Normal view

Received yesterday — 12 June 2025

Bad news for college grads: These 3 economic factors are creating a dismal jobs market for entry-level workers 

12 June 2025 at 11:00

A new class of young graduates is getting ready to enter the workforce this summer, but they’re likely to face a chilly reception.   

In one social media post after another, entry-level workers are bemoaning the state of the labor market and how hard it is to find a job. “It feels more likely to win the lottery right now than get a job,” said one young TikTok poster. “This is not what I expected,” said another young woman on Instagram as she held a stack of resumes and wiped tears from her eyes. “But I can’t be delusional anymore, I literally need to make money.”

The current labor market appears strong on the surface—unemployment is still low at 4.2%, wage growth is steady, and the U.S. added 139,000 jobs in May. But those numbers don’t tell the whole story. A deeper look beneath the surface reveals a much different jobs market for entry-level workers. The unemployment rate for recent college graduates aged 22-27 was 5.8% as of March, according to research from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. And a May report from Oxford Economics found that 85% of unemployment since the middle of 2023 could be attributed to people just entering the workforce. 

“Top-line job openings and unemployment statistics aren’t, in practice, reflecting the experience of new grads entering the workforce,” Mischa Fisher, an economist at Udemy, a provider of online training courses, tells Fortune. “Because entry-level roles are in short supply.” 

It’s no surprise, then, that employee confidence amongst entry-level workers just hit an all-time low, according to a recent report from Glassdoor. And more than half (56%) of this year’s college graduates feel pessimistic about starting their careers in the current economy, according to another survey from jobs platform Handshake. 

A few different factors are likely contributing to such a tough job market for young people right now. Experts tell Fortune that a combination of factors including a cooling labor market, a hiring pullback prompted by shifting tariff policies, and the long-promised of integration of AI into the workforce, are all creating massive problems for a new generation of job seekers. 

“There are now clear trends in the data, not just vague whisperings, that more and more people are getting left behind,” says Cory Stahle, an economist at hiring platform Indeed’s Hiring Lab.

The ‘lock-in’ effect

The COVID pandemic kicked off a major workforce reshuffling, unofficially dubbed the “Great Resignation,” during which workers were successfully able to switch jobs for higher wages. 

But that era is long gone. The labor market has become more stagnant, and quit rates fell from 3% in March of 2022, the highest in over two decades, to around 2% as of April 2025, according to data from the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. Workers who switch roles are also less likely to make more money if they do so. People who stay in their jobs are seeing an average of 4.4% wage growth, while those who leave are getting just 4.3% more, according to data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. 

That lack of turnover means that there are fewer opportunities for entry level workers to nab a role. “We’re seeing the labor market’s version of the housing market’s ‘lock-in’ effect, where employees are too nervous to make moves,” says Fisher. “This freeze is blocking normal opportunity flow, so early career workers can’t break in, experienced workers can’t move up, and burned-out employees are staying put.”

Tariff uncertainty

Trump’s tariff policy changes, and their subsequent impact on the economy, is also creating problems for entry-level workers in the labor market. 

With an uncertain economic outlook thanks to on-again-off-again levies for major U.S. trading partners, many companies have pulled back on hiring until they get further clarity on what kind of economy will take shape in 2025. 

Around 30% of small and mid-size business owners say tariffs are directly impacting their organizations in a negative way, and 42% say they plan to pull back on hiring as a result, according to a May survey from coaching and advisory firm Vistage, in partnership with the Wall Street Journal

“Business leaders are uncertain and when that happens they don’t do as much hiring because they don’t know what the next week is going to look like, let alone the next month,” says Allison Shrivastava, a labor economist also at Indeed’s Hiring Lab. “They’re going to wait, especially for those jobs in what we think of as, traditionally, white collar sectors, which are often difficult and costly to hire for.”

The new AI reality 

The promise of AI has been a looming threat to human workers for years, but there are now signs that companies are using the new tech to take over work previously done by entry-level employees. 

Many of the tasks that used to serve as a training ground for junior employees, like data entry, research, and handling basic customer or employee requests, are already being delegated to AI. Technical fields like computer science and finance are getting hit especially hard. While employment for people older than 27 in computer science and mathematical occupations has grown a modest 0.8% since 2022, employment for those aged 22-27, or recent graduates, has declined by 8%, according to a May report from labor market research firm Oxford Economics. That’s compared to college graduates in all other occupations, who saw 2% employment gains.

“We concluded that a high adoption rate by information companies along with the sheer employment declines in these roles since 2022 suggested some displacement effect from AI,” the report reads.

