Reading view

What CFOs worry about most in uncertain markets

Good morning. In a year defined by uncertainty, CFOs must stay agile and make proactive decisions to navigate a financial landscape where market sentiment can “flip on a dime”.

That was the focus of an interesting conversation I had with Amol Dhargalkar, chairman and managing partner of Chatham Financial, a global financial risk management advisory and technology firm. Dhargalkar shared insights from his discussions with CFOs, highlighting three major issues.

Financing now, not later

“If there’s one big theme I can point to, it’s that when there is an opportunity for financing, CFOs are taking advantage of it,” Dhargalkar said.

He explained that this bias toward immediate action is less about the U.S. Federal Reserve’s moves on interest rates and more about market sentiment, which can shift rapidly due to geopolitical or policy changes. Many CFOs prefer to secure deals now rather than risk adverse developments, such as new tariffs, that could negatively affect their businesses.

Recent data shows a significant amount of issuance in the first half of the year, reflecting this proactive approach, Dhargalkar noted. Even if interest rates might decline modestly in the coming months, the risk of waiting often outweighs the potential benefit for many finance leaders.

Navigating volatile bond yields

“We’ve seen a lot of volatility in government bond yields, which has played into the market in a variety of ways,” Dhargalkar explained. CFOs are closely monitoring these fluctuations, though uncertainty about future movements remains high. While this doesn’t mean investors are abandoning U.S. markets, it is a key area of concern for finance leaders.

Concerns about the potential impact of President Trump’s tax bill rattled bond markets last month, primarily due to fears it would sharply increase the U.S. national debt, Fortune reported.

The dollar’s impact and currency risk

The strength—or weakness—of the U.S. dollar is also top of mind, especially for multinational companies, Dhargalkar said. Many CFOs are asking whether the recent dollar weakness is temporary or a longer-term trend, and how they should manage related currency risks. This environment has prompted some companies to implement or expand foreign exchange hedging programs, particularly those that previously had limited exposure, he explained.

Managing currency risk is more challenging for smaller multinationals, which are less likely to have robust hedging programs in place, Dhargalkar said. For companies with significant overseas earnings, a weaker dollar can be a net positive, as foreign revenues translate into more dollars, he explained. However, the rapid movement of the dollar in either direction typically sparks extensive internal discussions about hedging strategies and financial forecasts.

When I asked Dhargalkar his biggest piece of advice for CFOs, he said: “Rethink their approach to capital structure and financing tools.” As companies move beyond “firefighting mode,” they should consider diversifying their issuance base—such as issuing debt abroad or exploring private credit markets—rather than relying solely on traditional U.S. financing options, he suggested.

Today’s financing tools are more flexible, though often more expensive due to higher rates compared to several years ago. “Don’t feel like you’re stuck with the tools of yesterday,” Dhargalkar said.

Sheryl Estrada
[email protected]

This story was originally featured on Fortune.com

© Getty Images

CFOs must stay agile and make proactive decisions to navigate a financial landscape where market sentiment can "flip on a dime".
  •  

Corporate CFOs are warming up to blockchain

Good morning. Is the segment of crypto-friendly CFOs growing? That appears to be the case, as pursuing blockchain initiatives is becoming increasingly common.

Fortune’s Catherine McGrath reported last week that about 60% of Fortune 500 executives say their companies are “working on blockchain initiatives,” according to a new survey published by crypto exchange Coinbase in partnership with GLG Research. This is a 4% increase from last year.

The report also highlighted that 81% of crypto-aware, small- and medium-sized businesses are interested in using stablecoins to address their biggest financial pain points. That belief is catching on at large companies, with more than three times as many Fortune 500 executives now exploring stablecoins compared to last year, according to Coinbase.

Fortune’s Leo Schwartz and Ben Weiss exclusively reported that Meta is in discussions with crypto firms to introduce stablecoins as a means to manage payouts, and has also hired a VP of product with crypto experience to help shepherd the discussions. Amazon and Walmart are also looking into issuing their own stablecoins, the Wall Street Journal reports.

Shifting political dynamics have sparked renewed interest in blockchain among mainstream U.S. corporations. The Trump administration has advocated for a clear regulatory framework for crypto in support of the industry.

The crypto industry also is currently experiencing a surge in IPO activity. Circle, a leading issuer of the USDC stablecoin pegged to the U.S. dollar, went public this month with a valuation of $8 billion. Several other crypto companies also have filed for IPOs or are reportedly exploring the possibility.

