percentage of our newness mix, we are increasing in the back half so that we're reacting to what the guest is responding to.

And as a result, we are shifting some of the seasonal colors, patterns, and graphics in the remaining core to maintain that sort of ratio that we're seeing. But as I look to the back half, the percentage of newness remains strong above historical as we lean into a little bit of these areas where the guest has really responded well. And we weren't at full store distribution. We sold out of many of these styles and silhouettes and have very strong rating reviews on them. So I'm pleased with the newness mix and the work the team has done.

And what we have seen is the consumer respond very well to the completely new styles that she hasn't seen before, and that's sort of the mix that you will see us continue to do heading into the back half of this year.

Meghan Frank: And Alex, I'd add, we're not guiding specifically to comps for the year. But our view on the full year revenue for The Americas hasn't changed. So low single digit to mid-single digit and feel we're well positioned to capitalize if the consumer environment improves as well. That's what we're offering today.

Alex Stratton: Thanks a lot. Good luck.

Operator: The next question is from Jay Sole with UBS. Please go ahead.

Jay Sole: Great. Thank you so much. My question is about China. Given the comp in China, you've opened a lot of stores. How much more store growth opportunity do you see in China before you start worrying about cannibalizing your existing store base given the level of comp right here? Like can you tell us how many stores you have now, what you expect by the end of the year? And then maybe kind of what you're thinking about as a store growth rate going forward? Thank you.

Meghan Frank: Yes. So in terms of China, I would say still feel we're early in our journey there. So we've got 154 stores today. We had a goal of approximately 200 in our current Power of Three times Two plan and saw growth beyond that. I'm really pleased with the performance on new stores. And I'd also mention we are early in terms of our co-located strategy, so where we have stores with high traffic, high sales per square foot, and see an opportunity to expand the size of stores to have a more holistic assortment across men's, women's, accessories, capitalize on that traffic.

We're underway in that strategy in North America to a larger degree, and it's largely still in front of us in terms of China.

Jay Sole: Got it. And can you talk about what the traffic trends were in China? Maybe you talked about what the trends were in the U.S.?

Meghan Frank: We don't break out specifically on traffic trends, but I would say still seeing strong double-digit growth in terms of the China market and nothing notable there.

Jay Sole: Got it. Thank you so much.

Operator: The next question is from Adrian Yin with Barclays. Please go ahead.

Adrian Yin: Thank you very much. My question is on the inventory. The inventory does have some tariff impact and FX. Of the delta from units to dollars at about 7%, how much of that is tariff and how much of that would be the FX? And then secondarily, I guess it's a follow-on. You expecting that tariff inventory to sort of hit the P&L sort of late June and July? And is that when we should expect the commensurate price impact? Thank you.

Meghan Frank: Hey, Adrian. So in terms of the impact on dollar inventory, so it is predominantly driven by higher AUCs related to tariffs and then FX, I would say, we haven't broken out the details, but not too far off from each other in terms of relativity. And then in terms of the impact on tariffs, we do have, as I mentioned, a more pronounced impact in Q2 in terms of the P&L. So 60 basis points in Q2 because the mitigation actions come in the second half. The second half of the year or sorry, for the full year, the FX, sorry, the tariff headwind is 40 basis points.

With the mitigation actions coming into play towards the second half of the year. I would say in terms of pricing, those actions will start rolling out towards the second half of this quarter and into Q3.

Adrian Yin: Okay, great. And then my other question is on the lower product costs, what is driving that? Was it freight or cost engineering? And do you assume that will neutralize as we go into the back half of the year? Thanks.

Meghan Frank: Yes. So in terms of product cost, it would be predominantly driven by mix of business relative to expectations. So I would say right now what's reflected in our guide reflects our forecast in terms of mix of business in the second half of the year, and I wouldn't call out product costs as a variance driver for the full year at this point in time.

Adrian Yin: Okay, great. Thanks so much. Best of luck.

Operator: The next question is from Lorraine Hutchinson with Bank of America. Please go ahead.

Lorraine Hutchinson: Thank you. Good afternoon. I wanted to focus on SG&A for a minute. It looks quite high in the second quarter. Is there anything changing in your view of the investment needed to drive growth? Or is this just timing versus planned investments in the second half?

Meghan Frank: Thanks, Lorraine. Yeah. So in terms of Q2, so there are a few factors that are impacting Q2. So I think important to zoom out to the full year. So for the full year, we did guide revenue in line with last time, so $11.15 billion to $11.3 billion. And the operating margin relative to last time is about up 60 basis points driven by just tariffs and markdown changes. So when you look at Q2 specifically, first I'd note that we did expand our operating margin last year by 110 basis points. It was higher than our full year expansion, which was 50. So therefore, we had assumed some pressure in our operating margin as we planned the year.