LinkedIn’s chief economic opportunity officer Aneesh Raman, echoed that thought in a recent New York Times op-ed. “In tech, advanced coding tools are creeping into the tasks of writing simple code and debugging—the ways junior developers gain experience,” he wrote.

Companies are under pressure from investors to show that they can do more with less because of AI, says Sam Kuhn, an economist at Appcast, a job advertising company. Cutting jobs, or freezing hiring, are ways to do that. “We are starting to see the ripple effects of companies that have invested a lot of money into artificial intelligence, wanting to show that they’re actually getting something out of it,” he says. 

Meta reportedly plans to use AI to review the platform’s privacy and societal risks instead of human staffers. At Microsoft, CEO Satya Nadella said in April that around 30% of code is now written by AI, a reality that likely factored into recent layoffs. And the CEO of payments platform Klarna has openly admitted last month that AI helped the company cut its workforce by around 40%. AI company founders are also getting more candid; Dario Amondei, the CEO of leading AI company Anthropic, has said outright that the technology could wipe out roughly 50% of all entry-level white-collar jobs. 

“It sounds crazy, and people just don’t believe it,” he said. “We, as the producers of this technology, have a duty and an obligation to be honest about what is coming.”

What’s a new grad to do? 

New job seekers can comfort themselves with the knowledge that it’s not just their imagination—the hiring landscape really is tougher for them than it was a few years ago. 

That means they need to be more resourceful than their predecessors when it comes to outsmarting the labor market. That might include things like pivoting their job search to consider other industries or roles outside of what they studied in school. They also need to work harder to show employers that the skills they learned in college are a perfect fit for a given role.   

“In the current labor market, new graduates need to find additional signals of skill beyond just a degree,” says Fisher. “From certificates to demonstrated soft skills like communication, the candidates who stand out show they’re already bridging the gap between school and skills acquisition.” 

Because the hiring process skews towards Zoom interviews and AI-driven recruiting, young people also need to take the initiative and reach out to hiring managers on their own, whether that’s on LinkedIn, at a local job fair, or tapping into an alumni network. “There are fewer opportunities now to engage on a human level with employers up front,” says Steve Rakas, executive director of the Masters Career Center at Carnegie Mellon’s Tepper School of Business. 

There remains, however, a reason for young people to hold out hope. Labor market trends are cyclical, and there are still opportunities out there for young people who want them, notes Rakas—even if they’re not ideal.

“We’re coaching them to think about not just plan A, but also plan B, C and D,” he says.
“To be pragmatic, and also to pivot.” 

This story was originally featured on Fortune.com

A young college grad greeting a hostile job market.
Received before yesterday

83% of C-suite leaders with DEI policies say maintaining or expanding them is essential to mitigating legal risk

11 June 2025 at 12:40

Good morning!

The Trump administration has been using different methods over the past few months to push private sector companies to change or abandon their DEI programs. And while business leaders have certainly felt a sense of fear about standing up for those programs, they say abandoning such practices could also open them up to legal risk

The vast majority (83%) of C-suite leaders say maintaining or expanding DEI is essential to mitigating legal risk, according to a survey of 1,000 executives with active workplace inclusion programs in place, published jointly by the Catalyst, a nonprofit focused on women’s advancement and inclusion, and the NYU School of Law’s Meltzer Center for Diversity, Inclusion, and Belonging. Another 68% of business leaders say that moving away from their DEI policies would actually impose more risk for their companies. That’s because most C-suite leaders say scaling back on these policies could make their organizations more vulnerable to discrimination claims from minority groups, including women, people of color, LGBTQIA+ employees. 

“Opting out of DEI is not a neutral act—it’s a choice with consequences,” says Christina Joseph, project director of the Advancing DEI Initiative at the Meltzer Center. “That’s because these programs help root out harmful policies that especially affect marginalized groups. This report reminds us that without those safeguards, organizations face more, not less, legal exposure.”

While it’s clear that business leaders are aware of the danger of doing away with their DEI programs, their legal counsel is even more mindful. Around 88% of legal leaders say that keeping corporate DEI practices in place is essential to avoiding legal risk, and 65% saying that moving away from those programs could lead to additional risk, according to the report, which also surveyed 250 legal leaders. 

“Over the past couple of years, many organizational leaders have been focused on the legal risks of standing firm on diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives,” Kenji Yoshino, Chief Justice Earl Warren Professor of Constitutional Law at NYU School of Law and Director of the Meltzer Center, wrote in a statement accompanying the report. “This survey is a critical reminder of the substantial legal risks in the other direction.”