Are legacy financial institutions at large prepared for crypto? Jenny Johnson, CEO of Franklin Templeton, doesn’t think so. Johnson helms a nearly 80-year-old, publicly traded financial institution. She writes in a Fortune opinion piece that financial institutions have attempted to integrate digital asset technology for more than 10 years “with little to show for their efforts,” as the total value of blockchain-based finance comprises less than 1% of the $300 trillion global system.

“We believe that the portfolios of the future will increasingly move away from today’s account-based system and rely instead on digital wallets that can hold a limitless number of tokenized assets in a single place—all of which can be transferred instantly, as well as lent out or staked for additional yield,” Johnson writes. She adds, “The advantages of blockchain are so compelling that we don’t foresee the shift to digital-asset technology being slow or incremental. Indeed, we expect our industry will evolve more in the next five years than in the last 50.”

Sheryl Estrada
[email protected]

This story was originally featured on Fortune.com

© Getty Images

Stablecoins are on the horizon.
  •  

Free breakfast is disappearing at popular hotel brands

Have you ever planned part of a vacation stay around a free breakfast? Whether it’s sitting down for eggs and waffles or having a coffee and banana to go, complimentary morning meals are a key factor for many travelers when choosing a hotel. Unfortunately, as we head into the summer travel season, some popular hotel brands are reconsidering this popular perk.

Take, for instance, Hyatt Place—one of Hyatt’s largest select-service brands—which has long been known for offering complimentary breakfast. But that’s changing at more than 40 U.S. properties, where a pilot program launched in November has removed free breakfast for all guests. The website now states, “Free breakfast at most hotels.” Instead, these hotels offer rate options: some include breakfast, others do not, and guests can pay separately if they wish. Hyatt Globalist members still receive the free breakfast benefit. Hyatt did not respond to Fortune’s request for comment on whether the pilot program has expanded.

Industry analysts have confirmed that a number of hotels are moving to limit or eliminate what guests can munch on in the morning.

“We are aware that some brands have been testing room rate structures inclusive or exclusive of breakfast, grab-and-go options, or programs where complimentary breakfasts are only offered to loyalty members,” Rachael Rothman, head of hotels research and data analytics at CBRE Group, told Fortune.

According to Zach Demuth, global head of hotels research at JLL, Hyatt Place targets value-driven, price-sensitive guests—often longer-stay travelers who prefer larger rooms in secondary markets. At the pilot hotels, guests who opt out of breakfast get discounts or extra loyalty points. Demuth noted, “That consumer is heavily driven by value, specifically price value.” He added it’s too early to judge the program’s success, but Hyatt and others believe replacing free breakfast with alternative benefits could boost demand.

St. Regis Macao, part of the Marriott Bonvoy portfolio, is also testing changes. As of March 1, complimentary breakfast was eliminated for Marriott Bonvoy Platinum, Titanium, and Ambassador members at this property. Instead, eligible guests receive bonus points or a local amenity, and Platinum status and above members receive a breakfast discount. On the dining page of the hotel’s website, under “Frequently Asked Questions,” it now states: “Complimentary breakfast is not currently served at The St. Regis Macao.” A Marriott representative told Fortune this is a property-specific test, not a broader brand policy.

Demuth said luxury travelers often don’t value free breakfast as much as other perks. “For luxury brands, giving top-tier loyalty members free breakfast really doesn’t do anything for that member. Basically, they could care less,” he said.

Why breakfast still matters

Despite these pilots, Rothman emphasized that major global hotel brands are not eliminating complimentary breakfast across the board. “Breakfast is a cost [for hotel brands], without a doubt, but it can also be a key differentiator and can create value through higher rates and higher occupancy levels,” she said.

CBRE research shows that hotels offering complimentary breakfast outperform those that don’t, with revenue per available room (RevPAR) growth more than doubling that of brands without the amenity since 2013. (The data is based on the public filings of Choice, Hilton, Hyatt, IHG Hotels & Resorts, Marriott, and Wyndham.) This may explain the outperformance of upper-midscale brands, which are more likely to offer breakfast, according to the report.

So why are some brands testing the removal of free breakfast? Demuth explained that many guests prefer to explore local dining rather than eat at the hotel, making complimentary meals less of a draw and more of a cost. “The reality is that, sure, breakfast at a hotel is great, but that doesn’t necessarily allow you to experience the destination,” he said.

For now, complimentary breakfast remains a staple at most major hotel brands, but shifting guest preferences and rising costs are prompting some properties to experiment with new models. Whether these changes catch on more broadly remains to be seen. But for many travelers, that early-morning hotel breakfast is still part of the journey.

This story was originally featured on Fortune.com

© Getty Images

Experts explain why this popular perk is being reconsidered.
  •