Then if you look specifically at the year-over-year SG&A, that would be driven by increased foundational investments and depreciation, strategic investments. And then those add backs that we discussed last quarter in terms of expenses, for example, store labor. That we added back from a normalized perspective. Relative to the full year, 170 to 190 basis points deleverage in Q2. And 50 basis points for the full year.

Lorraine Hutchinson: Thank you.

Operator: The next question is from Aneesha Sherman with Bernstein. Please go ahead.

Aneesha Sherman: Thank you. I want to go back to China. Meghan, you talked about your store growth there, but wondering if you can share some color around the comp growth. There's been a pretty sizable deceleration year over year. Can you share some color around what's that's being driven by? Is it a macro slowdown or something else? And I know there were some tough compares last Q1 as those compares ease in China as well as in the rest of the world. Do you expect to see an acceleration in the comp in the next couple of quarters?

Meghan Frank: Yes. So in terms of China, we did see a slowdown both in trend and comp. We did have a four-point impact from the timing of Chinese New Year. We did also have an outsized performance, I would say, in terms of non-comp new store openings as well as the smaller portion that we do have co-located strategy there. We had an outperformance in terms of revenue growth last year. Even if looking at Q4 to Q1, we were at 39% growth in Q4, so well above expectations. So I would say still pleased with China trends, still strong double-digit growth, and do still have the same expectation for the full year of 25% to 30% growth rate for China.

Aneesha Sherman: And if I can just follow-up, is China still your best full-price market globally?

Meghan Frank: It's still our lowest markdown, yes, so highest full price.

Aneesha Sherman: Thank you.

Operator: The next question is from John Kernan. Oh, pardon me.

Howard Tubin: All right. We'll just take one more question. Thanks.

Operator: Thank you. The final question is from John Kernan with TD Cowen. Please go ahead.

John Kernan: All right. Thanks for squeezing me in, Howard. Just to stay on China and rest of world, obviously, you just talked about it in relation to Aneesha's question, but there was a sizable deceleration in the two-year stack if that's the best way to look at it. But do you think you're becoming more susceptible to a macro environment in China now that you're pushing the end of the year, be pushing $1.7 billion in revenue? And what are you seeing in Rest of World? There was a deceleration there as well. Thank you.

Calvin McDonald: Thanks, John. In terms of our view of our opportunities, nothing has changed. When I look at our performance in the quarter, and our guide for the year, across Mainland China, our Rest of World, and we look at our EMEA, and APAC markets, they continue to perform incredibly strong, double-digit momentum. We're early relative to market share, early relative to unaided brand awareness, continue to see very healthy new guest acquisition and matriculation with our existing guests. And the way the guest is responding to both our newness as well as our long lineup of core items. So nothing has changed from our vantage point.

I think as Meghan indicated, in some of the markets we had outsized growth last year, but very, very healthy strong numbers and relative to peer sets and with our market share gains, very excited and see a long runway of growth and opportunity. As I've alluded before, ended last year at 25% of our business being international and have opportunity we think for a fifty-fifty ratio into the future. So definitely Lululemon is a global brand underdeveloped in these markets and seeing great momentum, a very strong growth and anticipate that to continue.

John Kernan: Megan, did you give the markdown impact embedded in the gross margin guidance on a basis point level?

Meghan Frank: It did. For the full year, to 20 basis points up to last year.

John Kernan: Got it. Thank you.

Operator: That's all the time we have for questions today. Thank you for joining and have a nice day.

Where to invest $1,000 right now

When our analyst team has a stock tip, it can pay to listen. After all, Stock Advisor’s total average return is 789%* — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 172% for the S&P 500.

They just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy right now, available when you join Stock Advisor.

See the stocks »

*Stock Advisor returns as of June 2, 2025

This article is a transcript of this conference call produced for The Motley Fool. While we strive for our Foolish Best, there may be errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in this transcript. Parts of this article were created using Large Language Models (LLMs) based on The Motley Fool's insights and investing approach. It has been reviewed by our AI quality control systems. Since LLMs cannot (currently) own stocks, it has no positions in any of the stocks mentioned. As with all our articles, The Motley Fool does not assume any responsibility for your use of this content, and we strongly encourage you to do your own research, including listening to the call yourself and reading the company's SEC filings. Please see our Terms and Conditions for additional details, including our Obligatory Capitalized Disclaimers of Liability.

The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Lululemon Athletica Inc. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

❌