Brit Morse
[email protected]

Introducing Fortune AIQ

AI is reshaping work. What does it mean for your team? Fortune has unveiled a new hub, Fortune AIQ, dedicated to navigating AI’s real-world impact. Fortune has interviewed and surveyed the companies at the front lines of the AI revolution. In the coming months, we’ll roll out playbooks based on their learnings to help you get the most out of AI—and turn AI into AIQ. The first AIQ playbook, The “people” aspect of AI, explores various aspects of how mastering the “human” element of an AI deployment is just as important as the technical details.

    • Companies are overhauling their hiring processes to screen candidates for AI skills—and attitudes. Read more
    • AI is changing how employees train—and starting to reduce how much training they need. Read more
    • Everyone’s using AI at work. Here’s how companies can keep data safe. Read more

This story was originally featured on Fortune.com

© Getty Images

Keeping policies in place may put businesses at risk, but abandoning them altogether also has consequences.

Employee confidence amongst entry-level workers just hit an all-time low

10 June 2025 at 12:48

Good morning!

Workers are feeling the burden of economic uncertainty, and it’s leading them to become increasingly less hopeful about their jobs—especially if they’re just starting out. 

The share of employees overall who reported having a positive six month outlook fell to 44.1% in May, down from 45.8% the previous month, according to new data from job platform Glassdoor’s Employee Confidence Index. That’s an all-time low since the index first started tracking the metric in 2016. The downward trend is largely being driven by entry-level employees; the share of confident employees within that cohort dropped from 44.1% to 43.4%. By comparison, the portion of confident mid- and director-level employees increased by 0.2% and .06% over the same time period.  

“Entry level workers are feeling the brunt of a low-hiring job market and are finding it hard to get onto the career ladder at all, which is both a challenge and also very different from the experience just a few years ago,” says Daniel Zhao, lead economist at Glassdoor. 

The confidence dip for entry-level workers is largely due to economic uncertainty, according to Zhao. Mentions of layoffs were up 9% on Glassdoor over the last month, and have increased 18% over the past 12 months. Discussions of macroeconomic impacts also jumped 17% in May compared to the month before, signaling that these topics are weighing heavy on anxious employees. 

“There has been this steady rise in layoffs, which combined with a low hiring environment and the lack of a reset period for workers, is causing this kind of cumulative stacking effect where [it’s] just bad news after bad news and it’s really taking its toll on workers,” says Zhao. 

Employee confidence in government and public administration remains the lowest of any industry, thanks to widespread staffing cuts from the Trump administration and Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency. Only 34.5% of employees in that sector reported a positive six-month outlook in May. By comparison, that number was 49% in November of last year.  

Whether or not employees change their perspectives on the future will largely depend on how the labor market shapes up throughout the rest of the year, and whether or not companies start hiring again. However, if the economy stays sluggish or continues to weaken, as some forecasts are expecting, Zhao says employee confidence is likely to fall even further.

“There is this cumulative stacking effect that people feel when there’s just bad news after bad news, and it’s really taking its toll on workers.”

Brit Morse
[email protected]

This story was originally featured on Fortune.com

© Getty Images

Employee confidence amongst entry-level workers just hit an all-time low since 2016, new data finds.

Here’s what the CHRO of IBM says most employers get wrong about implementing AI

9 June 2025 at 12:26

Good morning!

AI is redefining work as we know it, and implementing it company-wide is one of the major challenges that HR leaders are currently facing. 

One one hand, the new tech holds the promise of taking rote tasks and generally drudgery out of employees’ workflow. But because those tasks are often done by entry-level workers, it has the potential to create another problem: Breaking the talent pipeline for young people entering the workforce.  

“I think there’s a small, short term, realistic thing that’s happening as people are saying, we don’t know what these entry-level hires will do, because with our old programs, we don’t need them to do those things anymore,” said Nickle LaMoreaux, the CHRO of technology giant IBM at Tech Week 2025 in New York City on June 6. 

But she urges companies to take a wider-lens approach to how the tech can contour work, not kill it altogether. At IBM, she says that her department now uses an AI bot to assist with basic HR tasks like locating benefit information. While entry-level HR workers might have been tasked with doing that in the past, they now do things like analyze the feedback around AI processes, and troubleshoot ways to improve. 

Constantly finding new ways for employees to work with the technology will be how companies will find success with AI adoption moving forward, says LaMoreaux, and get the most out of their people.

“What are organizations doing around training? How are they redefining jobs? How are they thinking about not just today, three, five years out?’ If you want to be a leading organization, those are the conversations you should be spending time on, not on how many jobs can we get rid of.’”

Brit Morse
[email protected]

This story was originally featured on Fortune.com

© Getty Images

Leaders focus too much on replacing workers and not enough on training them for the future.
❌