Key Points

• SCHD and GCOW focus on higher-yielding dividend stocks.

• The ETFs have different strategies for selecting those stocks.

• They also have different fees and return profiles.

Many exchange-traded funds (ETFs) focus on holding dividend-paying stocks. While that gives income-seeking investors lots of options, it can make it difficult to know which is the best one to buy.

The Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (NYSEMKT: SCHD) and Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (NYSEMKT: GCOW) are two notable dividend ETFs. Here's a look at which is the better one to buy for those seeking to generate passive income.

Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now. Learn More »

Image source: Getty Images.

Different strategies for selecting high-yielding dividend stocks

The Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF and the Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF aim to provide their investors with above-average dividend income by holding higher-yielding dividend stocks. The ETFs each hold roughly 100 dividend stocks. However, they use different strategies to select their holdings.

The Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF aims to track the returns of the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. That index screens U.S. dividend stocks based on four quality characteristics:

• Cash flow to debt.
• Return on equity (ROE).
• Indicated dividend yield.
• Five-year dividend growth rate.

The index selects companies that have stronger financial profiles than their peers. That should enable them to deliver sustainable and growing dividends, and the Schwab U.S. Dividend ETF accordingly provides investors with a higher-yielding current dividend that should grow at an above-average rate. At its annual reconstitution, its 100 holdings had an average dividend yield of 3.8% and a five-year dividend growth rate of 8.4%.

The Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF uses a different strategy for selecting its 100 high-yielding dividend stocks. It starts by screening the 1,000 stocks in the FTSE Developed Large-Cap Index for the 300 companies with the highest free cash flow yield over the past 12 months. It screens those stocks for the 100 highest dividend yields. It then weights those 100 companies in the fund from highest yield to lowest, capping its top holding at 2%. At its last rebalance, which it does twice a year, its 100 holdings had an average free cash flow yield of 6.3% and a dividend yield of 5%.

Here's a look at how the top holdings of these ETFs currently compare:

Data sources: Schwab and Pacer.

Given their different strategies for selecting dividend stocks, the funds have very different holdings. SCHD holds only companies with headquarters in the U.S., while GCOW takes a global approach. U.S. stocks make up less than 25% of its holdings. Meanwhile, SCHD weights its holdings based on their dividend quality, while GCOW weights them based on dividend yield. Given its focus on yield, GCOW offers investors a higher current income yield at 4.2%, compared with 3.9% for SCHD.

Costs and returns

While SCHD and GCOW focus on higher-yielding dividend stocks, their strategies in selecting holdings have a major impact beyond the current dividend income. Because SCHD is a passively managed ETF while GCOW is an actively managed fund, SCHD has a much lower ETF expense ratio than GCOW. SCHD's is just 0.06%, compared with GCOW's 0.6%. Put another way, every $10,000 invested would incur $60 in management fees each year if invested in GCOW, compared with only $6 in SCHD.

GCOW's higher fee really eats into the income the fund generates, which affects its returns over the long term. The fund's current holdings actually have a 4.7% dividend yield, whereas the fund's latest payout had only a 4.2% implied yield.

Data sources: Pacer and Schwab. Note: GCOW's inception date is 2/22/16, while SCHD's is 10/20/11.

GCOW has outperformed SCHD over the past five years. However, SCHD has delivered better performance over the longer term. That's due to its lower costs and focus on companies that grow their dividends, which tend to produce the highest total returns over the long term.

SCHD is a better ETF for passive income

SCHD and GCOW hold higher-yielding dividend stocks, making either ETF ideal for those seeking passive income. However, SCHD stands out as the better one to buy because of its focus on dividend sustainability and growth. It also has a much lower ETF expense ratio. So it should provide investors with an attractive and growing stream of passive dividend income.

Should you invest $1,000 in Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF right now?

Before you buy stock in Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF, consider this:

The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.

Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $692,914!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $963,866!*

Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 1,050% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 179% for the S&P 500. Don’t miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor.

See the 10 stocks »

*Stock Advisor returns as of June 30, 2025

Matt DiLallo has positions in Chevron, Coca-Cola, ConocoPhillips, Gilead Sciences, Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF, and Verizon Communications. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Amgen, Chevron, Cisco Systems, Gilead Sciences, and Texas Instruments. The Motley Fool recommends BP, British American Tobacco, Equinor Asa, Lockheed Martin, Nestlé, Philip Morris International, and Verizon Communications and recommends the following options: long January 2026 $40 calls on British American Tobacco and short January 2026 $40 puts on British American Tobacco. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

The energy sector can be a great place for investors to collect a lucrative passive income stream. Many energy companies generate lots of excess cash flow, giving them the money to pay hefty dividends. Several companies in the sector also have long dividend growth streaks.

TotalEnergies (NYSE: TTE), Chevron (NYSE: CVX), and Brookfield Renewable (NYSE: BEPC)(NYSE: BEP) stand out to a few Fool.com contributors as excellent energy stocks to buy for passive income. They pay high-yielding and steadily rising dividends. Here's a look at why they could deliver years of passive income.

Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now. Continue »

TotalEnergies is acting now so it can thrive through the transition

Reuben Gregg Brewer (TotalEnergies): For most investors, the best way to invest in the energy sector will be to buy an integrated energy company. That's because these businesses have exposure to the entire industry, from the upstream (drilling) through the midstream (pipelines) and into the downstream (chemical and refining). This diversification helps to soften the peaks and valleys of an industry that is known for being volatile. But all of the major integrated energy companies are a little different, with TotalEnergies standing out in a very important way.

In 2020, European peers BP and Shell cut their dividends as they announced plans to increase investment in clean energy assets. TotalEnergies made the same commitment but maintained its dividend. Since that point, both BP and Shell have walked back their clean energy plans. TotalEnergies has increased the pace of its investment in electricity and even created a new division so investors could more easily monitor its progress. The new integrated power division grew operating income 17% in 2024.

Simply put, TotalEnergies is a well run oil and gas company and, increasingly, a well-run clean energy company, too. If you want years of passive income, the French energy giant is positioning itself to not just weather the clean energy transition but also to thrive as the world increases its use of non-carbon fuels. And you can collect a dividend yield of 6%, higher than all but one of its closest peers, if you buy it today. (Note that U.S. investors have to pay French taxes on the dividends they receive, a portion of which can be claimed back when filing U.S. taxes.)

Stress-tested to thrive on lower oil prices

Matt DiLallo (Chevron): Chevron's dividend yield is approaching 5%. That's due to a nearly 20% decline in the oil company's stock price from its recent peak. Shares of the oil giant have sold off because of lower crude prices this year. The price of Brent crude, the global oil benchmark, has fallen more than 10% to around $65 a barrel because of fears that tariffs could slow economic growth and reduce oil demand.

While lower oil prices will have an impact on Chevron's cash flow, they won't affect its ability to continue increasing its high-yielding dividend. The oil giant has stress-tested its business for a downside scenario where Brent averages just $50 a barrel from 2025 through 2027. Under that scenario, Chevron would produce enough cash to cover its investment program and pay a growing dividend with room to spare. Meanwhile, it would have the capacity to buy back shares at the low end of its $10 billion to $20 billion annual target range thanks to its strong balance sheet.

Chevron is on pace to add $9 billion to $10 billion to its annual free cash flow by 2026 in an environment where Brent is in the $60- to $70-a-barrel range. That would enable the company to buy back shares toward the upper end of its target range at the current price point. On top of that, there's additional upside if the company closes its needle-moving acquisition of Hess, which would more than double its free cash flow by 2027 at $70 oil.

Chevron's low-cost production, visible upside catalysts, and strong balance sheet put it in an excellent position to continue increasing its dividend, which it has done for 38 straight years. The oil company has grown its payout faster than the S&P 500 and its closest peer over the past five years. These factors suggest that an investment in Chevron will create a lot of passive income over the years to come.

Riding the renewable energy boom to reward investors

Neha Chamaria (Brookfield Renewable): Brookfield Renewable is one of the largest publicly traded renewable energy companies in the world with a massive portfolio spanning hydropower, wind, solar, and distributed energy and storage. The company also has a large global footprint and is embarking on a big growth journey that should drive its cash flows and dividends higher in the coming years.

To put some numbers to that, Brookfield Renewable is planning to invest $8 billion to $9 billion over the next five years and expects to grow its funds from operations (FFO) per unit by over 10% annually in the long term. That's not an overly ambitious goal if you think it is, simply because almost 6% growth could already be embedded in the company's development pipeline and inflation escalation clauses in its long-term contracts. For those in the know, Brookfield Renewable sells electricity under long-term contracts, and almost 90% of its cash flows are contracted for an average of 14 years.

That also makes Brookfield Renewable's cash flows highly stable and predictable, which is why management has been able to set a goal of increasing its dividend annually by 5% to 9% in the long term. Even a 5% annual dividend growth could create years of passive income for investors if they reinvest the dividends. Investors who own the corporate shares of Brookfield Renewable also get to enjoy a high 5%-plus dividend yield now.

Should you invest $1,000 in Chevron right now?

Before you buy stock in Chevron, consider this:

The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Chevron wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.

Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $594,046!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $680,390!*

Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 872% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 160% for the S&P 500. Don’t miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor.

See the 10 stocks »

*Stock Advisor returns as of April 28, 2025

Matt DiLallo has positions in Brookfield Renewable, Brookfield Renewable Partners, and Chevron. Neha Chamaria has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. Reuben Gregg Brewer has positions in Brookfield Renewable Partners and TotalEnergies. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Chevron. The Motley Fool recommends BP, Brookfield Renewable, and Brookfield Renewable Partners. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.